NEWSCORPDOWJONESRUPERTMURDOCHWALLSTREETJOURNALSMALL.JPGWhen Wall Street Journal’s Sarah Ellison broke the story late Monday that Dow Jones chief executive Richard Zannino and News Corp’s Rupert Murdoch reached a tentative agreement over lunch to bring the News Corp’s bid for Dow Jones before the board of directors, many were surprised that the offer price hadn’t budged from original $5 billion, or $60 a share.
They shouldn’t have been. Throughout the months since Murdoch first approached Dow Jones representatives with his offer, advisers to Murdoch have coached him not to increase his bid. Early on some thought he might increase the price in an attempt to overcome resistance from some members of the Bancroft family. But Murdoch’s investment bankers advised him that it was foolish to bid against himself, raising his offer at a time when the Bancroft’s had not yet indicated that they were willing to sell at any price.
Some of Murdoch’s advisers believed that a higher, second bid might have actually invited a competing bid for the company if it was seen as Murdoch’s best offer. By sticking to the original bid, Murdoch may have discouraged other potential bidders who were not sure they could outbid the deep pockets of a cash rich News Corp.
Even after negotiations with the Bancroft family began, some observers thought Murdoch might increase his bid. “While the initial $60-a-share offer represents a hefty premium over where Do Jones’s stock was trading before Mr. Murdoch’s offer became public, Dow Jones hopes the Bancroft family’s ambivalence about the Murdoch deal could help the company extract a few more dollars per share,” Ellison writes in her story today.
The thinking in the News Corp camp, however, runs completely in the other direction. The Bancroft family had already extracted value from News Corp in the form of promises of editorial independence, and had dragged out the negotiating process—taking up time and energy from Murdoch and his advisers. These discussions and concessions have been seen as part of the price News Corp was paying to buy Dow Jones. In effect, they were counted as increasing the cost of the deal.
What’s more, the Bancroft family’s continued ambivalence despite the negotiations and concessions has frustrated Murdoch and his advisers. The view within the Murdoch camp has been that as long as the Bancroft family continued to resist selling the Dow Jones for non-financial reasons, there was little point in increasing the financial incentives.
“The Bancrofts kept saying that this wasn’t about the money,” one person familiar with the News Corp strategy said. “Murdoch decided to take them at their word.”
While initially trading higher this morning, the stock dropped today to its lowest level since the Bancroft family first agreed to meet with Murdoch at the end of May. This may indicate traders now believe that Murdoch will not offer a higher price than his original bid.
Dow Jones, News Corp. Set Deal [Wall Street Journal]

Comments (30)

  1. Posted by vast right-wing conspiracy | July 18, 2007 at 12:31 AM

    WSJ is no longer going to be worth the paper that it’s printed on.
    Switch to FT today! A better paper, and not yet controlled by a far right-wing subversive propaganda machine!
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428

  2. Posted by crork | September 10, 2012 at 1:26 AM

    druJn6 Very good blog post.Thanks Again. Great.

  3. Posted by free cams | September 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM

    wow, awesome blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  4. Posted by Buy Twitter Followers Cheap | September 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM

    I really liked your post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  5. Posted by $1 web hosting | September 14, 2012 at 8:26 AM

    Major thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  6. Posted by Get your social media profiles liked by loads! | September 14, 2012 at 12:53 PM

    Very neat article. Keep writing.

  7. Posted by Dog Poo | September 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more.

  8. Posted by dr. reena feider | September 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post. Much obliged.

  9. Posted by home owners insurance quotes | September 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  10. Posted by TDAP Vaccine Side Effects | September 18, 2012 at 8:45 AM

    I truly appreciate this article.Much thanks again. Want more.

  11. Posted by TDAP Vaccine Side Effects | September 18, 2012 at 10:31 AM

    Major thankies for the article post.Much thanks again.

  12. Posted by Erotismo | September 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the article post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  13. Posted by 1001 Bonnes Affaires | September 18, 2012 at 6:49 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article post. Cool.

  14. Posted by replacement awning | September 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  15. Posted by Technique | September 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM

    Thanks so much for the article. Cool.

  16. Posted by whois search | September 20, 2012 at 5:36 AM

    Major thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  17. Posted by nyc iphone unlock | September 21, 2012 at 10:16 PM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog post. Great.

  18. Posted by internet advertising | September 22, 2012 at 1:37 AM

    Great blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  19. Posted by a good multivitamin for men | September 22, 2012 at 5:24 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  20. Posted by best porn site | September 23, 2012 at 11:56 PM

    I am so grateful for your article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  21. Posted by best chiropractic kitchener | September 24, 2012 at 9:21 AM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the blog.

  22. Posted by Quality Auto Detailing Wichita Kansas | September 25, 2012 at 5:55 PM

    Awesome blog post.Thanks Again. Great.

  23. Posted by stage hypnosis | September 26, 2012 at 12:12 AM

    Hey, thanks for the article.Really thank you! Great.

  24. Posted by Peter Francis-Macrae | September 26, 2012 at 7:34 PM

    Thanks a lot for the blog article. Really Cool.

  25. Posted by inkjet cartridges | September 30, 2012 at 6:13 PM

    Thanks a lot for the blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  26. Posted by ink cartridge | September 30, 2012 at 7:33 PM

    wow, awesome article. Really Great.

  27. Posted by hp 300xl | October 1, 2012 at 1:01 AM

    Very good blog.Thanks Again. Want more.

  28. Posted by Drivers Ed Material and Training | October 7, 2012 at 3:14 PM

    The topic is pretty complicated for a beginner!…

  29. Posted by Black Friday kindle fire HD Discount | October 16, 2012 at 12:10 AM

    Many thanks for creating the effort to discuss this, I feel strongly about this and like learning a great deal more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your webpage with a great deal more information Its extremely beneficial for me.

  30. Posted by cash advance | October 16, 2012 at 9:25 PM

    Does your site have a contact page? I’m having trouble locating it but, I’d like to send you an email. I’ve got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it improve over time. This is my website cash advance