In case you missed the Crameruption on Friday:

Cramer’s main points:
-The Bear guys should shut their dirty, whorish mouths
-Bernanke should get on a Bear Stearns call and stop being an “academic”
-But, Bernanke has “NO IDEA!”
-People talk to Jim Cramer, especially in the last 72 hours
-It’s bad out there, contrary to the Jim Cramer of 3 weeks ago, who was saying CDO holders would be made whole and calling for buys in the financial sector
-The Fed is asleep!
-Jim Cramer worked in fixed income at Goldman Sachs, which is like having a pair of scissors made out of paper-covered rocks and trumps any other form of argument or rational thought
-Jim Cramer knows too many people and is too darn old
-So old, that he knows of a President named Hoover

Comments (42)

  1. Posted by Series7.5 | August 6, 2007 at 10:34 AM

    “-Jim Cramer worked in fixed income at Goldman Sachs, which is like having a pair of scissors made out of paper-covered rocks and trumps any other form of argument or rational thought ”
    brilliant, so true

  2. Posted by Dennis Green | August 6, 2007 at 10:35 AM

    Good one KH!

  3. Posted by LippyTex | August 6, 2007 at 10:41 AM

    HBS Booyahs for the GS fixed income comment!! Right on the money!!!

  4. Posted by Former Eye-Patch Wearing Joker | August 6, 2007 at 10:54 AM

    I hate him, anyone else?

  5. Posted by Dan Drofman | August 6, 2007 at 10:55 AM

    I don’t hate him, I just wish he’d stop screaming when he’s on TV.

  6. Posted by Jan | August 6, 2007 at 10:59 AM

    I think he sucks.

  7. Posted by Anonymous | August 6, 2007 at 11:05 AM

    Who is Ron Paul?!

  8. Posted by inIT4the$ | August 6, 2007 at 11:07 AM

    nice one Keith

  9. Posted by Random Banker | August 6, 2007 at 11:13 AM

    Cramer is actually a good investor, his on screen antics are a little unbearable but alas, we are not his target audience. At any rate, I miss his old radio show where the commentary was twice as good and screaming with 1/10th as frequent… mean while how many times do you think he’s done Erin Burnett… i’m thinking twice… maybe 3 times.

  10. Posted by Former Eye-Patch Wearing Joker | August 6, 2007 at 11:17 AM

    Research done on his stock picks has actually shown that he is wrong quite a bit more than he is right. As for Erin, I hope she’d stick to a higher class guy….Rick Santelli anyone?

  11. Posted by Former Eye-Patch Wearing Joker | August 6, 2007 at 11:19 AM

    I wanted to share my associate’s opinion after I asked him if Cramer was on drugs noting that rates do not need to be dropped.
    “I like how he refers to the stock market as “out there,” as if white
    collar traders losing a couple percent is somewhat tantamount to
    soldiers fighting in a war. And a rate decrease would at best be a
    temporary fix, which would set us up for another, steeper decline in the
    future… at which point cramer would argue the rate needs to go to LESS
    than 0%. Conclusion: yes cramer is on drugs.”

  12. Posted by Anonymous | August 6, 2007 at 11:33 AM

    LOUUUD NOISES!!!!

  13. Posted by Random Banker | August 6, 2007 at 11:37 AM

    Eye-Patch Wearing Joker: The problem with “research” done on cramer’s stock picks is that the research don’t understand them, or him, and most likely they can’t invest their way out of a paper back otherwise they wouldn’t be doing “Research”.
    Cramer’s picks have to be taken for what they some times he has a well researched trend that in spirit of Peter Lynch that I would never have exposure to Crocs… for exams…. plastics shoes… what’s the deal with that anyway? This something he is a trend he has done significant analysiss on You can’t compare that with when someone calls up and asks how do you feel about Joe’s boat company and Cramers says… well they have a PE of 7x and they’re growing at 15% a year BUY BUY BUY. One opinion is worth more than the other just based on the amount of analysis done but the researchers who follow the show don’t take context into consideration. Cramer should be used like a good stock screener he constantly track huge number of stocks and lead you ideas that you wouldn’t normally find yourself. Then you do your own analysis and decided whether this idea is worth while Also his insight into the buying and selling patter of institutional investors is also quite useful to those of us from the corporate finance side of the business.
    All that being said, the real proof is in his track record at Cramer Berkowitz you don’t perform that well for that long if you’re incompetent.

  14. Posted by HKP | August 6, 2007 at 11:40 AM

    Why do people pay attention to this charlatan?
    (I think he meant RuPaul.

  15. Posted by Random Banker | August 6, 2007 at 11:43 AM

    You type like a jackass and it’s not hard to surround yourself with smart people and look smart

  16. Posted by Former Eye-Patch Wearing Joker | August 6, 2007 at 11:47 AM

    Random Banker:
    I second Random Banker (part deux?) that you type like a jackass and that Cramer may just know a lot of smart people. More so, Cramer shouldn’t go blowing his buy buy buy horn to people’s life savings if he hasn’t done the research and doesn’t know the real story….that’s typical Wall St. “screw the consumer” bull

  17. Posted by Finbar Taggit | August 6, 2007 at 11:51 AM

    Cramer is a local – has he ever left the USA? Does he have a passport?
    Doesn’t he realise the USD is falling fast and rates need to be increased rapidly, not cut.

  18. Posted by Former Eye-Patch Wearing Joker | August 6, 2007 at 11:56 AM

    Shhh, I am an expat currently working in London (paid in £), dropping rates and killign the dollar works for meeee

  19. Posted by huh? | August 6, 2007 at 11:58 AM

    For God’s sake man, it’s only money.

  20. Posted by duck! | August 6, 2007 at 12:04 PM

    cramer’s wife was the brains at C-B cramer was the ears & mouth … btw her last great trade was shorting cramer

  21. Posted by Lee D | August 6, 2007 at 12:15 PM

    I don’t understand why CNBC’s wardrobe department chose to dress her up like a giraffe that day.

  22. Posted by anne winn | August 6, 2007 at 12:46 PM

    Ron Paul is not the six foot three drag queen. He is the only Republican presidential candidate worth voting for.
    Congressman Paul’s grasp of the massive fraud perpetrated on the American pulbic and his willingness to discuss it is enough to make him universally dispised by political hacks and corporate jackles alike.

  23. Posted by Ajax | August 6, 2007 at 1:22 PM

    #1, exchange rate policy is not part of the Fed’s mandate; FX is the responsibility of the Treas. Dept.
    #2, with the U.S.’s budget and trade deficits, the fall of the dollar is exactly what should be happening.

  24. Posted by Ajax | August 6, 2007 at 1:36 PM

    anne’s a perfect example of the loony lefties who like ron paul. why don’t you ask your boy about the 400mm in earmarks he’s requested for wild shrimp farms in galveston?
    also, it seems most ron paul fans have trouble with eighth-grade spelling (dispised? jackles?). ron paul probably thinks the Trilateral Council and Illuminati are really pulling the strings in the administration.

  25. Posted by de Cosmos | August 6, 2007 at 1:39 PM

    Does all this mean it isn’t contained?

  26. Posted by HKP | August 6, 2007 at 1:40 PM

    No, I’m pretty sure he meant RuPaul.

  27. Posted by slimjim | August 6, 2007 at 1:47 PM

    I think anne serviced me last time I went to the run-n-tug in Hartford. Great bbbj

  28. Posted by Anonymous | August 6, 2007 at 1:53 PM

    As long as RuPaul/RonPaul votes against Grassley’s legislation to tax my carry at ordinary income instead of capital gains, I’ll vote for him.

  29. Posted by Anono | August 6, 2007 at 2:41 PM

    Anoymous 1:52,
    Schumer is going to kill that bill. You are safe.

  30. Posted by Random Banker | August 6, 2007 at 3:40 PM

    I do type like a jackass… i normally proof read but am busy today.

  31. Posted by jt | August 6, 2007 at 4:07 PM

    any guesses on Cramer’s blood pressure?

  32. Posted by dennis gren | August 6, 2007 at 4:10 PM

    great title btw

  33. Posted by Janus Daniels | August 6, 2007 at 4:15 PM

    Ron Paul is the only R candidate remotely honest about attacking\occupying Iraq, and therefor the only one who can be even remotely honest about economics.

  34. Posted by Endtimes Jones | August 6, 2007 at 4:17 PM

    May the US economy collapse completely soon!

  35. Posted by Calgary Schmooze | August 6, 2007 at 4:34 PM

    The reporting of Cramer’s blood pressure requires the use of a large metric prefix.

  36. Posted by Sherwood | August 6, 2007 at 5:59 PM

    Ron Paul will never be President because we could never pay enough money to buy his support and thus have him in our pocket.
    Those candidates who refuse to submit and support us will never see a nickel of our money, and cannot win without it.
    Sorry RuPaul.

  37. Posted by DutchessOfDerivatives | August 7, 2007 at 1:24 AM

    “Research done on his stock picks has actually shown that he is wrong quite a bit more than he is right. As for Erin, I hope she’d stick to a higher class guy….Rick Santelli anyone?”
    Rick Santelli is a nasty slob.. trust me, i know.
    No better than Cramer.

  38. Posted by peter | August 7, 2007 at 2:17 AM

    Bernanke is going to let the dollar collapse. How else will they introduce our new currency: the “Amero”

  39. Posted by Bend5 | August 7, 2007 at 7:59 AM

    Cramer was just upset he blew up along with everyone who called him.

  40. Posted by Ajax | August 7, 2007 at 1:16 PM

    Some no-name congressman is supposed to have the answers on Iraq? All that time on the Financial Services Cmte will come in handy in trying to solve the problems of the Middle East. There is zero chance this guy can distinguish Sunni from Shiite Islam. In fact, both parties should ban these fringe jokers from the debates and let the top 3-4 have a more useful discussion for the American public.

  41. Posted by anon | August 8, 2007 at 1:17 PM

    “I don’t understand why CNBC’s wardrobe department chose to dress her up like a giraffe that day.”
    Because Cramer is a zoo animal?

  42. Posted by kw | August 8, 2007 at 9:00 PM

    Cramer’s excitement can definitely go over the edge sometimes. You have to filter it out and listen to the content of his message.
    The Fed has been too slow to increase / decrease interest rates which is evident when you look at a plot of fed funds rate by quarter fior past 7 years. An interest rate decrease might be warranted to keep further ARM’s from going into default. Speculative housing investments in coastal areas (e.g. Florida) have been reduced which is good.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.