cheatingthestreetdotcom.jpgStock picking contests on the internet are not quite working out. Inadequate security systems allowed cheaters to swindle CNBC’s recent content. And last night the TheCheat.com TheStreet.com cancelled the first round of its Beat the Street Competition because some contestants had “employed trading strategies to achieve returns that could not be duplicated in the real world.”*
After the jump, you can read the full memo from TheStreet.com about the cancellation. But we’re curious about what these “trading strategies” might have been. TheStreet.com isn’t giving up the details on these strategies. We’d like to hear what you think.
But to start things off, we polled a couple of our friends for ideas.
“I think the cheaters were trying to exploit irrational spreads between currencies and interests rates without the rest of the world finding out what they were doing,” said a cigar chain-smoker named Jimmy who is mildly obsessed with the collapse of Long-Term Capital.
“Nah. They were definitely trying to listen to some physicist-cum-Quant who had too much access to Excel and tried to use the Riemann Hypothesis to time the energy commodities markets,” said a former Citadel project manager named Trish.
“I’m positive that the plan was to IPO companies using obscure financial valuations based on ‘economic net income’ to reap windfalls,” said guy we’ll just call Steve BlackGuy.
“They were going to invest based on advice they heard on a prominent financial news network between the hours of six and seven in the evening,” said another person who we are making up.
Since you can’t really trade currencies or commodities in the contest, much less IPO a company in the Beat The Street contest, we’re pretty sure none of these are right. And the last is just plain implausible—no one would ever try that idea. So in comments below, we invite you to give us your unworldly trading strategies.
* Disappointingly, the phrase “strategies to achieve returns that could not be duplicated in the real world” has nothing at all to do with the true story, of seven strangers, picked to live in a house, and have their lives taped, to find out what happens when people stop being polite, and start getting real.
[After the jump: TheStreet.com's memo.]
Earlier: Insider Trading At CNBC: The Plot Thickens Imperceptibly
[John Carney contributed to this article.]


From: members@thestreet.com
To: [Redacted]
Subject: An Important Notice about “Beat the Street”
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:14:07 -0400
Memo From TheStreet.com
Dear readers:
Since our founding, TheStreet.com has strived to maintain the highest integrity in all of our pursuits. This is especially true with initiatives that involve our readers.
On April 2, TheStreet.com launched its first-ever stock market trading game, “Beat the Street,” which ran until May 31. The Game was intended to allow participants to try their hands at stock investing in an environment as realistic as possible, with a cash prize of $100,000.
The final results of the Game indicate that players employed trading strategies to achieve returns that could not be duplicated in the real world, thereby depriving other contestants of an equal chance to win.
To ensure the integrity of future games, TheStreet.com has established additional safeguards to help level the playing field for all participants. Anyone found to be violating the rules will be disqualified.
There will be no cash prize awarded to any players for their participation in the first game. Instead, TheStreet.com will add the money from the first “Beat the Street” game to the grand prize of “Beat the Street 2.0,” which will now total $150,000, with players of the second game eligible for additional weekly cash prizes.
I invite you to participate in the soon-to-launch “Beat the Street 2.0″ game.
All participants of the first game are eligible to participate in “Beat the Street 2.0.”
Good luck with your trades, and please remember to watch for our daily updates on TheStreet.com site.
Let’s stay interactive.
Dave Morrow

Comments (16)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 12:18 PM

    “ARE NO GAMES RUN VIA THE INTERNET SACRED ANYMORE??????”
    and
    “anal is the new blow job”
    someone’s winning the tagging game.

  2. Posted by Anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 12:27 PM

    fucking dbags

  3. Posted by Anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 12:38 PM

    what are these illegal thestreet.com game trading strategies?

  4. Posted by anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 12:51 PM

    Is it a crime to win these contests using insider information?

  5. Posted by anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 1:15 PM

    Is insider trading a bad thing?

  6. Posted by Anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 1:33 PM

    I think that some academics would even argue that insider trading makes fictional markets more efficeint

  7. Posted by Alex T | June 12, 2007 at 2:08 PM

    These contests are pretty easy to rig – find a totally illiquid penny stock, put it on your buy list and proceed to bid it up in the real market (using real money). Price goes up, you win the comp and it cost you less to jack the price than you won in the competition. Simple.

  8. Posted by Alex T | June 12, 2007 at 2:08 PM

    These contests are pretty easy to rig – find a totally illiquid penny stock, put it on your buy list and proceed to bid it up in the real market (using real money). Price goes up, you win the comp and it cost you less to jack the price than you won in the competition. Simple.

  9. Posted by Alex T | June 12, 2007 at 2:09 PM

    These contests are pretty easy to rig – find a totally illiquid penny stock, put it on your buy list and proceed to bid it up in the real market (using real money). Price goes up, you win the comp and it cost you less to jack the price than you won in the competition. Simple.

  10. Posted by Alex T | June 12, 2007 at 2:09 PM

    These contests are pretty easy to rig – find a totally illiquid penny stock, put it on your buy list and proceed to bid it up in the real market (using real money). Price goes up, you win the comp and it cost you less to jack the price than you won in the competition. Simple.

  11. Posted by Anonymous | June 12, 2007 at 2:37 PM

    Seems like a big risk market manipulation to win a cnbc contest
    would make a funny made for tv movie tho

  12. Posted by Jamie.BuchersGhost | June 12, 2007 at 3:33 PM

    Alex T
    ……the CNBC contest had a market cap minimum… i’m pretty sure it was $500 Million…so that probably wasn’t the case with there’s.
    Not sure about thestreet.com’s…but that seems like something they would have also employed…or perhaps i’m giving them waaaaaaay to much credit
    -JBG

  13. Posted by david g | June 12, 2007 at 5:42 PM

    Alex T’s idea would work for sure. Another idea would be to short every stock before it goes ex dividend. Im sure their little game won’t make you pat the hypothetical div that you owe? I could research this if I cared enough.

  14. Posted by Lee D | June 12, 2007 at 6:03 PM

    As I understood it from the news article, he main scam in the CNBC contest was people leaving browser pages open with unexecuted sell orders until after 4pm when they knew whether the closing price was up. CNBC.com read those orders as coming in before the closing bell, and processed them. Taking advantage of shitty IT.

  15. Posted by Anonymous | June 13, 2007 at 9:37 AM

    This thing is pretty vague. Where people trading on inside information, or did they find an arbitrage-able loophole in the way the contest was set up?
    I think it must be the second. Who can tell what’s just a nothing-to-lose punt and what was based on inside information?

  16. Posted by Mark B | June 15, 2007 at 12:23 AM

    But I saw the top guy at the street was at 700,000,000. That is more than just ex-dividends.
    Anyways, a new game is out at http://www.wallstreetsurvivor.com. it seems pretty good with Real-time bid/ask fills.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.