Investment bankers at one of the banks advising Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp on the bid for Dow Jones & Company celebrated last night when news broke that the Bancroft family had agreed to meet with Murdoch. The bankers had advised News Corp not to increase its offer for the company, defying speculation that Murdoch might attempt to buy-off the Bancroft’s reluctance to sell with more money. Last night’s announcement by the Bancrofts that they would meet with News Corp and consider offers for the company was taken as a vindication of the bankers advice, a source working at one of the advisors to News Corp said.
“It was big smiles all around. High-five time,” the banker told DealBreaker. “We told them not to offer a dime more. We always thought these people would cave.” According to the banker, it literally was 'high-five' time, with arms extended and hands slapping in celebration of the Bancroft move.
Instead of offering more money Murdoch has for weeks engaged in what some have called a “charm and promise” strategy—asking for a meeting to introduce his family to Bancrofts, praising the companies media properties, promising to invest money to grow the Journal’s international bureaus and offering assurances of editorial independence. Everything, that is, except a higher bid.
Murdoch’s $5 billion bid came in at a sixty-seven percent premium to where the company’s shares had traded just prior to the news of his unsolicited offer. Many observers thought the family was holding out for more money before they would agree to meet with representatives of News Corp. Investment bankers advising News Corp on its bid recommended against offering more money prior to a meeting.
“The first rule of deal club is you don’t negotiate with yourself. There were no other bidders, and they wouldn’t come to the table. Was Murdoch supposed to outbid his own offer?” the banker said
One danger of offering more money prior to the opening of negotiations was that the new offer might be looked at by the Bancroft’s as a starting price, setting expectations for an even higher final selling price. A sixty-five dollar second offer might set the stage for a seventy-dollar closing price, the banker said his firm warned News Corp.
The investment bankers believed that eventually the Bancrofts would negotiate with Murdoch without the prompting of a higher offer. The term they used was “over-determined” to describe what they viewed as the most likely result, the source said. The source cited several factors putting pressure on the Bancrofts to negotiate, including pressure from public shareholders and institutional investors, dissent within the family, the absence of a competing bidder, the lack of a credible internal business plan to raise the share price near Murdoch’s offer, fear the Murdoch could withdraw his offer, declining advertiser enthusiasm for newspapers and consolidation in the business news industry.
“This is a win for Murdoch and News Corp and we’re just glad we helped them get here,” the banker said.






Posted by anon #2 , Jun 01, 2007 2:09PM
One of the more interesting looks into a deal we've had in awhile. This is why I started coming here. Let's stay with it.
Posted by Boring , Jun 01, 2007 2:30PM
It's been funny to watch Dealbreaker wet their collective drawers over this deal. Apparently the financial media does not realize the financial community aren't as interested in the financial media as the financial media are.
Posted by , Jun 01, 2007 2:35PM
well, it is nice to at least see posts about deals again, but notice really the biggest deal is any post about bess levin's social life. or posts by bess about deals where there is later a comment about bess levin's social life. this site would probably lose 3/4 of its readership without the lowest common denominator factor
Posted by , Jun 01, 2007 2:38PM
not that there's anything wrong with that. all online media outlets are just schills for the click-through. love it or leave it. a girl's got to pay her bills!
Posted by SDH , Jun 01, 2007 3:17PM
WOW! IF THEY'RE CELEBRATING BECAUSE THE BANCROFTS DECIDED TO THINK ABOUT IT, I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT THEY WOULD DO IF THE BANCROFTS DECIDES TO BEND OVER FOR MURODCH. DON'T COUNT YOUR CHICKS BEFORE THE EGGS HATCH KIDZ
Posted by joe , Jun 01, 2007 4:07PM
I'm with SDH on this one. Everyone now is acting like they accepted the deal. I saw a report saying some family members are furious about the statement put out. I want to know who the people paying over $60 for DJ today are. I'm half tempted to buy some long date deep out of the money puts in case the Bancrofts decide not to "cave".
f' investment bankers anyway
Posted by joe , Jun 01, 2007 4:10PM
I'm with SDH on this one. Everyone now is acting like they accepted the deal. I saw a report saying some family members are furious about the statement put out. I want to know who the people paying over $60 for DJ today are. I'm half tempted to buy some long date deep out of the money puts in case the Bancrofts decide not to "cave".
f' investment bankers anyway
Posted by anon anon , Jun 01, 2007 4:13PM
Who will give Murdock a run for his money? He hates wasps and rich heirs.
Posted by JimK , Jun 02, 2007 10:01PM
Faulty premise with this article which is told only from the perspective of the Murdoch investment bankers. Some big names represent the Bancrofts. IF someone comes along with a competing big, now that the door has been opened, the Bancrofts will spit Murdoch out. Monday's meeting is only about editorial integrity. And ultimately, the Bancrofts aren't going to accept the first offer.