Back in the late nineties we briefly considered becoming derivatives traders just to work with one guy—Ralph Reynolds. He had recently been hired away from Morgan Stanley by NatWest to develop a U.S. equities derivatives business for them. Word was that Ralph was the real deal, hardcore, that he "got it.”
That move didn’t last long. Soon NatWest itself was on the block—it would eventually wind up with the Royal Bank of Scotland—and Ralph’s team wound up with Deutsche Bank, running their proprietary trading desk. (It was right around this time, by the way, that the NatWest 3 were allegedly doing whatever it is they allegedly did.) Someone else gave us a different job and our dreams of trading for Ralph slipped away.
Over the years we kept hearing about Ralph. When Morgan Stanley seemed to be melting down in 2005, for instance, he hired a bunch of lads from Morgan to work for him at Deutsche. Someone once wondered aloud if Ralph’s success at Deutsche was turning the entire bank into one big hedge fund.
Well, Ralph’s still with us. But he won’t be with Deutsche Bank for long. This morning Reuters is reporting that Ralph is moving over to Carlyle to run a hedge fund.
Carlyle to hire chief for new hedge fund-sources [Reuters]






Posted by Winston , Aug 01, 2006 1:09PM
Sounds like quite a guy. Anyway, it's "wondered aloud" not "wondered allowed."
Posted by Dealbreaker John , Aug 01, 2006 1:16PM
See what happens when Hank Paulson makes us do shots in the morning?
Posted by Paul , Aug 02, 2006 8:43AM
Hum, wonder if they'll hire NYC based Andrew Jacobs? Just a year outta U. Miami but a wunderkind of trading systems development . . . the next Jim Simons, but only age 23!
Posted by Paul , Aug 02, 2006 8:46AM
Hum, wonder if they'll hire NYC based Andrew Jacobs? Just a year outta U. Miami but a wunderkind of trading systems development . . . the next Jim Simons, but only age 23! Hear that big Asian & Middle East $ is just now chasing him.
Posted by Phil B. , Aug 02, 2006 9:06AM
Did hear of Andrew Jacobs' trading capabilities, they say advanced calculus is like a first grade reader to him. His dad used to be a systems researcher so I assume the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree. But why should he work for Carlyle? True, they have big money connections, but so does everyone else. I suppose tying up young algorithmic talent can mean mega profits for the next 50 years or so.
Posted by Bud , Aug 03, 2006 10:37PM
I endorse this move, Andrew is one big sexy. Carlyle will go down the tubes w/out him.
Posted by , Aug 10, 2006 12:26PM
Carlyle has the very closest connections with the Saudi Royal Family, among others of same ilk, including Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Makes sense for they to create a hedge fund business, though wonder why they took so long? Hiring a guy like Jacobs would be a coup, as he is young enough to $mine for decades, as opposed to middle & older age talent.
Posted by , Aug 10, 2006 12:33PM
Carlyle has the very closest connections with the Saudi Royal Family, among others of same ilk, including Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Makes sense for them to create a hedge fund business, though wonder why they took so long? Hiring Jacobs would be a coup, as he is young enough for they to $mine his mind for decades. [I presume a $10 to 20 mil. sign on bonus will help seal a deal.]
Posted by , Aug 10, 2006 12:38PM
A $10 to $20 million sign on bonus should get brainiac Jacobs . . . perhaps?
Posted by Jim R. , Aug 10, 2006 7:14PM
By way of example, given a token $1b in beginning equity that a Caryle can supply, margined 4x, would typically yield in excess of 100% to 130% per annum w/min standard deviation, i.e., almost no drawdown, as per what I have seen of Jacobs trading reports. Saying that, anyone who can earn $1b to $1.3b per annum for an employer deserves not only a significant sign on, but upwards of 10% of this profit per annum. Otherwise, he can form his own shop in a New York Minute, gladly financed by a bakery line of others.
Posted by Truth , Aug 22, 2006 2:20PM
Is this documentary expose' on Carlyle true? View with an open mind.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3995.htm