The first week of August has been a tough month for many quant funds, including Jim Simons' Renaissance Technologies. In a letter to investors today Simons warns investors that results in the RIEF vehicle are down 8.7% in August alone.
In the letter Simons echoes a theory that has gained widespread popularity on Wall Street for what we’ve been calling the “quant bloodbath.” That theory holds that some hedge funds have liquidated equity positions to reduce risk uncovered recently in less liquid credit instruments, and that these liquidations have caused the markets to behave in ways not predicted by the computer models used by the quant funds. Because many of the funds use similar models to predict market movements, the buying and selling triggered by these abnormal movements have triggered even deeper losses, according to the theory.
“While we believe we have an excellent set of predictive signals, some of these are undoubtedly shared by a number of long/short hedge funds. For one reason or another many of these funds have not been doing well, and certain factors have caused them to liquidate positions,” Simons writes. “In addition to poor performance these factors may include losses in credit securities, excessive risk, margin calls and others. All of this may not influence the direction of the overall market, but it may certainly alter the relationships of stocks to each other in a dramatic way. Given the undoubted partial overlap of our portfolios, these liquidations have had a negative impact on RIEF.”
Of course, reports are that the news this morning has been somewhat better for the quant funds.
Since many believe that the problem began with CDO valuations held by hedge funds, the theory is now being called the the "Subprime StatArb contagion theory" by folks with little poetic imagination.
The complete text of Simons’ letter after the jump.
JIM SIMONS LETTER TO INVESTORS
Dear Renaissance Investor,
As promised in my July letter, posted today on the RIEF website, I want to share some thoughts on August-to-date performance in order to provide perspective on a most unusual period.
RIEF results through July 31 were below expectations, but not extraordinarily so. I’ve previously stated that the low volatility Basic System, to which our predictions are added, was not in sync with the market during much of this period. Nonetheless, we remain confident that over time the Basic System will match the return of the S&P and, enhanced by our predictive signals, should exceed it. Since we do not attempt to track this or any other index there will be periods of positive and negative relative returns.
August (down 8.7% through today) is a different story. The culprit is not the Basic System but our predictive overlay. While we believe we have an excellent set of predictive signals, some of these are undoubtedly shared by a number of long/short hedge funds. For one reason or another many of these funds have not been doing well, and certain factors have caused them to liquidate positions. In addition to poor performance these factors may include losses in credit securities, excessive risk, margin calls and others. All of this may not influence the direction of the overall market, but it may certainly alter the relationships of stocks to each other in a dramatic way. Given the undoubted partial overlap of our portfolios, these liquidations have had a negative impact on RIEF.
Other examples of such liquidations are the meltdown of risk arbitrage positions in the October 1987 crash, the forced liquidation of junk bonds around 1990 and the collapse of European bonds in 1994. Some of these were in the midst of a bear market, some not.
Such events tend to occur extremely infrequently. We cannot predict the duration of the current environment, but usually such behavior causes first pain and then opportunity. While we may hedge out some market risk, our basic plan is to stay the course and, as conditions revert to the norm, we anticipate the possibility of an attractive opportunity for RIEF. Our firm remains strong, and although Medallion has experienced some losses in August, it is solidly profitable year-to-date.
We are confident in our approach, and we urge you to contact our staff should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jim Simons






Posted by matt , Aug 10, 2007 3:53PM
Carney is the best...
Wait, so people actually can do something right without computers/asians?
Posted by JD , Aug 10, 2007 3:59PM
I expected Simons to look like the professor from "Back to the Future"
Posted by anon , Aug 10, 2007 4:02PM
But what did the stationary look like?
Posted by Bill , Aug 10, 2007 4:04PM
there was a professor on Back to the Future?
Posted by lev fin banker-ette , Aug 10, 2007 4:04PM
Strong posts Carney
Posted by S , Aug 10, 2007 4:04PM
Nicotine stained.
Posted by 8======D~~ , Aug 10, 2007 4:15PM
I expected him to look more like Joe Camel
Posted by yippeee , Aug 10, 2007 4:16PM
GS Global Alpha on the tape, down 26% nin 2007
Posted by Anon , Aug 10, 2007 4:22PM
Hedge Funds dont always just go up!!! People lose money sometimes!?
Posted by JD , Aug 10, 2007 4:23PM
Anybody know how Insana Capital Partners is performing? He seems to be on CNBC a lot more lately, probably wants his job back.
Posted by anon anon anon , Aug 10, 2007 4:35PM
So Helicopter B is doing what he believes works. Pour money on problems and they vanish. He happens to be right. As long as you have cash or credit you can keep on playing until the price of houses recover and then you just keep on playing. During this 2/3 year spell those without the cash/credit die.
Posted by anon anon anon , Aug 10, 2007 4:51PM
summary of Simons' letter: "I did not fuck up. The market fucked up. I want to continue trying to making money off (I love you) you." At least he kisses his investors as they get screwed.
Posted by , Aug 10, 2007 4:52PM
"While we believe we have an excellent set of predictive signals, some of these are undoubtedly shared by a number of long/short hedge funds. For one reason or another many of these funds have not been doing well, and certain factors have caused them to liquidate positions."
I can imagine the investor letters from those long/short hedge funds blaming their performance on RenTech.
Posted by heebanker , Aug 10, 2007 5:52PM
anyone know how SAC is doing?
Posted by tt , Aug 10, 2007 6:46PM
Insana Capital up 18% ytd
$134 capital..... go Ron !!!
Posted by T.Fluoride , Aug 12, 2007 5:25PM
Gee! Can smart guys lose money too ? Thanks for the rationalization. Attention all quants , applied mathemeticians , market neutral geeks, etc....investing is as much an art as it is a science. Have your model call my model and we'll model lunch sometime.
Posted by im a bigshot , Dec 03, 2007 7:30PM
Sounds like LTCM to me.