Archive for September 2006

wall_bull1.jpgDid you know that the 7,000 pound bronze bull at the end of Broadway—one of the now iconic symbols of Wall Street—was illegally placed in front of the New York Stock Exchange in 1989 by its maker, sculptor Arturo Di Modica? Or that he still owns the copyright covering the statute, and that it is merely on loan to the NYC Parks Department?
Neither did Wal-Mart, apparently. A lawsuit alleges that the chain has been infringing on Di Modica’s copyright by selling reproductions of the sculpture.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., North Fork Bancorp and eight other companies were sued by the sculptor who created the “Charging Bull” statue near Wall Street for unfairly profiting from his copyrighted work.
Arturo Di Modica claimed the companies are selling knockoff copies of his sculpture or using images of the famous statue in ad campaigns without his permission, according to a lawsuit filed yesterday in Manhattan federal court.

There’s a sort of reassuring logic to the idea that one of the great symbols of capitalism is actually private property.

Wal-Mart, North Fork Sued Over Use of `Charging Bull’
[Bloomberg]

Bay Area WhisperingWe noted earlier how the evolving story on Hewlett-Packard weird, paranoid and possibly illegal investigation into leaks is itself now being driven by leaks. The New York Times has reported stories based on “people briefed on the internal investigation” and other insiders. The Washington Post is reporting on internal H-P emails. It seems every financial news organization now has a source inside the company.
Since this all started as a campaign to plug leaks at H-P, the flood of leaks is ironic. But is a highly logical sort of irony. If you are an insider at H-P, you probably now have nothing to fear from leaking. There is zero chance the company is now going to launch any kind of thorough investigation to discover these leaks. It’s way too much trouble.
We wouldn’t be surprised to see widespread leaking from other companies as well, particularly those in the Bay Area. No one wants to be the next Hewlett-Packard, so no company will risk going to extraordinary lengths to find leakers. As the probability of getting caught leaking declines, the temptation to leak will only grow.
So, blame Hewlett-Packard if a new round of corporate whispering breaks out.

The buck is supposed to stop with guys at the top, according to more than a third of DealBreaker readers voting in our most recent Reader Poll. Thirty-seven percent of you said the blame for Amaranth’s meltdown should rest upon the shoulders of the fund’s founder, Nick Maounis. Brian Hunter, the man who ran the energy trades that landed the fund in hot water came in a distant second place, garnering just twenty-two percent of the votes, just ahead of Canada, which got twenty percent of the votes (presumably all coming from South Park fans).
After the jump, you can view the full results of the poll.

Continue reading »

MarkHurd.jpgYesterday’s revelations that Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd directly approved a sting-operation against a reporter arose after the Washington Post got hold of some internal company emails.

Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive Mark V. Hurd approved an elaborate “sting” operation on a reporter in February in an attempt to plug leaks to the media, according to an e-mail message sent by HP Chairman Patricia C. Dunn.
The document, one of more than two dozen e-mails obtained by The Washington Post, for the first time links Hurd to an internal investigation of media leaks that has led to criminal probes and will be the subject of a congressional hearing next week.
Internal e-mails show senior HP employees who were given the task of identifying anonymous news sources concocted a fictitious, high-level HP tipster who sent bogus information to a San Francisco reporter in an attempt to trick her into revealing her sources.

Just to keep things straight, let’s recap. Someone at H-P is leaking to the press internal documents about H-P’s investigation into who at H-P was leaking to the press. Clearly what H-P needs to do is investigate who is leaking information about the investigation about the investigation about who was leaking information about H-P. Ouch. It hurts just to think about that.

HP CEO Allowed ‘Sting’ of Reporter
[Washington Post]

Better MBA Survey

As we mentioned the other day, the Wall Street Journal has its business school rankings out this week. As usual, Michigan and Dartmouth are in the top slots. But then we started wondering: is this right? Or has the Journal’s methodology gone awry?
We asked some business school friends but they all fall into three camps. Coincidentally their opinions were very well correlated with where they went to school. The Dartmouth MBAs said the list was awesome except that Michigan isn’t better. The Wharton MBAs said the entire list had been broken for years. The Columbia MBAs were too busy to return our calls.
So here’s how we’re getting to the bottom of this. Below you’ll find the Journal rankings of the top ten. In the comments we invite you to place the schools in the order you think make the most sense.
1 University of Michigan (Ross)
2 Dartmouth College (Tuck)
3 Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper)
4 Columbia University
5 University of California, Berkeley (Haas)
6 Northwestern University (Kellogg)
7 University of Pennsylvania (Wharton)
8 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Kenan-Flagler)
9 Yale University
10 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Sloan)

  • 22 Sep 2006 at 9:56 AM
  • Amaranth

Is This Brian Hunter?

brianhuntermaybe.jpg
Well, it’s a Brian Hunter. But we have nothing but circumstantial evidence indicating it’s the Brian Hunter. He looks about the right age. Same name. And he’s in Canada. So, like, maybe, right?

Yesterday we asked: Who is to blame for the Amaranth meltdown? With hundreds of votes cast, you are mostly casting your stones in the direction of Amaranth founder Nicky Maounis. Brian Hunter, the young man who ran the energy trading desk at the fund, trailed his boss closely for most of Thursday until falling behind overnight. He’s now running about 13 points behind Maounis. And about twenty percent of you Blame Canada for the hedge fund’s losses.
We’re going to keep the poll open for a few more hours before declaring a winner. So get your votes while you still can!

Who is to blame for the Amaranth meltdown?
Brian Hunter (Rogue Trader)
The Government (Should have regulations covering these guys)
Nick Maounis (Should have had proper risk management)
The Weather (What’s up with no serious hurricanes this year?)
The Investors (Demanding outsized gains means taking outsized risks)
Canada (Why not?)

  
Free polls from Pollhost.com