The penny’s unlikely backer: Britney’s hubby (CNNMoney)
What the… ? At an event sponsored by Virgin Mobile, Kevin Federline has made it official that he stands against any future law that might eliminate the penny. Is Kevin Federline a moron? Doesn’t he realize that rising copper prices (though they’ve eased) is dramatically limiting the seignorage on the minting of $.01 pieces? Does he really want the economy to be shackled by such an inefficient currency unit going forward? What an outrage. Maybe we should start a petition to protest K-Fed’s screwy views on the monetary system. That would show him.
An Insider Trading Policy a Monkey Would Love (Truth On The Market)
Nobody ever likes when we write about this, but we can’t resist a chance to discuss the legalization of fraud. Certainly there are some of you who might directly be affected by this, right? There’s a phenomenon whereby you can convince someone that the legalization of insider trading would make the market more efficient, prove a cheap compensation mechanism for executives, and help price doubt into the market, and they’ll agree with you. But when it comes to down to putting theory into practice, they’ll hesitate and say “but it’s just not fair”. And despite the fact that this isn’t communist Russia (Ok, China), the fairness argument gets embedded into the law. Even former SEC commish Arthur Leavitt wrote that if the system isn’t “fair” then nobody will feel comfortable investing in the markets. But this ignores the fact that there have been periods of less insider-trading restrictions (and the fact that it still happens today) and the markets have always functioned. Besides, if a move to legalize the activity prompts a mass exodus from the market, so be it — sounds like buying time.
Lehman Uncommon Values Portfolio (Ticker Sense)
Per annual tradition Lehman has released its famous 10 Uncommon Values Portfolio — a list of stocks they think will outperform the market over the 12 months. The firm claims that the portfolio significantly outperforms the S&P, though that’s unclear. Last year it lagged the S&P 500 by over 7%. This year, of the ten stocks, only one is a carry over from last year, despite the fact that the stocks sagged. You’d think that these uncommon values would be even more uncommon after a down year, but apparently not. Also, if you’re looking for a trip, check out the portfolio from 2000. Uncommon indeed.
Optimisation of cliché synergies (The Age)
Wall Street loves its obfuscatory language, jargon and cant. It’s not just because that’s what you learn when you get in MBA; no, it’s because people have something to hide according to a study. By quantifying the readability of annual reports, researchers identified a correlation between poor stock returns and the amount of linguistic rubbish. Everybody has their favorite bit of jargon, and we could go on forever citing it. Just to keep it simple, we really like the word “leverage”. It sounds unassuming enough, and it’s used so often that you’d think it was being used the right way, but it’s not. Leverage doesn’t mean “use”. It’s a phenomenon that occurs when a little bit of pressure or force can have dramatic effects — and in real English it’s barely used as a verb. If you speak English, and haven’t been totally steeped in executive BS, it should sound absurd to say, “we’re going to leverage our global workforce”. Ok, rant over.
Read more »