Our earlier post on Nadia Marcinkova was written on the assumption that unlike the young girls Jeffrey Epstein is alleged to have paid to strip and massaged him while he pawed at them and masturbated into a towel, the eastern european blonde was a different kind of participant. Older, more sophisticated, at least a little lezzy and wearing stap-on dildos. That sort of thing. Just the sort of woman you’d imagine an evil villain would keep as his mistress.
As it turns out, that sort of woman probably only exists in fiction. Gawker is now reporting that according to a previously unpublished Palm Beach police document, Epstein bragged that he purchased Nadia from her family in Yugoslavia, and that she was his sex slave. So she may be another victim of Epstein’s alleged sex-and girls-for-money racket.
The weird thing is that Nadia seems to have at least once held a job at Douglas Elliman. Did Epstein set up his alleged sex slave as a real estate agent? Isn’t being a sex slave at least a full time job?
[Oh. And yeah. Alleged. Alleged. Allegedallegedallegedallegedtoinfinity. Epstein hasn't been found guilty of anything and it's up to the government to prove its case against him.]
Exclusive: Jeffrey Epstein’s Sex Slave [Gawker]
-
Posted in:
Jeffrey Epstein
Another Jeffrey Epstein Victim? Naughty Nadia May Be A Victim of International Sex Slave Trade
By John CarneyComments (2)
Leave a comment
You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.
It seems Prudential Douglas Elliman has taken the profile offline. At any rate, Dealbreaker and Gawker are doing a great job.
Funny how when “exposed” the mistresses, assistants, and “previously employed”, are suddenly “unavailable for comment” or just plain “dissapear”…
One can only wonder where is it that they go….? and is the silence “permanent”?
In Nadia’s case that would make the INS very interested… as well as the FBI and a number of other US government agencies. Let’s just hope she got back “home” safely…. where ever “home” is now… I suspect it’s far from Mr. Epstein’s.
Can you say “libality”? I think we can…