Foxy Economists Making Field Less Dull

foxyoster.jpgWe're pretty sure that Emily Oster is more than just a set of nice eyes and a pretty smile. But we can't get over how every time we hear about her someone mentions that she's a hottie. Yesterday's New York Times story follows the typical pattern: mention her youth, her marital status (she married the boyfriend who helped her come up with her PhD thesis), and talk about how popular she is. It's probably no good to directly mention her looks, so better to simply run the photo.

But we're not the New York Times, and so we'll ask the question directly: is Emily Oster genuinely hot or just, you know, economist hot?

The Future of Economics Isn’t So Dismal [New York Times]

Comments

Posted by vespa, Jan 11, 2007 11:44AM

i guess she could get to hot but it looks like she is in desperate need of a makeover. is it really that hard to go to a descent stylist and put on some makeup in the morning? (i'd comment on her clothes but you didn't provide a full body shot) if you can find one that would be great.

Posted by V. Reeves, Jan 11, 2007 11:58AM

Not hot (in photo). Too wholesome. Very cute though. I wonder if she is related to the clipper family...

Posted by SPACman, Jan 11, 2007 12:02PM

Eh, from the photo she looks less than economist hot. More like IB analyst / associate hot

Posted by Tim Carney, Jan 11, 2007 12:08PM

V. Reeves is correct. She's very attractive, but Hot is the wrong word.

Posted by Mortimer, Jan 11, 2007 12:41PM

In asking readers to rate the attractiveness of a female economist, has DealBreaker.com reached a new low...? I wonder.

Posted by John Carney, Jan 11, 2007 12:45PM

Oh, please. I'm pretty sure I've been lower than this before. Besides, we're only taking this to the logical conclusion implied by the Times story, which made a point of things you rarely find in a story about male economists, like her marital status. And they ran that fetching picture.

So, see, it's like ironic or something. But also, we really want to know if you think she's hot.

Posted by Bulging Bracket, Jan 11, 2007 12:46PM

She's first wife hot, country club hot, take home to the parents hot. AKA not hot, but cute and respectable.

Also, she's crazy young for a Phd. She's 26! Brilliant, cute, driven, and working with the Freakonomics crowd. Who knows how good Shapiro's work actually is (advantages of TV to disadvantage toddlers... goes against the CW, very Freakonomics, and gets at the hidden problems of disadvantage, so probably actually really good despite getting an accolade from the Times), he's got a brilliant understanding of microeconomics, going long on an undervalued asset far before the wider market thanks to his material non-dsiclosed information. He's got a future in hedge funds!

Posted by ShortCrude, Jan 11, 2007 1:07PM

She's not hot. And 26 is the right age to finish a PhD at.

Posted by fairest, Jan 11, 2007 1:15PM

She's got great teeth. She's the Marisha Pessl of Economics. She's cuter but probably shorter than Pessl.

Posted by Mortimer, Jan 11, 2007 1:18PM

Hitting a new low isn't necessarily a bad thing. And no, she's not hot, but she is quite attractive. "Fetching" is an apt description. She's certainly better-looking than the brutes I encountered in college.

Posted by The Corner, Jan 11, 2007 1:26PM

Definitely cute, but again, not hot. I agree with the previous description of "country club" hot. To which I'll add "Academic hot" and "Pearl necklace hot" I also think she may have been in that Where my WASPs at video.

Posted by J Dubs, Jan 11, 2007 1:38PM

She looks like one of the Mmmm-bop kids.

Posted by Matt, Jan 11, 2007 2:08PM

Country club hot!!? You must not be a member...or you're from the north. She is not remotely hot in any context. With that jaw (s)he should consider boxing.

Posted by hhey, Jan 11, 2007 2:20PM

who wants doostang invites?
leave an email below

Posted by Bulging Bracket, Jan 11, 2007 2:39PM

26 is pretty fast for a Phd, but she went right into her doctoral program, rather than the usual masters then doctorate. You'll notice that Levitt took 5 years to get his Phd without getting a masters.

Course I'm more used to real sciences, where everyone gets their masters in 2-3 years and then Phd in 3-4, like in Physics or Engineering. I forgot that Economics was "special".

Matt: Outside of Spiers, I highly doubt that anyone has been below the Mason-Dixon Line outside of Spring Break. Very WASP/WEEJ with no drawl. You are apparently confused.

The Corner: I think she was also in the TeaPartay video.

Posted by cougar hunter, Jan 11, 2007 2:53PM

She's not my cup of tea, but then again I wouldn't kick her out of my bed for eating crackers.

Posted by Bradley, Jan 11, 2007 2:59PM

I agree with Matt, she looks like she could absorb a few left jabs while calculating (with multivariable differential equations solved in her head, no doubt) just when and where to land a nasty right hook.

Posted by Mordant Economist, Jan 11, 2007 5:05PM

She looks like Jorja Fox from one of the early seasons of CSI..

Posted by AJ, Jan 11, 2007 5:20PM

This is too imprecise. Can we define "Economist Hot"? Is Megan McArdle the standard? Or is she hotter than "Economist Hot"?

Posted by alphagenerator, Jan 12, 2007 5:24AM

C'mon, surely IB Analyst Hot is hotter than Economist Hot?

Posted by Political.Asylum, Jan 15, 2007 7:36PM

I think very few male members of The Sarcastic Idiocy Forum would turn her down. Maybe even a few of our female members, which in reality would be way hotter than just trying to decide if Emily is hot or not.

http://www.thesif.net/SIF/index.php?

Posted by ChicagoEcon, Apr 04, 2007 7:20PM

Oh my! If Emily Oster is hot or cute, the Dalai Lama must be Mr Universe. The only things that save her are her decent teeth and complexion.
Getting a PhD at 26 means the only thing she did in her life was econ work and is surely extremely narrow-minded and has no culture and life experience beyong her very narrowly-defined world of existence.

Posted by ahiehie, Dec 31, 2007 8:36AM

I have finally seen her. Picture is totally unfair. Her strong point is clearly her ass. Absolutely hot!

Posted by Bleh, Jan 07, 2008 1:14AM

This picture is terribly unfair to her. I recommend watching her TED talk. I have never got so excited while watching a lecture about AIDS.

You really need a body shot to get across just how sexy she really is. She is one of those lucky academic white girls that has been blessed with a nubile young booty that can make you cry. In other words she has a superior ass. Its plump and shapely and just perfect. It augments her instructional gestures.

Oh yes, i hear she is pretty smart also.

Post Your Comment