Chuck Schumer Will Tax The Rich (But Not 'Til After Next Year's Election)

ilovethisguy.jpgSenator Schumer plans to introduce legislation to raise taxes on private equity executives, hedge fund managers and a slew of other rich people. “My intent is to raise the most revenue and do it in a fair way,” Chuck said. “My bill will certainly raise the taxes on people who not get 15 percent for carried interest, for sure.” Though he did not share whether or not the individuals currently privy to paying only 15 percent on carried interest would have to pay 35 like normal people, he did suggest that the political wisdom that says you can’t raise taxes on the wealthy—which Schumer referred to as “old bugaboo”—is no longer valid.

In the past, Schumer’s been against any proposals that he felt unfairly singled out minorities (women, blacks, private-equity firms, hedge funds), by stripping them of their right to keep more of their money than other people. Now he claims to want to “treat everyone across the board,” and says he isn’t afraid to raise taxes on the rich in order to level the playing field. The only thing he may be afraid of is not getting an invite to Jim Chanos’s next 4th of July clambake, the last one at which he was heard saying “I’m still thinking about it,” re: taxation on HF managers and “I’ve never gotten why people would want to eat mussels. There’s too much work involved, too labor intensive. I don't want to be breaking a sweat while I’m eating."

Schumer Says He'll Sponsor Tax Rise on Fund Managers [Bloomberg]

Comments

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 3:59PM

Chanos’s = Kindergarten.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:02PM

what does that mean, 3:59?

Posted by 3.59, Oct 03, 2007 4:08PM

the punctuation of a 5 yr old.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:11PM

nope. b/c chanos is singular, in which case an 's' goes after the apostrophe, you dumb fuck. take an english class.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:11PM

Ahh, now I get it. Because the actual party was not much like kindergarten and a lot more like drinking, plastic trophy wives, and Bess sneaking off to the dunes with Chuck Schumer. True story.

Posted by 3.59, Oct 03, 2007 4:13PM

Please revist the rules of puncuation, 'dumb fuck'.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:13PM

i would definitely sneak off to the dunes with any chick who writes the line "I’ve never gotten why people would want to eat mussels. There’s too much work involved, too labor intensive. I don't want to be breaking a sweat while I’m eating" and attributes it to Chuck Schumer.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:16PM

the rule is that if it's a singular, you do apostrophe and then and 's.' if it's plural apostrophe and no 's.' revist those rules before you try to correct someone's correct punctuation and embarass yourself. oh and how sad are you, posting your gpa as your name? seems like maybe that number is actually more of a reflection on how many brain cells you have.

Posted by 3.59, Oct 03, 2007 4:18PM

Not for Proper Nouns, dumbass.

Embarassing myself?

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:19PM

you remain wrong. that's why we write Bess's and not Bess'

yes, you're still embarassing yourself.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:20PM

To make a singular noun (or proper noun) possessive, add an apostrophe s (or just an apostrophe if the word ends in an "s." )

* (possessive singular) pro's
* (possessive singular) James's

To make a plural noun (or proper noun) possessive, add an apostrophe.

* (possessive plural) pros'
* (possessive plural) Jameses'

http://www.authorpower.com/stories/storyReader$35

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:23PM

"If the word ends in an s but is singular, practice varies as to whether to add 's or only an apostrophe."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:24PM

Respected sources require that almost all singular nouns, including those ending in s, z, or x, have possessive forms with an extra s after the apostrophe. Examples include the Modern Language Association, The Elements of Style, and The Economist[5]. Such sources would demand possessive singulars like these: Senator Jones's umbrella; Mephistopheles's cat.

Posted by Mike Hunt, Oct 03, 2007 4:30PM

You guys are seriously outa hand with this stuff. Its a finance tabloid (blog), but I guess their mission of outsourcing copy editing is far more of a success than they could have ever hoped.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:33PM

Mike, aren't you the guy who wears a Casio calculator watch and drives a 1955 Jaguar?

Posted by inIT4the$, Oct 03, 2007 4:34PM

Wow, this got way out of hand...you idiots spent half an hour going back and forth about sssssssssssss. (Yes I know it should be "has gotten") See now you have me doing it, damn!

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:35PM

The only exception to the rule mentioned by 4:24 is biblical names. seriously. yes, I'm a lawyer, i have nothing better to do.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:38PM

Classical, biblical, and similar names ending in an s sound, especially if they are polysyllabic, do not take an added s in the possessive; among sources giving exceptions of this kind are The Times[9] and The Elements of Style, which make general stipulations, and Vanderbilt University,[10] which mentions only Moses and Jesus. As a particular case, Jesus' is very commonly written instead of Jesus's, even by people who would otherwise add 's in, for example, James's or Chris's; Jesus' is referred to as "an accepted liturgical archaism" in Hart's Rules.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:42PM

booooooring
Bess, you are quite a fox, but why do you attract these anal worshippers?

Posted by Jason, Oct 03, 2007 4:51PM

If anything good came out of today's grammar lesson it's that 3.59 has more than likely given up his hobby of attempting to be the class know it all.

Moral of the story: If you're going to publicly correct somebody, you better damn well be right!

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 4:53PM

Jason, you are boring too.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 5:03PM

silly me to think that 20 comments on a post about raising taxes on the rich was more than a grammar flamewar

Posted by ccs, Oct 03, 2007 5:06PM

Heh, heh. He said, "anal." Heh, heh...

Posted by Jason, Oct 03, 2007 5:12PM

@ 4:53

Heh...I'm crushed. Really.

Posted by , Oct 03, 2007 5:15PM

Schumer will never follow through on this. Never.

Posted by Mike Hunt, Oct 03, 2007 5:15PM

Longines watch and a 1987 Toyota Corolla. Runs great for 273k miles

Posted by 3.59, Oct 03, 2007 6:28PM

motherfucker....my bad.

Post Your Comment