The revelations of George Tenet were the talk of the Sunday morning political shows this week. Despite Tenet’s defense of his own work and the work of the rest of the Central Intelligence Agency, there is still the widespread impression that our primary intelligence gathering agency is broken. The causes of the CIA’s problems are widely debated—some say it is too centralized, others that it is overstaffed by professional bureaucrats, others that it is still built around a defunct Cold War model, to name a few favorites. But Steve Sailer has recently contributed a new idea: Wall Street broke the CIA.
“CIA agents get paid like normal government bureaucrats, so the Agency gets normal government bureaucrat-quality workers,” Sailer writes. “Meanwhile, the pay at its natural competitors for the best and the brightest, such as Wall Street firms, has rocketed upwards.”
But we’re not sure it’s merely a problem of the CIA being unable to recruit the brightest college graduates. We personally know a couple of graduates from top schools—two of whom had at least a working knowledge of Arabic when they graduated—who never even got a call back interview at the agency. We can’t help but suspect that the agency isn’t even trying to recruit the “best and the brightest” these days.






Posted by opd , May 07, 2007 4:26PM
Many of the "best" colleges even make it difficult for the CIA to recruit.
I studied Chinese at one of the best damn schools in the world and they wouldn't let the CIA on their campus (granted this was several years ago, before the Solomon Ammendment, so things may be different).
Then I went to Asia and came back after several years. I looked into applying but they say a background check for someone who has been overseas for several years will take a very long time ... what am I supposed to do, sit on my ass and wait for them to give me a call? Ah, no!
Posted by BSD , May 07, 2007 4:31PM
The CIA understands its shortcomings and knows it can't retain the best and brightest given the nature of the average CIA job (it's not all cloak and dagger espionage even if you're fluent in Arabic and can disassemble an AK47 in 15 seconds). If the IBs would follow suit there'd be much less 1st year analyst turnover. Of course CIA training costs a lot more and takes far longer than 2 months of Training the Street.
Posted by anonymous , May 07, 2007 4:35PM
Sometimes the "best and brightest" have personal backgrounds involving minor things such as a little recreational drug use, a DUI, or other misdemeanors, and are reluctant to invite the CIA to uncover them in the course of a background check.
Posted by fopw , May 07, 2007 4:44PM
maybe the problem is we need more of those w/ "real-world" experience not just good grades at a "prestigious" school.
Posted by BSD , May 07, 2007 4:47PM
opd & anon,
Yeah, that's the other thing - the background check for the CIA is extremely extensive. I have two friends who went through the process and they were not allowed to speak to anyone about it and were pretty much told point-blank that they would be followed and their friends would be questioned. This is in addition to the usual record checks, poligraph and psych tests, etc. You really can't have any skeletons in your closet.
Posted by Michael Yass , May 07, 2007 5:07PM
From what he revealed during his appearance on Meet the Press, Tenet was pretty much as negligent as could be...the 16 words were not caught because he DIDN"T READ THE STATE OF THE UNION!!!! AND THEN HE DIDN'T WATCH THE SPEECH! Heckuva job Georgey! No wonder the Agency is off its top form.
Posted by Auto , May 07, 2007 7:37PM
I was friends with a guy who years ago had been a high political appointee in the State dept. He never stopped telling me that the most disappointing people he met in the government were big shot corporate types and the top guys in the CIA. He advised that if I read the NYT/WaPo/WSJ on a regular basis, I'd know everything the CIA knows about what's happening in the world.
There were a couple of ex-CIA folks in my fancy business school. Real lightweights. Not at all impressive.
Posted by mohd amin , May 08, 2007 5:40AM
in page 142 0f mr. tenet's book he refers to nawaz sharif as the former pakistani president who was toppled by perves musharaf.this is not accurate.mr. sherif was the elected prime minister .
mohd amin, jenin ,palestine
Posted by Anonymous , May 08, 2007 9:07AM
What do you mean the agency isn't in top form? They pulled off 911 without a hitch didn't they? That was pretty sneaky if you ask me.