Huge Tools of the Week: Getting out of Jury Duty

justice_bz_detail.jpg Here is the latest installment of the new DealBreaker feature, Huge Tools of the Week. The feature is designed to provide the financial community with additional resources, from fledging online utilities to the name of a good 24-hour rub 'n tug establishment (Starbucks does close, after all). You can see past huge tools here. Send any toolkit to: tips at dealbreaker dot com.

A partner at my old PE firm used to say, "Smart people don't get put on a jury." After seeing several of his associates get picked off for the 3-day minimum obligation in the span of a couple months, he was a bit miffed. Serving on a jury is no picnic as a finance drone. It basically means starting your workday when you leave the courthouse. We've known more than a few I-bankers who've had the worst weeks of their lives while on jury duty. It turns out senior associates and VPs lack a real shared sense of civic responsibility.

I had my strategy all set - self incrimination. If I got called to voir dire, I would just start sputtering off nonsense about how I hated Homo sapiens, especially those of the defendant’s persuasion (kind of like the Curbed episode). Fortunately, it was a slow day in court, and I only got called to be a prospective juror once, and even then did not get interviewed to sit on the jury. Most of the people in my prospective juror “class” (Wednesday), got released early after 2 days (although I may or may not have pretended this did not happen, and spent Friday in a bar watching World Cup games…the HR people are as blind as justice sometimes).

It turns out the self-incrimination strategy may not be as foolproof as cynical members of society may have thought. A Cape Cod man trying to get out of jury duty by acting like a racist homophobe this morning was taken into custody for a couple hours and may face criminal charges (wow, I wouldn’t want to serve on that jury).

What’s fantastic is a transcript of the conversation between the man, Daniel Ellis and Barnstable Superior Court Judge Gary Nickerson, from CNN:

GN: You say on your form that you're not a fan of homosexuals?
DE: That I'm a racist. I'm frequently found to be a liar, too. I can't really help it.
GN: I'm sorry?
DE: I said I'm frequently found to be a liar.
GN: So, are you lying to me now?
DE: Well, I don't know. I might be.
GN: I have the distinct impression that you're intentionally trying to avoid jury service.
DE: That's true.

Also notable is CNN’s amazing box-summary of “Story Highlights”:

-Daniel Ellis really, really doesn't to want to serve as a juror
-He tries to get out of it, saying he is homophobic and a racist
-He also says he's a liar
-Judge is appalled, refers case to prosecutors

We'd never advise you to get out of jury duty. It's your civic duty, and all that. Also, we're vaguely afraid that it might be illegal to give that kind of advice. But, if you are going to try to talk your way out of the jury pool, our advice is to do it subtly. During voir dire, don't follow the path of obvious idiocy. Be a subtle racist homophone. Start telling rambling stories, like how in the latest Transformers flick, you enjoyed the fact that Michael Bay killed off Negrotron, the only black Autobot (unfortunately this is true…I still weep over the execution of that film), or that you think all Mexicans are [insert what defendant is charged with here] serial jaywalkers. We understand your hesitancy to serve on the jury. Who wants that 15 hour day to become a 19 hour day?

Jury duty excuse: I'm a racist, homophobic liar [CNN]

Comments

Posted by KJ, Jul 10, 2007 2:54PM

This is an old trick. I've known several people who have avoided jury duty by sharing their feelings about blacks, Latinos, etc. I know one guy who, when challenged, used FBI stats to bolster his argument (e.g., blacks are 9X more likely than whites to commit violent crimes, Hispanics are way overrepresented in DWI cases, etc.). Of course, it worked!

Posted by jt, Jul 10, 2007 2:54PM

pretty sure what CNN describes has happened before, and years ago if that. Might also have been the subject of a hoax story or joke sent out @ some point too.

What they need is to make jury duty a free-market system, where upon being forced to serve it you could just trade with someone else and/or purchase a get out of jail free pass of sorts. This would ensure that in fact, (most) smart people truely wouldn't sit for jury duty.

Posted by , Jul 10, 2007 2:57PM

yes ... but did he have to serve on the jury?

Posted by Jamie.BuchersGhost, Jul 10, 2007 3:41PM

Since they don't mail those things "Sig required"....what happens if i accidentally lose the letter driving out of the post office on a windy day with the top down....

Posted by Anon, Jul 10, 2007 3:52PM

While I get that 90% of i-bankers (analysts) are less clever than cancer cells, I still thought they'd be too smart to be selected for a jury. Lawyers after all, look for people who: don't read the news, don't have the remotest knowledge of the law, etc. If someone polled juries on the most common professions of its members, you'd probably find that they have far less intellectually demanding jobs than the Excel-spreadsheet monkeys.

Post Your Comment