Not Good Advice

Pomeranian.jpgWe’re all for reducing the institutionalized love between a man and a woman down to dollars and cents and “fuck, you, I get the Pomeranian, you get the kids!” That should be obvious at this point. And, also, far be it from us to take issue with the math skills of others when we’ve never professed to be number-inclined people ourselves. But when it comes to protecting your assets, we do what’s necessary. So: New York’s advice today re: bear market divorces maybe ought to be avoided.

As you well know, unless a prenuptial agreement was signed, divorce laws in New York state that each spouse is entitled to half of all income earned. According to Nancy Chemtob, the lawyer consulted for the piece, if you think you’ll your salary and bonus will be smaller next year, you should get out “now!” (like, today), when you still have a decent amount of coin. Because “why be forced by the courts to split less money”? Well—maybe so that you can keep as much for yourself (and wives 2, 3, 4, 5) as possible, and out of the hands of that money-grubbing whore? Regarding the recommendation to call it quits *before* you get laid off by Bear (Global Alpha, etc), attorney Susan Bender told New York: “we have some pretty savvy judges in New York,” who may be onto your game, aptly named, “The fact that I found this advice to be sound is reason enough for me to get nailed by my ex and banned from ever working with money—my own and other people’s—again.”

Bear Market? Dump Your Wife [NYM]

Our own advice: tweak ever so slightly so that the marital (-dissolving) counsel is directed at the wives of Wall Street. Then you've got gospel.

Comments

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 12:32PM

hey Bess,

Isn't the advice given from the (presumably earning 0, aka "fashion plate") wive's perspective, not that of the man with with the dough?

If the woman files for a divorce now, won't she be awarded a better settlement now rather than next year when her former hedge fund manager husband will be taken to the cleaners by investors?

Posted by gr, Aug 27, 2007 12:35PM

no, because the advice is directed at the men: "The shaky stock market and subprime disaster have some divorce attorneys advising their clients to pull out of marriages (now!) as a way to cut losses on future payouts. “I was talking with one of my clients the other day, and I told him, ‘You don’t need to ride the market and your wife,’” says attorney Nancy Chemtob."

Posted by mini ballerette., Aug 27, 2007 12:36PM

my thoughts exactly. in that case the man would want to split less money...

ps i know you're writing primarily for men but its a little low to call wives money grubbing whores in any case

Posted by TL, Aug 27, 2007 12:37PM

plus, the headline is "dump your wife"...

Posted by hello?, Aug 27, 2007 12:39PM

uh, "money grubbing whores" seems like it was a joke, given the original article

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 12:40PM

yeah... imagine a guy who pays his ex-wife a ton of money, then gets shafted by his investors, etc. That's the man who, if he ever gets married again, can be certain that his new wife truly loves him for who he is.

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 12:42PM

the article is confused...they richer you are when you get divorced, the more money you have to give away. and it's directed at them men, otherwise the headline "dump your wife" is very progressive

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 1:06PM

this is from the article:

“I was talking with one of my clients the other day, and I told him, ‘You don’t need to ride the market and your wife,’” says attorney Nancy Chemtob, who represents fashion plate Tory Burch, who filed for divorce from her venture-capitalist husband, Christopher Burch, last year.


NYMag definitely messed around with the quotes. It doesn't make sens why the lawyer would tell the Wife client, "‘You don’t need to ride the market and your wife,’...the wife IS the client.

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 1:17PM

Agree:

‘You don’t need to ride the market and your husband,’”
would make much more sense.

Man, Nancy Chemtob, what a bitch! Is this a brutal advice or what?

Check out all of your wife's friends named "Nancy" tonight. Better preempt this now than marry again solely for love later.

Posted by , Aug 27, 2007 1:22PM

By "preempt" I meant find out whether your wife is already talking to an attorney, and bullet-proof your finances accordingly.

Posted by Walter, Aug 27, 2007 1:35PM

Fucking dog has fucking papers. Over the line!

Posted by Anal_yst, Aug 27, 2007 1:45PM

Further strengthing the rationale for buying property in Switzerland and/or Grand Cayman

Post Your Comment