Andy Xie. Andy Xie, Andy Xie, Andy Xie. Hast thou learned nothing from Lucy Gao?

I participated in the panels on commodity and China-India and in some obligatory dinner parties. On Friday night, the Singapore PM invited the speakers at the meetings that Singapore government organized. Trichet, Larry Summers, Paul Volker, Chuck Price, the finance ministers of ASEAN countries were there. No government official from China was there. I guess I was there to make it look like China was represented. The dinner was turned into an Oprah with PM Lee Hsein Long at the center. The topic was on the future of globalization. People fawned him like a prince. Of course, he is. There are two reigning royalties in the world that the Davos crowd kiss up to, Jordan and Singapore. The Davos crowd are Republican on economic issues and Democratic on social issues. Somehow, they mange to put aside their moral misgivings and kiss up to Lee Hsein and Abdullah.

Birthday party invite email continues after the jump.
Morgan Stanley Star Exits After an Email Leak [WSJ]

I tried to find out why Singapore was chosen to host the conference. Nobody knew. Some said that probably no one else wanted it. Some guessed that Singapore did a good selling job. I thought that it was a strange choice because Singapore was so far from any action or the hot topic of China and India. Mumbai or Shanghai would be a lot more appropriate. ASEAN has been a failure. Its GDP in nominal dollar terms has not changed for ten years. Singapore’s per capita income has not changed either at $25,000. China’s GDP in dollar has tripled during the same period
I thought that the questioners were competing with each other to praise Singapore as the success story of globalization. Actually, Singapore’s success came mostly from being the money laundering center for corrupt Indonesian businessmen and government officials.
Indonesia has no money. So Singapore isn’t doing well. To sustain its economy, Singapore is building casinos to attract corruption money from China. These western people didn’t know what they were talking about. Aside from the nauseating pleasantries, some useful information came out of it.
Trichet sounded very bullish on euro-zone economy. He noted that euro-zone was catching up with the US in growth rate and talked about further gain in 2007. His tone was much more bullish than our house view. As Japan is surprising on the downside, I don’t see how the rise of euro-yen could be stopped.
Larry Summers and Paul Volker were very worried about the US economy. As you probably know, Alan Greenspan is talking the same way. At the CLSA conference last week, he talked like on of his critics. There is a fear of a US collapse. Many Americans think that an Rmb reval would save the US [sic]. This is just a dream, in my view.
Most were worried about the future of globalization due to income inequality. As average workers in the west are not seeing wasge incrase, many may vote against globalization. I thought that they were understanding the benefit from cheap consumer goods. However, as inflation comes back, it does admonish the benefits for western consumers.
No one was worried about the growth outlook for China or India. The Indian Planning Minister was very bullish, talking about 9% forever.
My sense is that policymakers are related about the short-term economic outlook but anticipate the US collapse at some point. Americans think that Rmb reval could save the US. So they would keep pressuring China.
Andy Xie

Comments (12)

  1. Posted by Regulator | October 6, 2006 at 1:43 PM

    Nothing worthy of a forced resignation, so I’m guessing somebody leaked it just to try to get him in trouble, and he figured it out, decided he’d better not stick around for any other sabotage attempts.

  2. Posted by In the Industy | October 6, 2006 at 2:08 PM

    Sound pretty damn honest to me

  3. Posted by Bulging Bracket | October 6, 2006 at 2:58 PM

    Calling Singapore a money laundering center and saying that these Westerners don’t know anything is guaranteed to get you canned. The government of Singapore, namely the family that controls it, aren’t exactly big fans of criticism, never mind being called common criminals. They also control insanely huge pools of assets through Temasek and other vehicles.
    Unfortunately the Westerners on this blog don’t understand anything. Pay some more freaking attention! You can read every newspaper in the world online/through Factiva/Lexis… maybe y’all should do so!

  4. Posted by Regulator | October 6, 2006 at 4:09 PM

    Fine, so it ruffled some feathers. He criticized Westerners, and being a westerner I can’t say I’m too offended. Taking shots at shady dealings in Asia is obviously the more serious offense, and your point that it is bad for business is well taken. My only point was that Morgan is definitely going to stop short of saying he was out of line.

  5. Posted by Hedgie | October 6, 2006 at 5:39 PM

    Get a grip guys. These Asians are as prickly as the Muslims. You’d think they would have learned a thing or two by now.

  6. Posted by Investfund | October 7, 2006 at 1:07 PM

    Sound like Andy jealous of the high quality of life Singaporean has. He felt bad that China was left out. He had to make up story about Indonesia and China corruption money. He will go no where with this attitude. Good that people now found out how scum he is.

  7. Posted by Nick | October 7, 2006 at 3:49 PM

    Lee Jr will pay for what Sr did once the Sr is gone. It is nauseating for Westerners to fawn the family dynasty in Singapore while denouncing the same dynasty in NKor

  8. Posted by wendell solomons | October 8, 2006 at 6:26 AM

    Check out the first article at website

  9. Posted by wendell solomons | October 8, 2006 at 6:27 AM

    Check out the first article at website

  10. Posted by Steven | October 12, 2006 at 11:04 AM

    Very honest view. Nothing wrong.
    Truth sometimes hurt though.

  11. Posted by sopjagung | October 12, 2006 at 11:50 PM

    Dang, I really liked his writing in Morgan Stanley. His bit about Singapore propped up by Indonesian illicit money is probably true. After all, the Indonesia government had to negotiate for years just to work out an extradition agreement with Singaporean govt. Why would they be so reticent about extradition if the don’t need the money? Tens, if not hundreds, of known corrupt businessmen from Indonesia now reside in SG.
    I really hope he won’t stop writing and telling the world what he thinks about China like he used to do in Morgan Stanley. What a shame :(

  12. Posted by Firefox | November 14, 2006 at 9:14 PM

    By the same reckoning, is Dubai the money laundromat to corrupt African Nations as Singapore is to Indonesia/China?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.