The Final Frontier of Feminism

gap.jpgThere’s a reason suffrage should’ve never passed and this is it: ever since women were given the right to vote, they think this victory accords them the voice to demand everything afforded to men, even if it’s not something to be desired. You don’t see men out there picketing for multiple orgasms and there’s a reason for that— they don’t want them. Who’s got the time?

Today’s WSJ article, “Dress Code of Silence” serves this point magnificently. It discusses the tearjerker of a fact that women have the raw end of the deal in terms of modes of dress in the workplace, namely in the financial sector. While “their male counterparts may sport ‘business casual’ khakis, many women on Wall Street feel they must toe a careful and conservative line.” One woman, a banker for Citigroup, even showed up to a purportedly “casual” event and got the wag of the finger for her attire, while her male colleagues got pats on the back and rounds of scotch for dressing themselves (one assumes) in “chinos and Izods.” Why don't we fight to wear rainbow flip flops or flipped-collar Polos while we're at it? Topsiders. Ribbon belts.

Que? This is the battle? To get to wear khakis? The sartorial embodiment of a terrible breed of human being? That’s just wrong. Women apparently “feel obliged to dress up in order to command authority,” which is concerning for several reasons, chiefly because it’s difficult to remember the last time we interfaced with someone (man or woman) wearing khakis and said to ourselves, “check out the pantaloons on that guy (or girl)—now that’s someone to reckon with.”

But the article notes that women don’t want to look frivolous and—stop the presses here—someone wearing khakis might (though we’re not sure why there’s a distinction of gender here). And because they don’t want to be “frivolous,” in the office or in print, several women “flatly declined to discuss what they wear to work.” Though, the author notes, much to our delight, that “all of the men [I] approached spoke eagerly about their wardrobes.”

A female sales trader outside of New York tell us, however, that there are two sides of the story.

Since I am the Liar’s Poker equivalent of “equities in Dallas,” I really get to push that line over. I wear jeans every Friday with Frye boots. Most days I wear a pair of Ralph slacks and a sweater—and frankly, since my "décolletage" is one of my last good features, it gets flaunted on a regular basis ! Today I have on that basic uniform, and I do have a couple of client meetings…I am LIVING THE DREAM.

Anyway. We’re not saying this phenomenon is totally self-imposed—though every quote is “women on wall street FEEL”—because clearly the playing field isn’t even and probably never will be. But khakis? Not worth fighting for.

Wall Street Women: Dress Code of Silence [WSJ]

Comments

Posted by Anonymous, Mar 22, 2007 12:26PM

Let's play a game Bess. When the conversation becomes awkward (and it always is) let's see how long it takes you to to drop the A-bomb.

Posted by , Mar 22, 2007 12:29PM

I enjoy her use of the word "anyway."

Posted by C, Mar 22, 2007 12:38PM

the story behind the story is that men should be protesting khaki's and izod's!!

Posted by Bulging Bracket, Mar 22, 2007 1:38PM

This is ridiculous. Keep the khakis for the yacht or the country club. The traditional London rules about appropriate city vs country attire are a great guide: suits and no brown shoes in town, tweed and brown on your estate for shoots and hunts.

Posted by Biz Reporter, Mar 22, 2007 2:07PM

Quit your complaining.

First off, I bet Dealbreaker has no dress code, so Bess probably does wear flip-flops and ribbon belts.

Second, if women want to wear whatever they want, then don't go into finance because in most other industries, women get away with dressing far more casually than men.

Posted by C, Mar 22, 2007 2:36PM

cher Biz Reporter .. it's so quaint of you to try to shoo the 'girls' away from high-paying careers in finance -- it's so much sweeter when they're school teachers or advertising acct execs making $20k a year, and can "wear what they want."

The article points out one of MANY MANY double standards on Wall Street, and instead of being constructive, you say "just go away" .. hopefully you will never be the father of girls, cuz their only chance at happiness will be to marry well.

Posted by Miles Cholmondeley-Warner, Mar 22, 2007 4:29PM

Men and women are very different, so double standards make sense. It's how the world works.

And anyway, women who eschew skirts in favour of slacks or khakis are at risk of infertility, spinsterhood, and beard growth.

WOMEN: KNOW YOUR LIMITS!

Posted by , Mar 23, 2007 1:56AM

but gap just made man pants for women and that really annoying commercial

Post Your Comment