Alwaleed, Minaya Stand By Their Men, In Spite of Men’s Colossal Failures

chuckprince.jpgHere’s a tip for those of you concerned about a fast-approaching expiration date on your job—see if you can put in an application for either CEO of Citigroup or manager of the Mets, two positions in which you can apparently fuck things up beyond anyone’s wildest dreams and still not get fired. Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, C’s largest individual shareholder, said that he totally backs the management of Citi (i.e. Chuck Prince), and that the bank’s 60 percent slump in third-quarter profit, perhaps due in part to a $1.4 billion writedown, was a “mere hiccup,” not unlike the Exxon Valdez oil spill—basically just a blip.

In fact, the only thing that’s been keeping the Saudi prince up at night is the question of across which medium “World’s Greatest CEO” should be printed—a mug or a t-shirt? Mugs are always a safe bet because there’s no question about size (Chuck isn’t really that big though his shoulders are pretty broad), but T’s are just so much more festive! Anyway, details. Alwaleed predicts that the Citi Prince will “normalize” performance in the fourth quarter.

Meanwhile, Mets GM Omar Minaya told reporters yesterday that he “believes” in manager Willie Randolph. Rather than focus on the fact that he blew a seven-game lead with 17 games left in the season with unparalleled rapidity, we should dwell on all the good stuff Randolph’s done in the past three years. There’ll be a sit-down with the Wilpons, sure, but that’s just to smooth (kind of unjustifiably) ruffled feathers and make sure that Willie sticks around for the rest of his two-year, $4.25 million contract. Minaya predicts that Randolph will lead the Mets to victory in next year’s World Series.

If only there were a safe place where these two seemingly unrelated organizations could get together and speak freely of their common love and commitment to keeping horribly inept management in power (and doling out handsome rewards for such impressive failings and pratfalls). Oh, right—Citi Field, the (soon-to-be, in 2009) new home of the New York Mets (thank you for the salt, David Weidner). But don’t write off The Palace of Personal Responsibility, the naming rights for which Citi is coughing up roughly the equivalent of three years’ salary for a certain 88-win team, as simply a place where losers can celebrate their manifold losses just yet. Let’s remember that it’s also the site of Shake Shack II. And we can all agree that it’s easy to let bygones be wretched, disastrous bygones over a double Shack burger.

Citigroup Third-Quarter Profit Slump a `Hiccup,' Alwaleed Says [Bloomberg]
Mets GM Minaya won't fire Randolph [Newsday]
Citigroup and the Mets collapse [MarketWatch]

Comments

Posted by Jack Mahogoff, Oct 02, 2007 12:17PM

Love the "Prince" references re Citi and the Mets. Sounds like you're giving them "Raspberry Berates"!

Crackin myself up.

Posted by , Oct 02, 2007 12:44PM

its a little embarassing that every time citi farts, prince aliwali has to come out and defend its strategy and CEO

Posted by MG, Oct 02, 2007 12:56PM

My three theories:
1. Prince Alwaleed bin Turban is actually an economic terrorist trying to wreck our capitalist meritocracy by maintaining mediocrity atop Citi.
2. He has a very nice plane, a certain "itch," and he's trying to get Maria BJ's number from Todd Thomson's confiscated Citi blackberry.
3. Hey, princes gotta stick together (and he doesn't realize that Chuck's is just a family name).

Posted by , Oct 02, 2007 1:10PM

so what happened with keith?

Posted by , Oct 02, 2007 1:17PM

he left for personal reasons if carney is to be believed

Posted by , Oct 02, 2007 1:18PM

Bess, stick to finance. Your mets analysis is off.

Posted by , Oct 02, 2007 1:24PM

she was reported undisputed facts about the mets, what are you talking about, 1:18?

Posted by Defender o'Bess, Oct 02, 2007 1:24PM

Bess' analysis is fine. The Mets are like a Rorschach test - everyone interprets the team's nightmare failure through the prism of their own experience.

Posted by Kahnspiracy, Oct 02, 2007 1:34PM

So whats the deal? Keith gets drafted in to DB at short notice when John gets nailed by a car and laid up in hospital, and now he appears to have trickled off into the ether. DB doesn't even recognise the departure? I notice his biography is no longer on the "about" page, come on DB, you call out everyone else for lack of standards then seem to toss Keith aside with no thanks or explanation.

Posted by A little bird..., Oct 02, 2007 1:54PM

A little bird told me that Keith did not leave for personal reasons, unless personal reasons include getting canned because the investors were pinching pennies and couldn't afford to keep him on full time. Also word is that he got fired without any notice via email.

The writing on the wall was that it was kind of a mini-coup, and that they tried to replace him (and still are) with Myrna.

The drama continues...

My two favorite Keith posts -

http://www.dealbreaker.com/2007/07/great_moments_in_financial_his.php

http://www.dealbreaker.com/2007/01/the_2007_wharton_lauder_instit_1.php

Posted by Kahnspiracy, Oct 02, 2007 2:11PM

"the investors were pinching pennies and couldn't afford to keep him on full time."

"Also word is that he got fired without any notice via email."

"kind of a mini-coup, and that they tried to replace him (and still are) with Myrna."

The drama continues...

This is so ironic, given that this is what DB normally reports on, the diabolical machinations of big business, yet DB needs to look no further than their own doorstep!

Post Your Comment