Chief Audit Director Jumps Ship From Overstock

captainpatrickbyrneoverstockdirectorresignation.jpgAgainst all odds, the story of Overstock continues to get worse. The company has been a laughing stock to almost anyone who can be bothered to think about it anymore. It’s the focus of an SEC investigation. It is run by a chief executive whose name—Patrick Byrne—long ago became synonymous with wacky conspiracy theories. It regularly deploys nasty tactics to defame reporters who dare mention its deterioration. An it’s bleeding directors.

The latest news hit on Thursday when Ray Groves resigned from the board. Groves, who once ran Ernst & Young, was the head of Overstock’s audit committee. He was, in the eyes of some observers, the last and best hope the company had to maintaining a sense of credibility. His departure comes as only the latest of a series of resignations by board members. The past year has seen also seen departures by directors John Fisher and John Byrne, the CEO’s father. When your father bails on your company, you know you are in trouble. Or rather, you would know. Patrick Byrne seems to think it’s a sign of his company's strength. Or something. We’ve long ago given up trying to figure out anything about what goes on inside of Byrne-the-younger’s brain.

But other’s have not. After we took off for the long-weekend, Gary Weiss, Sam Antar and Herb Greenberg all looked into the latest resignation. What’s behind the latest departure? Well, the same thing that was behind the departure of Fischer and Byrne-the-elder: the CEO’s ridiculous “jihad” against the “sith lords” on Wall Street he claims are behind a naked shorting conspiracy that is depressing his company’s stock price.

“In a letter contained in an SEC filing this morning, Groves told the company, ‘My resignation relates to the company's prime broker suit.’ That's Overstock's suit alleging that prime brokers are somehow involved in a naked shorting conspiracy,” Greenberg reports.

[But is it more than the Overstock's lawsuit against prime brokers? Read more after the jump.]

Sam Antar, who was the CFO of Crazy Eddie before he was convicted of felony charges related to fraud at the company, knows a bit about what happens when the government closes in on a company. “Many former friends, colleagues, and co-workers distanced themselves from us. Eventually, I would learn that Eddie’s father (Sam M. Antar), brothers (Allen Antar and Mitchell Antar), and his brother-in-law Ben Kuszer had set us up to take the fall. Later, even my cousin "Crazy" Eddie Antar left me out to hang,” Antar writes on his White Collar Fraud blog. “Is a similar situation, going on at Overstock.com?”

From the looks of the evidence marshaled by Antar, the answer is an unequivocal yes. The sailors are scurrying for the life-rafts even as a wet-kneed Captain Byrne continues to shout orders to man the guns against the naked short sellers that no-one but him can see.

But is it just the lawsuit against prime-broker’s that sent Groves overboard? Perhaps not. Antar points out that Overstock is beset by problems—he details to accounting and disclosure issues—that that may have prompted the resignation. In a recent discussion on an internet message board, Captain Byrne refused to answer a question about why Groves left, citing board privacy as the reason for his reticence. But this excuse for silence doesn’t seem to be holding up.

Antar and Gary Weiss point out that SEC regulations require exactly the opposite of what Byrne think they do. “Overstock can't just cherry-pick the reason that are least embarrassing and leave the rest, the ones that make the CEO look like a jerk, concealed from shareholders and left in the ‘privacy of the boardroom,’" Weiss writes in his latest post.

Ray Groves Resigns as Director of Overstock.com [Press Release]
Ray Groves Resignation Letter [SEC]
Overstock's Board: Who Will be Next? [Herb Greenberg's Market Blog]
Why are people distancing themselves from Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne? [Sam Antar's White Collar Fraud]
Will the Last Overstock.com Director Please Turn Out the Lights? [Gary Weiss]
The "Private Dick' That Patrick Byrne Forgot [Gary Weiss]

Comments

Posted by , May 29, 2007 2:00PM

They're building out their overbought warehouses to house all the employees that are still left. The offices are shitty. Even the low people on the pole are getting disgruntled and leaving - who the fuck wants to work a white collar job out of a warehouse?

Posted by Jeremy, May 29, 2007 3:13PM

I'm confused here John, do you have any evidence to back up this comment?

After we took off for the long-weekend, Gary Weiss, Sam Antar and Herb Greenberg all looked into the latest resignation. What’s behind the latest departure? Well, the same thing that was behind the departure of Fischer and Byrne-the-elder: the CEO’s ridiculous “jihad” against the “sith lords” on Wall Street he claims are behind a naked shorting conspiracy that is depressing his company’s stock price.

It seems like Herb, Gary, and that convicted criminal Sam have no proof of anything, they only live on unsubstantiated allegations. Funny how that is exactly how they characterize the one they villify. It certainly would be refreshing if the fixated brain trust of financial blogging hacks actually came out with something that contained the evidence alongside it.

John, ever notice how the three leverage off each other and repeat the same jibberish? Two hacks and a crook all share a common thought.

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 29, 2007 3:50PM

Re:

"It seems like Herb, Gary, and that convicted criminal Sam have no proof of anything, they only live on unsubstantiated allegations."

My response:
The SEC investigation of Overstock.com and Patrick Byrne continues even after theydropped the investigation of Grandient Analytics.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by John Carney, May 29, 2007 3:52PM

Jeremy,

I am going to go ahead and assume you aren't challenging the eagerness of the DealBreaker staff to hit the beach for the weekend. Most likely you aren't clear why we linked the latest resignation to the suit against the prime brokers. For evidence, I suggest you click the link to the SEC filing containing Ray Groves' resignation letter. He writes: "My resignation relates to the Company’s prime broker suit."

Best,
JC

Posted by anon, May 29, 2007 4:06PM

Hi Jeremy,

If you aren't smart enough to sell your OSTK stock, will you PLEASE lend it to me so that I can short sell it?

Thanks,
anon

Posted by NotNasser, May 29, 2007 4:22PM

Jeremy,

Two of the three recently departed directors have drawn the connection in themselves in their letters, on file with the SEC for anyone who wants to check with EDGAR.

The third, (chronologically the first) -- the one who didn't make the connection explicit, was Daddy Byrne.

Posted by , May 29, 2007 4:46PM

Judd, not even posting under names that start with a different letter anymore, huh? I wish it was my job to comment on blogs and defend my failing employer all day long.

Posted by Beremy, May 29, 2007 6:49PM

I'd suggest that Judd ("Jeremy") sign his anonymous drivel "Director of Communications, Overstock.com" so we can identify the toadies defending this company as it collapses.

Posted by Tony Ryals, May 29, 2007 6:57PM

Obviously the fraudulent naked short selling claim, while mainly a penny stock scam, is much bigger than Overstock's or even Bernie Kerrick's, et.al.'s Taser stock pump and dump stock manipulations.

And how you on the East Coast who claim to be investigative journalists fail to investigate its origens is both tragic and comic.

Steve Forbes' pal James Dale Davidson, founder of the National Taxpayers Union (near the SEC's main office)seems to be blessed by incompetent investigative journalists. Why ?

You can find his Agora Inc ravings about the evils of naked short selling and
'electronic counterfeiiting' in Agora Inc's Vantage Point as late as 2004 when he claimed a 'crazy dog'(me)posting on the ragingbull.con's gmxx or genemax message board had the nerve to claim it was a James Dale Davidson pump and dump instead.(As was the Stanford University and Grin brothers,et.al., connected Endovasc among others.

Gary Weiss even phoned the NAANSS or National Association Against Naked Short Selling office in Blaine, Washington as early as 2003 and never even realized it was also James Dale Davidson's,et.al.'s Genemax office !? I suspect Genemax was named for Davidson's far right newsmax.con website.


The convicted securities scamster Thomas Ronk, whose 'naked short selling' software',that Roddy Boyd and thus Rupert Murdoch's NY Post helped promote,has taken Michael Zwebner's, Moshe Katsav's (ex Israeli President)and Mohamed Hadid's(suspect in Herndon, Virginic Islamic charity money laundering) 'UCSY' off its buyins.net naked short victims list.(Maybe Zwebner wasn't paying the touter Ronk enough.)

But I don't understand.This crook Thomas Ronk claims below the list pertains to ' the NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE naked short threshold list'.So is this fraudulent scumbag,(that Boyd and the NY Post gave good press to and who posted the bloomberg.con video mis-infomercial starring SEC's Chairman Christopher Cox, Georgetown's James Angel, Attorney John O'Quinn, et.al., joking or out right lieing ?

As for as I can tell the UCSY penny stock was never on any SEC 'sho' list was it ? So is Ronk's 'naked short list' his own or a figure of his software's imagination or what ?

And if the CIA gives the numbnut SEC Chairman Chris 'WMDS' Cox his monthly briefing are they part of his naked shorting claim fraud as well ? Is this organized crime or what ?


May 14, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) --
BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, announced today that these select companies have been removed from the NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE naked short threshold list: Rocket City Automotive Group Inc. (OTC: RCAU), Universal Communication Systems Inc. (OTC: UCSY). For a complete list of companies on the naked short list please visit our web site. To find the SqueezeTrigger Price before a short squeeze starts in any stock, go to www.buyins.net.

Rocket City Automotive Group Inc. (OTC: RCAU) CompleteAuto, a subsidiary of Rocket City Automotive Group, Inc. (Pink Sheets:RCAU - News) is an eBay Motors Preferred Services Provider and offers proprietary software, personnel and design solutions to hundreds of automotive dealerships around the country. CompleteAuto is a wholly owned subsidiary of RocketCity which was formed to acquire, manage supervise and operate corporations specializing in auction services, eCommerce, software development and retail automotive operations. With 1.1 million shares declared short as of April 2007, there is no longer a failure to deliver in shares of RCAU.

Universal Communication Systems Inc. (OTC: UCSY) and its subsidiaries engage in the development and marketing of solar energy systems and systems for the extraction of drinking water from the air. It offers portable photovoltaic cells in leather and plastic cases for consumer electronic products; photovoltaic consumer energy panel products; and solar power systems to government and industrial users worldwide. The company was founded as Worldwide Wireless, Inc. in 1997 and changed its name to World Wide Wireless Communications, Inc. in 1998. Further, it changed its name to Universal Communication Systems, Inc. in 2002. Universal Communication Systems is based in Miami Beach, Florida. With 375.13 million shares outstanding and 60,500 shares declared short as of April 2007, there is no longer a failure to deliver in shares of UCSY.

About BUYINS.NET

WWW.BUYINS.NET is a service designed to help bonafide shareholders of publicly traded US companies fight naked short selling. Naked short selling is the illegal act of short selling a stock when no affirmative determination has been made to locate shares of the stock to hypothecate in connection with the short sale. Buyins.net has built a proprietary database that uses Threshold list feeds from NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE to generate detailed and useful information to combat the naked short selling problem. For the first time, actual trade by trade data is available to the public that shows the attempted size, actual size, price and average value of short sales in stocks that have been shorted and naked shorted. This information is valuable in determining the precise point at which short sellers go out-of-the-money and start losing on their short and naked short trades.

BUYINS.NET has built a massive database that collects, analyzes and publishes a proprietary SqueezeTrigger for each stock that has been shorted, www.buyins.net/squeezetrigger.pdf. The SqueezeTrigger database of nearly 1,350,000,000 short sale transactions goes back to January 1, 2005, and calculates the exact price at which the Total Short Interest is short in each stock. This data was never before available prior to January 1, 2005, because the Self Regulatory Organizations (primary exchanges) guarded it aggressively. After the SEC passed Regulation SHO, exchanges were forced to allow data processors like Buyins.net to access the data.

The SqueezeTrigger database collects individual short trade data on over 7,000 NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ stocks and general short trade data on nearly 8,000 OTCBB and PINKSHEET stocks. Each month the database grows by approximately 50,000,000 short sale transactions and provides investors with the knowledge necessary to time when to buy and sell stocks with outstanding short positions. By tracking the size and price of each month's short transactions, BUYINS.NET provides institutions, traders, analysts, journalists and individual investors the exact price point where short sellers start losing money.

All material herein was prepared by BUYINS.NET, based upon information believed to be reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by BUYINS.NET to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. BUYINS.NET is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker before purchasing or selling any securities viewed on or mentioned herein. BUYINS.NET may receive compensation in cash or shares from independent third parties or from the companies mentioned.

BUYINS.NET affiliates, officers, directors and employees may also have bought or may buy the shares discussed in this opinion and may profit in the event those shares rise in value. RCAU has previously paid a $995.00 data fee to BUYINS.NET. Market commentary provided by Thomas Ronk.

BUYINS.NET will not advise as to when it decides to sell and does not and will not offer any opinion as to when others should sell; each investor must make that decision based on his or her judgment of the market.

This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may", "future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates", "draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements included herein, and not place undue reliance on such statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are made as of the date hereof and BUYINS.NET undertakes no obligation to update such statements.

CONTACT: Thomas Ronk, CEO, www.buyins.net Tel: +1 800 715 9999 e-mail: Tom@buyins.net

M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info@m2.com.

(C)1994-2007 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD

Posted by Tony Ryals, May 29, 2007 7:31PM

And one more interesting 'coincidence' is that Circle Group Holdings was being touted by James Dale Davidson in Agora Inc's Vantage Point in the very same article or penny stock tout in which he was bashing me.

Then a while ago 'Bob O'Brien',who Gary Weiss and Rupert Murdoch's boy Roddy Boyd like to repeat over and over like a mantra is a 'Phil Saunders',also began a tout for Circle Group Holdings as, you guessed it, a victim of 'naked shorting'.

There are so many 'coincidences' that
recall James Dale Davidson,it's almost comical to watch Weiss and Boyd doing
there best to ignore them.

Posted by , May 30, 2007 1:14AM

Tony, I realize that you believe the whole world is out to get you, so rationalization may be hard to come by.

But all of this aside, why can't Byrne post better financial results? They are not dependent on his stock price, except that he spends time obsessing over one and letting the other fail.

Posted by Jeremy, May 30, 2007 8:30AM

Sam, you are rather amusing.

I believe that yours, Herbs, and Gary's claims are that the filings you reference are misleading and do not tell the entire truth. Now you cite these as your rationalization to make more of it than what is in the filings.

You are a crook. You have to some degree proven you have not changed skins as you literally stalk Byrne and every other person whose desire it is to break into full transparency of the trade issues.

As for Gradient, Overstock, etc...What will you say when the Overstock case is closed without finding? You keep accusing Overstock of making false filings, if the SEC closes their investigation (now 2-years old) without a finding will you be man enough to beg as much forgiveness to match the level of unsubstantiated bile you spew?

Why is it that you, Herb, and Gary all seem to follow each others moves to the "T" when it comes to Overstock and do it with such frequency that it has become obscene. Have you ever backed up your allegations with anything but unsubstantiated innuendo?

Posted by eddy, May 30, 2007 9:31AM

Hi Jeremy: Have you ever met Patrick Byrne? I'm just wondering what he smells like. In his pictures he always looks like he probably smells quite badly - a whiff of necrosis mixed with a dash of Lysol, kind of thing.

Posted by Jeremy, May 30, 2007 10:51AM

Nope, never met him. But after getting a look at Gary Weiss I see what you mean by a whiff of necrosis. Has weiss ever taken a shower?

More amusing is probably Sam Antar who most likely had a few "shower events" in his hey day in the clink.

But I digress.

Posted by Tony Ryals, May 30, 2007 11:49AM

It looks like you all on the east coast should be paying more attention to the penny stock companies guarding your airports and real estate than worrying yourselves with whether or not I'm paranoid.

And apparently,had you kept Israeli and Kuwaiti and Bush family penny stock criminals away from them the U.S.
would not have lost more American lives in Iraq so far than were lost by having
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's pals guarding Boston's Logan Airport or the Bush's Kuwaiti pals guarding Dulles and the WTC. Is that paranoid enough for you ?

Posted by Sam E. antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 30, 2007 1:03PM

Re:
"Sam....you are a crook."

My response:
There is a saying, "It takes a crook to catch a crook."

Re:
"...you literally stalk Byrne and every other person whose desire it is to break into full transparency of the trade issues."

Questions for Patrick Byrne:
Is your excuse for your actions going to be the naked shorting issue?

How does naked shorting justify your actions and Judd Bagley's actions?

Let see if the "humble servant" can answer for himself, truthfully and unambiguously.

Let him show his so-called transparency.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Gradient Loses, May 30, 2007 3:51PM

Rocker/Gradient just lost their appeal of the lower court decision. Maybe now the truth will come out in a court, under full discovery, instead of having lunatics like Sam and Gary Weiss speaking from nothing but BS.

BTW Sam, the fact that you don't approve of Overstock Managements actions does not make those actions lies, or illegal. Fact is, you simply have an axe to grind and do it freely. I would say that your actions and reason for action are far less transparent yet you have no problem keeping it that way. neither do the other two in your group of three ratskateers.

Have you asked Gary Weiss how he justifies his stalking of every breath Byrne and Bagley make? Weiss' blog is certainly evidence of that all you have to do is scroll down the list of unsupported allegations by Weiss.

Posted by Gradient Loses, May 30, 2007 3:56PM

Rocker/Gradient just lost their appeal of the lower court decision. Maybe now the truth will come out in a court, under full discovery, instead of having lunatics like Sam and Gary Weiss speaking from nothing but BS.

BTW Sam, the fact that you don't approve of Overstock Managements actions does not make those actions lies, or illegal. Fact is, you simply have an axe to grind and do it freely. I would say that your actions and reason for action are far less transparent yet you have no problem keeping it that way. neither do the other two in your group of three ratskateers.

Have you asked Gary Weiss how he justifies his stalking of every breath Byrne and Bagley make? Weiss' blog is certainly evidence of that all you have to do is scroll down the list of unsupported allegations by Weiss.

Posted by Gradient Loses, May 30, 2007 3:57PM

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/disposition.cfm?dist=1&doc_id=65285

Seems like the SLAPP was on Rocker/Gradient

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 30, 2007 4:39PM

I wonder how Patrick Byrne feels about the SEC investigation going on now relating to Overstock.com and him.

That's right, he claims to welcome it.

He can't even handle a simple question from a reporter or from a person on a message board.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Jesse, May 30, 2007 8:33PM

Sam, are you really that stupid (oh yea, you are a convicted felon, of course you are).

"He can't even handle a simple question from a reporter or from a person on a message board."

Lets see, you, Weiss and Greenberg villify the guy with bogus claims and now make these allegations that he is ducking you. have you noticed that Greenberg and Weiss moderate their boards to silence the critics? As for a Blogger, get real, I went to your site and it is self serving BS. You never provide evidence but instead relate everybody to your actions thus trying to justify your opinion. Not everybody comes from the same scum pool as you do and thus, they can be honest people simply doing the right thing.

But go ahead and try to fake your graces with God, the Devil will still be awaiting your presence.

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 31, 2007 2:23AM

Re:

"...have you noticed that Greenberg and Weiss moderate their boards to silence the critics?"

Question:
Aren't you exercising a form of censorship by posting just in your alleged first name?

Does Judd Bagley moderate comments on antisocialmedia.net, too?

Didn't Patrick Byrne try to censor me on InvestorVillage.com?

What does the moderating of comments have to do with the accounting issues at Overstock.com that the SEC is investigating?

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by , May 31, 2007 3:26AM

"But go ahead and try to fake your graces with God, the Devil will still be awaiting your presence."

Judd Bagley for sure.

Posted by Jesse, May 31, 2007 6:52AM

Sam you are a typical shill and crook. You answer a question defensively by turning the question back unanswered. Didn't your mom tell you not to answer a question with a question? What are you afraid of Sam, that Overstock will prevail in a court of law?

And no, I am not Judd but then again, you never use facts to tout your opinions so it goes to nature that you would claim I am.

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 31, 2007 9:07AM

You wrote:

"And no, I am not Judd but then again, you never use facts to tout your opinions so it goes to nature that you would claim I am."

My response:

You had written, "have you noticed that Greenberg and Weiss moderate their boards to silence the critics?"

In response I asked you: Does Judd Bagley moderate comments on antisocialmedia.net, too?

Therefore, I did not say you were Judd Bagley.

So I guess you have no problem making making opinions without a factual basis.

Keep on whinig and ranting. It is your time to waste.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Jesse, May 31, 2007 12:48PM

Lets get to the meat here Sammy.

1. I am not Judd Bagley and I have no idea whether he moderates his boards or not. I say this because of teh posters who are claiming I am. Herb and Weiss have stated they do moderate board comments. Thus free speech has dual meanings to these guys.

2. You and the other groupies you hang with continue to rant on about Byrnes unethical behavior and yet, you have no factual proof of wrongdoing. True or False?

If I am not mistaken even the SEC has yet to find wrongdoing in Byrne or Overstock desite all your allegations that the investigation itself implies wrongdoing. Byrne has identified that teh investigation was not directed at him but that he was issued a subpoena for the documents he had. Can you PROVE that those statements are false?

3. Accounting issues at Overstock? The SEC investigates accounting issues all the time. In fact, many accounting investigations are initiated after Hedge Funds file complaints with the SEC. The last time Overstock had a known accounting issue it restated earnings - FOR THE BETTER. Do you have evidence that Overstocks books are cooked? If so, please come forward with them. How many other companies is the SEC investigating relative to accounting issues? How many times does the SEC close such investigations without a finding? heavily shorted Allied Capital, Taser, Travelzoo, Netflix, etc... were all closed without a finding.

4. If you were astute you would have known by now that Byrne repeatedly claims that Overstock is NOT about naked shorting. He is not suing for naked shorting. Byrne has stated that his interest in naked shorting is a sidebar issue that refers to the markets as a whole and not to Overstock specifically. But then again, truths like that are not part of your agenda correct?

So Sam, now that I have come clean, where is your cleansing going to come from. Since you run around every board you can and claim Byrne the crook, why not offer up your evidence. (Please don't respond with another juvinile post about how Byrne does not respond to you, Answer a direct question yourself and maybe he would have the respect to respond.

Posted by Brett Baker, May 31, 2007 2:07PM

But Judd, Overstock just sued the prime brokers over naked shorting. Did you forget that? Tsk tsk. Some "director of communications" you are. You can't seem to communicate with your frontal lobe. Go back to your astroturfing smear site.

P.S. Did anyone ever tell you that you look like a child molester?

Posted by Brett Baker, May 31, 2007 2:10PM

But Judd, Overstock just sued the prime brokers over naked shorting. Did you forget that? Tsk tsk. Some "director of communications" you are. You can't seem to communicate with your frontal lobe. Go back to your astroturfing smear site.

P.S. Did anyone ever tell you that you look like a child molester?

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), May 31, 2007 11:24PM

You wrote:

“Byrne has identified that teh investigation was not directed at him but that he was issued a subpoena for the documents he had. Can you PROVE that those statements are false?”

My response:

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating Overstock.com and Patrick Byrne for possible violations of securities laws.

As you said “Lets get to the meat here….”

If Patrick Byrne believes that my statements here and else where violate any law, he is free to seek redress in the Courts. He seems to have no problem suing people he dislikes.

However, Patrick Byrne should know that truth is a defense in any litigation. He should know that the process of discovery is a two way street.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Jesse, Jun 01, 2007 8:15AM

Nice bob and weave there Sam. you must have learned that in prison as you ran from the boys.

FWIW, you are correct that discovery is a two way street although you seem to think Byrne has no legal right to discovery on who is abusing his stock and as to whether Gradient did in fact take directions on what to report from Rocker.

Apparently he is not free to redress people in the courts as for some reason you and your band of ill-mannered associates are under the impression Byrne has no right to take his concerns into a courtroom.

Hey, when Herb and Jim and Carol and roddy and TheStreet.com were issued subpoenas was the SEC investigating them for possible violations of securities laws or were they fact finding? Are you so sure that many of the issues requested in the SEC subpoena to Byrne were not also fact finding? I can understand the accounting investigation (hedge fund set that one off) but the rest of the requested material seems more fact finding than securities law violations.

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), Jun 02, 2007 4:18PM

Re:

"Nice bob and weave there Sam...."

My response:

These are the words from an anonymous poster to a person who signs his posts in his real name and is unfraid to mention that he is a convicted felon.

Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Jesse, Jun 03, 2007 11:38AM

You sound kind of childish here Sam. "I know you are but what am I".

I have witnessed your rants and posts elsewhere and ironically this is a tact you only take with those that oppose you. I notice that you never question the identity of those that stand by your side and make similar rants. In fact, you have never questioned one Gary Weiss for running through message boards under multiple aliases.

As for me, my name is Jesse what else would you like to know?

You are a true coward who wants to place blame on others because of your personal moral mistakes. I have repeatedly asked you here to simply back up your commentary with evidence and instead of doing such you spin the question like a child.

The burden of proof is on you as you are making the accusations. In a court of law you are acting as the prosecutor so come out with something other than opinion, come out with factual evidence.

As a matter of reference, I suggest you look back on history where the SEC has dropped investigations yet civil and criminal courts found fault. The SEC dropping Gradient investigation in no way means Gradient has done no wrong. As a convicted crook you should be aware of that. Simply look to Refco as that perfect and most recent example.

Posted by Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon), Jun 03, 2007 8:53PM

Re:

"The burden of proof is on you as you are making the accusations."

My response:

Read this (for example):
http://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/2007/06/memo-to-judd-bagley-director-of.html

I guess Judd Bagley kind a liked that comment so much, that he never deleted it.

Comment on antisocialmedia.net:

alpineanalytics wrote:

"Gary Weiss is PATHETIC…his books suck …he is a weasel. In fact, there are quite a few people out there that are going to make an example out of him. He should be looking over his shoulders more carefully when he wants to engage in disrespectful behavior with people that will hurt him…economically, emotionally, and probably physically. Hey Gary…Louie P and Benny S. say hi…you $cumbag."

Posted 10 Sep 2006 at 8:36 am


Respectfully,

Sam E. Antar (former Crazy Eddie CFO & convicted felon)

Posted by Jesse, Jun 04, 2007 6:52AM

Sam,

The fact that Weiss and Bagley write about each other with distaste does not make Bagley the bad guy and Weiss the good guy.

I am just wondering where your evidence against Byrne and Overstock are. I am also wondering why you continue to spin this deceptions to go off topic. Isn't that what got you convicted in the first place?

I ask again - What proof do you have that Byrne or Overstock have done anything illegal? Since you have made this a personal issue, writing near daily about it, what proof do you have to support the allegations? If you are truly reformed you would stop the nonsense and provide factual evidence not opinions and innuendo.

Post Your Comment