Kirk Kerkorian Bids For Chrysler!

kirkkerorianbidsforchrysler.JPGThis is getting exciting! Kirk Kerkorian’s investment company, Tracinda, made a $4.5 billion cash bid for the Chrysler Group today, according to reports. This comes fast on the heals of three other headline making Chrysler stories:

• that Daimler-Chrysler’s big German boss, CEO Dieter Zetsche, confirmed the Chrylser group was for sale,
• that bids had been submitted by Blackstone, Cerebrus and Canadaian automanufacturer Magna International,
• and that JP Morgan was putting the deal on a fast track, reviewing the bids beginning this week and hoped to have selected a winner by month’s end.

Well, you can wipe those off the whiteboards, kids, because the headline is going to Kerkorian’s bid. Not only is it a cash deal, he’s also got the backing of both the United Auto Workers and Chrysler senior management.

Prior to this announcement it was widely rumored that Magna might have the strongest bid, since it was thought to be the most likely bidder to keep the Chrysler relatively intact and gain the cooperation of unions. But Kerkorian’s offer now seems the front-runner. In fact, it seems so strong that it might entirely change the game.

“You can bet the boys down at Blackstone and Cerebus are cancelling their Easter weekend plans,” a source who consults for many private equity groups told DealBreaker. “Time to rewrite the bids.”

Kerkorian has a long, storied history with Chrysler. In the mid-nineties he attempted to takeover the company in an alliance with Lee Iacocca. He remained one of the largest single shareholders in the car company until it merger with Daimler-Benz in 1998. At the time—and to this day—many saw Kerkorian’s handiwork behind the deal.

In the nineties Kerkorian was often represented as a “corporate raider” and many feared he wanted to own Chrysler only to destroy it, or at least disassemble the company and slice of its less profitable divisions and product lines. These days many fear that the private equity bidders have similar plans, and Kerkorian seems to be promising to keep the company intact.

“Can KirkKerk actually be the white knight he always claims he is and save Chrysler from the ‘merger of equals’ he initially drove them to? Stay tuned for the next episode of Crazy Chrysler!” Jalopnik editor Ray Wert told DealBreaker. (Note: Ray uses phrases like “he initially drove them to” but this isn’t his fault. It is a well-known condition that car pundits cannot resist automotive puns.)

"It's like the late 90's all over again, only in reverse," Ray added. (Note: Reverse. See what we mean?)

Kerkorian Offers $4.5 Billion for Chrysler [New York Times]
Tracinda's Letters to Chrysler [pdf via New York Times]
The Official Car Pundit Drinking Game: Is The UAW In Bed With Kirk Kerkorian? [Jalopnik]
Chrysler sale looks certain [Detroit News]

Update: The lads at Deal Journal are outdoing themselves translating the letters from Tracinda speak into a normal human language.
A sample:

The returns will not come quickly. Investors that feel the need to show “mark to market” results in their funds in relatively short time frames (just a few years) will not be willing to invest as necessary over an unusually lengthy period of time to achieve the necessary end results.
Dr. Z., why are you imperiling the future of Chrysler by playing footsie with the fast-money crowd from New York? I don’t have to live by the same rules and can be a better steward than the folks, like Cerberus, who’ve chosen the hound of Hell as their name and mascot.

Translating Kerkorian’s Chrysler Letter [Deal Journal]
Translating Kerkorian’s Letter II: The Terms [Deal Journal]

Comments

Posted by NotNasser, Apr 05, 2007 6:35PM

Just thinking out loud here, but ... shouldn't the petroleum companies start buying the automobile makers? If you made relish and the hot dog vendors were in trouble, you'd step up and make a bid, wouldn't you?

Posted by Dice-K, Apr 06, 2007 7:42AM

If people put relish on steak, salads, and ice cream then it would make sense. Chrysler and Ford could go under and petroleum usage would not change a bit.

Posted by NotNasser, Apr 06, 2007 10:41AM

"Chrysler and Ford could go under and petroleum usage would not change a bit."

That depends on what you mean by "go under," I suppose. If all their inventory is converted into scrap metal and all their factories are converted to condominiums than there is some opportunity cost for the folks who would otherwise have been fueling up those scrapped and unmade cars, surely.

If it were impossible to eat a hot dog WITHOUT relish, then the analogy would be better.

Or, of you wish, think of razor blades. Dont' they sell the razors themselves at a loss so they can lock you in to buying their blades?

Posted by , Apr 06, 2007 3:56PM

By go under I meant liquidated but what I was really trying to say is that the demand for petroleum would not change with their demise because the usage of cars would not change. The market share would just go to Toyota or Honda or even GM (for you red bloods).

The razor analogy is a better one but Chrysler is not the only who sells "razors" and unfortunately (or fortunately if you are a car owner) the razors (gas) are interchangeable. That reminds me, I need to buy razors. Now if only those damn El Cheapo razors fit in my Mach 3 like Costco gas fits in my BMW.

Posted by NotNasser, Apr 06, 2007 4:06PM

Yes, if Chrysler goes under and the market share goes to Toyota, which builds a lot more Prius' for it ... the petroleum companies will wish they had gotten involved in the hotdogs/razors end of the business.

Post Your Comment