ABN Amro’s board decided over the weekend to withdraw its formal recommendation for a bid by Barclays, but it was only half-serious, and they were winking at the time (though that may have just been an involuntary spasm resulting from getting grapefruit in their eyes, which stings quite badly). ABN’s chief executive Rijkman Groenink said today that he supports the offer by the British bank and may formally recommend it to shareholders later, just not now, even though he sort of just did.
Groenick commented that "We continue to support the Barclays offer because we believe overall it is to the benefit of shareholders and stakeholders,” and the ABN-A board “still believes in the strategic rationale of the Barclays bid,” but they’re still “neutral.” So “neutral,” in fact, that they “acknowledged”—yes “acknowledged” numbers—that the 38.40 euros/ABN Amro share being offered by rival bidder Royal Bank of Scotland-Fortis Group of Belgium-Banco Santander Central Hispano is “higher” than Barclay’s proposed 35.73 euros/share. Because they're "neutral."
ABN's Chief Expresses Support for Barclays's Bid [WSJ]
Board to Remain Neutral in Bids for Dutch Bank [NYT]
Posted by SDH , Jul 31, 2007 12:52PM
Yup! corporate 4play!! don't ya just love it? So being that Barclays is the one making the bid does this mean ABN Amro will play bottom to Barclays' top?
Posted by chris , Jul 31, 2007 12:58PM
Still wating for o'neill to catch a fly ball in his hat.
Posted by Give-up Agreement , Jul 31, 2007 1:13PM
Europeans are so damned annoying.
Posted by anon anon anon , Jul 31, 2007 1:27PM
who is getting paid by the hour on this one?