It looks like Brian Hunter is getting his way. Yesterday his lawyers asked a federal court to block an energy regulator, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, from filing a lawsuit against him on the grounds that it was infringing on the jurisdiction of another regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This morning the CFTC responded by filing a civil enforcement action against him and Amaranth Advisors.
Our favorite hedge fund newsletter, FinAlternatives, nicely points out the irony.
Hunter and his lawyers may now regret the vigorous defense of the CFTC’s right to bring such charges they put on in court yesterday and in court filings on Monday. During those proceedings, Hunter’s attorneys argued that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission did not have the authority to bring civil charges against him, as it had said it intended to do. The CFTC and FERC collaborated on the Amaranth investigation.“FERC is not [emphasis in original] statutorily authorized to regulate futures markets for energy commodities, which include natural gas futures contracts,” Hunter’s lawyers wrote in their complaint against FERC. “FERC’s assertion of jurisdiction to bring an enforcement action is an impermissible encroachment on the exclusive statutory jurisdiction of the CFTC, and is beyond the scope of FERC’s statutory authority to regulate wholesale energy markets.”
A similar lawsuit from FERC is expected to be announced later today.
Amaranth, Hunter Hit With Market Manipulation Charges [FinAlternatives (free registration required)]
Complaint Against Amaranth Advisors and Brian Hunter [pdf]






Posted by Zbignew , Jul 25, 2007 1:37PM
Seriously, if you wrote this stuff in a novel, everyone would say it was far-fetched.
Posted by anon , Jul 25, 2007 1:52PM
So how was he allegedly manipulating the market? I don't think they're even accusing him of high closing, let alone trying to corner the market. Apparently he was hammering the bids on contracts that he was already short? So what? That may be idiotic and irresponsible but it is not illegal.
Posted by jt , Jul 25, 2007 2:08PM
also, and I may be mistaken as my understanding of the finer points of futures regulation and law are a little spotty, but if he just dumped positions at the close because he thought another player was going to make moves to hurt his positions, thats called protection, not market manipulation, and is perfectly legal.
Seems this is more a question of why Nick Maounis gave Hunter carte blanche with the firm's assets, and apparently authority to circumvent any risk controls the bank had. Which is a question of obscene greed and stupidity, of course.
full article on bloomberg
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahhxs8JBVejM&refer=home
Posted by , Jul 25, 2007 2:10PM
jeha what exactly IS this lawsuit about?