Brian Hunter Vows To Fight!
Disgraced Energy Trader Denies Manipulation Charges

brianhuntersuedcftc.jpg"Brian Hunter simply did not undertake any manipulative trading and we are going to prove it,” said Michael S. Kim. Kim is a partner at the Kobra Kai dojo Kobre & Kim lawfirm that advises Hunter’s new hedge fund, Solengo.

Earlier today the CFTC filed a lawsuit charging that Hunter, who was trading gas for Amaranth at the time, had illegally manipulated the natural gas futures market by exploiting the New York Mercantile Exchange’s rules for determining the settlement price on futures contracts. Prices for futures contracts are set according to the volume-weighted averages of trades executed during between 2:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. on the last day of trading for each contract, a period known as the “closing range.”

According to the CFTC’s lawsuit, Hunter attempted to push the price of the futures contracts down by dumping large amounts of the contracts into the closing range. The complaint states that Amaranth traders would buy up large amounts of gas contracts prior to the closing range, then dump them in order to depress prices. Amaranth wanted lower prices because it held a huge short position in the contracts, the CFTC report alleges.

Hunter’s lawyers say that the contention that Amaranth desired lower prices prices is contradicted by a recent report from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which they say concluded that Amaranth sought rises in natural gas futures prices.

“None of these various government bodies can come up with a consistent theory of Mr. Hunter’s alleged misconduct because in fact there was no misconduct” said Mr. Kim, “These accusations from the CFTC and the FERC against Brian Hunter are aimed at finding a scapegoat to bear the public outrage over ever-increasing energy prices. We will not stand idly by as the regulators use Brian for political cover, their action is meritless and we will prove it.”

After our review of confidential trading documents, which you may download here,* DealBreaker has concluded that Brian Hunter should tell us whether he wanted to inflate or deflate the prices in the gas futures markets while he was making these trades. Pointing out that the government is confused, inconsistent and probably abusing its power is a bit like pointing out that the Pope is Catholic. That’s what governments do.

But just because the government is out to get you, doesn’t mean you didn’t do anything wrong. So come on, Brian, give up the goods. Was Amaranth after a higher or a lower price?

*We're totally kidding about those confidential documents. Sorry.

Comments

Posted by anon, Jul 25, 2007 4:00PM

Kobre & Kim's argument makes them sound either very stupid or very desperate. Yes, those idiots in the Senate are totally confused by simple concepts and think that Brian Hunter is to blame for the rising cost of non-renewable natural resources. And Amaranth WAS betting on an eventual rise in natural gas prices. However they also had a short position since it was a calendar spread. Amaranth wanted the price of natural gas to first go lower and then go higher. They wanted natural gas for delivery in April 2006 to go down and delivery in March 2007 to go up. CFTC must be accusing Hunter of "high closing" his short position in the April 06 contracts. It makes sense. Instead of causing April 06 closing prices to fall he could have caused March 07 prices to rise, but it is easier easier to manipulate the prices of front month contracts since those tend to be less liquid. With this investigation it looks like Brian Hunter just might beat his own record for the dumbest trading strategy in history.

Posted by jt, Jul 25, 2007 4:10PM

Sadly thats very true (hunter being an idiot trader), but the question remains why Nick Maounis gave him that much autonomy, authority to circumvent risk management protocols, and money with which to throw into this ass-awful strategy.

Posted by NotNasser, Jul 25, 2007 5:29PM

Hmmmm. Hunter tells FERC "you can't come after me, because this issue belongs exclusively to the CFTC." Then he tells the CFTC, "you can't come after me, because your theory is different from that of the staff of a Senate committee."

When he dies, he'll probably tell Screwtape, "you can't come after me, because your furnaces aren't burning natural gas."

The CFTC claims he was playing Nymex off against ICE. Sort of like he is now playing CFTC off against FERC? It didn't really work the last time.

Posted by roger, Jul 25, 2007 7:16PM

I am going to do some really complicated math for y'all.

Amaranth lost like what... 3 billion dollars?

Natural Gas went..um... down.

Erego... I will predict that Amaranth was wanting the market to go.... up... thus not LOSING 3 billion dollars when it went down.

I could be totally wrong. I'd hate to think the FERC and NYMEX have it wrong and I am right. that would be embarassing for them.

Posted by Bulging Bracket, Jul 25, 2007 8:08PM

Roger: They wanted a widening spread, and it narrowed. So they got screwed. Of course the government can't get its shit together and actually figure out what happened, cause no one who works their has the mental capacity (if they did, they wouldn't be working for the government).

Given Hunter's previous genius moves, I can easily see him being this stupid. Everyone knows not to do this so obviously, but everyone also knows not to place as huge a spread bet as he did. Compliance and risk management is a pain in the ass, but they are there for a reason. Nick is a tool for not making Hunter live within the rules. All the subsequent investors in their separate funds are bigger tools.

Posted by jt, Jul 25, 2007 9:27PM

recipe for disaster:

3 cups hubris (or arrogance substitute)

4 tablespoons not learning from history (e.g. LTCM)

1 unexperienced lead trader

1 manager dsperate to keep said trader and returns up

Post Your Comment