hedgefundmetdownrumors.gifRumors have been swirling around about two separate hedge fund meltdowns. According to one set of rumors a multi-strategy hedge fund facing impending doom due to leveraged bets in credit derivatives. Entirely different sources have mentioned a major meltdown from natural gas bets. DealBreaker calls to some of the usual suspects could not confirm the identities of the allegedly troubled funds.
And we’re not naming the names being whispered because life is hard enough without getting called out on DealBreaker as a meltdown candidate when things might be going just fine.
Both rumored meltdowns are plausible given recent market movements. The credit markets have been rocked by a level of volatility unseen in recent times. Earlier today Bloomberg reported that many large financial institutions believe that hedge funds are using too much leverage to finance credit derivative investments, according to a Fitch
Ratings survey of 65 banks, insurers and money managers.
Natural gas futures prices are flat to down, and the spread between summer-winter season is narrowing. The spreads in future contracts fell from $2.50 to pennies in two weeks. Similar movements in the markets for natural gas futures helped bring down Amaranth last year.
If you’ve got a likely candidate for either rumor—natural gas or credit derivative blow-up—feel free to leave a comment below or email us at tips@dealbreaker.com
Derivatives Banks Concerned by Hedge Fund Leverage Bloomberg]

Comments (18)

  1. Posted by abe | July 17, 2007 at 6:45 PM

    Not naming names? Very undealbreakerlike, feeling okay? If you bastards are getting out of the rumor mongering business the terrorists (and Solengo) have won.

  2. Posted by Anonymous | July 17, 2007 at 7:12 PM

    i’m starting to like you guys.

  3. Posted by Dave Chappelle | July 17, 2007 at 8:00 PM

    Basis Capital Funds Management

  4. Posted by jake | July 17, 2007 at 9:14 PM

    yeah wtf no names?

  5. Posted by homer J simpsons | July 18, 2007 at 3:00 AM

    No it’s not basis cap, this is public information that they are melting down.. Must be somebody else!

  6. Posted by Dreamer | July 18, 2007 at 4:04 AM

    Could it be Tom Hudson? I mean I know he hasn’t traded either NG nor credit derivs at Pirate but I guess a man can hope, can’t he?

  7. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 7:35 AM

    you post a rumor like this every few weeks, nothing ever comes of it are you just fishing??

  8. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 7:35 AM

    you post a rumor like this every few weeks, nothing ever comes of it are you just fishing??

  9. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 7:38 AM

    ps if you already have the rumored names why do you want us to speculate on them? seems cruel.

  10. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 8:07 AM

    natty…not a meltdown. Just a little problems with the cftc and douchebag management overselling AUM.

  11. Posted by John Carney | July 18, 2007 at 8:38 AM

    Hey guys,
    The questions you raised in comments were fair enough so I’ll take a moment to address them.
    1. We didn’t name names because we honestly didn’t have enough basis to build on. We’re not going to impugn the reputation of some fund manager just because someone can spell his name in the same sentence as meltdown.
    2. This is a bit of a fishing operation. But not in the way you implied. We heard two different rumors and spent several hours trying to get to the bottom of them. When we get stuck without any further substantiation, we decided to go ahead and see if any of our readers had more information.
    3. The point that “nothing ever comes of it” isn’t quite fair. See, for instance, our mid-May reports of rumors of a troubled hedge fund. We never got to the bottom of that one but three weeks later, the manager of those now infamous Bear Stearns hedge fund sent a letter to investors telling them that the funds had taken major losses in April. The details don’t match what we were hearing and this could be purely coincidental, of course.
    4. We think there is a value to reporting that a rumor is going around. If lots of people are talking about something it can take on a life of its own regardless of the underlying reality. So we think that it makes sense to report on the rumor. We just try to make clear that we’re not substantiating the rumor or claiming it’s true. Just that it’s going around. We think our readers are sophisticated enough to understand this distinction.

  12. Posted by Bubba | July 18, 2007 at 8:48 AM

    Yea, you guys leave John alone! Notice he didn’t say it wasn’t Tom Hudson, that should give us all hope that it very well may be….

  13. Posted by abe | July 18, 2007 at 9:46 AM

    What about the children? Won’t somebody please think about the children?!

  14. Posted by pirate emeritus | July 18, 2007 at 9:47 AM

    tom is actually doing fairly well this year i believe. i wont comment on his character, but realistically the only problem with that hedge fund was compensation. everything else was on point.

  15. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 9:52 AM

    Thanks for following up JC.
    i’m surprised nobody has said yet it is syks

  16. Posted by Carl Icon | July 18, 2007 at 10:00 AM

    If Sykes’ fund fails it would’ve been above the Onion’s fold.

  17. Posted by Anonymous | July 18, 2007 at 10:54 AM

    Fine, right now hearings its Lehman

  18. Posted by Anonymous | August 16, 2007 at 1:17 PM

    Caxton?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.