The Dow of Murdoch: Is Rupert Losing Confidence? Or Is This Just A Deal Tactic?

NEWSCORPDOWJONESRUPERTMURDOCHWALLSTREETJOURNALSMALL.JPGThe story at the end of week two of News Corp’s bid for Dow Jones is clearly the loss of confidence that this will end in an acquisition. No other bidders have emerged. News Corp hasn’t made any gestures that it might increase it’s bid. Quite the opposite—word is spreading that News Corp won’t increase it’s bid and that News Corp CEO Rupert Murdoch has told a close associate that he is not certain he will prevail.

Murdoch seems to be trying to use charm rather than money to win over the Bancroft family, which controls the company through its super-voting shares and has announced—through a representative on the Dow Jones board—that it isn’t going to take News Corp’s offer. He’s telling jokes. Keeping it light. On the News Corp earnings call he spoke of his admiration for the Bancroft family and Dow Jones management. And he’s more or less apologized for the fact that his offer became public, claiming he hoped to negotiate the deal in private—contrary to rumors that the leak came from News Corp. The point of this is to make nice with the Bancrofts, to take away the impression that Murdoch went public with his offer in an attempt to get the public shareholders to pressure the family into selling the company. No one likes to be strong-armed.

(After the jump: A completely paranoid deal judo conspiracy theory.)

These remarks—his private doubts and his charm offensive—seem to have convinced a lot of analysts and investors that News Corp isn’t planning on, well, “sweetening” his bid for the company. Shares of Dow Jones drop a bit every time Murdoch uses words rather than dollar signs. Dan Dorfman, writing in the New York Sun, quotes a hedge fund manager who is shorting Dow Jones stock after concluding that the News Corp bid is a “non-deal.”

But we’ve also heard whispers of a conspiracy theory among some observers who suspect that Murdoch may be trying to scare the Bancrofts—and other shareholders—into believing that his first offer was his best offer. He may, in fact, sense weakness among the Bancroft family and be looking to tell them that this is as good as it’s ever going to get, some say.

The general impression within the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by Dow Jones, is that the deal looks far less likely to happen at the end of this week than last week. “There’s a lot less sense that this is inevitable,” someone familiar with the atmosphere inside the paper told us.

Next week: Intense media scrutiny of the Bancrofts (most likely) raises the question: will they sell to regain their privacy?

Murdoch regrets publicity over Dow Jones bid [CNNMoney]
Murdoch hints at no boost to Dow Jones bid [Financial Times]
Falling Dow: Doubts Grow About Murdoch’s Bid
[DealBook]

Comments

1

Posted by Joe , May 11, 2007 4:14PM

"He may, in fact, sense weakness among the Bancroft family and be looking to tell them that this is as good as it’s ever going to get, some say."

If he really wants to get this deal done, he should announce that he'll reduce his offering price by $.50 every two days, sort of like in the movies when the hostage taker announces that he'll kill another hostage every hour until he gets his demands met.

If I recall, Larry Ellison used a vaguely similar tactic during Oracle's pursuit of PeopleSoft, which ended up working pretty well.

2

Posted by SDH , May 11, 2007 4:18PM

RUPE WAS PROBABLY TESTING THEM BANCROFTS TO SEE IF THEY WOULD BUDGE AND CLEARLY THEY DIDN’T AND PROBABLY WON’T. AT THE SAME TIME I DON’T THINK RUPE WILL LOSE SLEEP IF A DEAL DOESN’T HAPPEN. HE WILL SIMPLY MOVE ON AND PERHAPS LAND IN THE NEWS AGAIN AFTER GOING AFTER ANOTHER COMPANY. THE THOMSON-REUTERS DEAL WILL HAPPEN AND RUPE’S DOWJONES BID WILL STILL BE JUST THAT, A BID THAT FELL FLAT. THEN AGAIN SHIT HAPPENS RIGHT. MAYBE HE CAN GO AFTER YAHOO! OR SOMETHING WHO KNOWS. BRING LACHLAN BACK!

3

Posted by james.bond , May 11, 2007 5:57PM

On the News Corp earnings call "her" spoke of his admiration for the Bancroft family and Dow Jones management.

I thought they still teach English at Andover.

4

Posted by Banker Gal , May 11, 2007 6:18PM

You are so clever, James. So clever. Spotting typos is sexy.

5

Posted by james.bond , May 11, 2007 8:51PM

Banker Gal,

You can find me on craigslist if you are interested.

Best,
James

6

Posted by Chris G. , May 11, 2007 9:22PM

If you've been reading the opinion section of the Journal the past couple of days, you've noticed the sequential arguments from it's readers first against the proposed merger, then in favor of it. It's an interesting case of morality vs. capitalism.

I, for one, will admit to siding with the former. The Wall Street Journal is among the finest global economic publications currently in print. The separation of their news and opinion departments ensures that the articles are fairly bias-free, whilst their opinions - at least in my view - are often as accurate as they are prescient.

Those who put forth the argument that - as a publication largely endorsing capitalism - it's reader base is acting irrationally in not supporting this 'creation of value' (I'm not sure which line has ever been overused - that, or "Dude, where's my car?"), should look no further than themselves in terms of irrationality.

Perhaps Rupert Murdoch should offer a 50% premium for DOW Chemicals (what creation of value for shareholders!), then change production to long-range artillery shells which can deliver chlorine gas in aerosol fashion. Then he can buy General Dynamics and create NEW and FANTASTIC artillery to deliver these shells from the safety of Kansas.

If you want to walk softly and carry a big stick, that's a pretty f'ing great creation of value to me, dude.

Fox news used to be an alternative to that 2nd tier media lobotomy, CNN. Now, it's a parrot for some of the more obnoxious views in the US. Like the New York Times and it's overseas counterpart Al-Jazeera, Rupert Murdoch has transformed the station into a partisan social policy platform.

If you read all the different viewpoints, then think about what you've read, you know what I'm talking about. F you Mr. Murdoch - do us all a real favor and buy the New York Times.

7

Posted by Daniel , May 13, 2007 8:32AM


Buffett on buying the WSJ:

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003584168

I'll let you guys think of something funny to say.

Post Your Comment