Quants on Fire: The Anatomy of Bloodbath

We're not going to say that we totally let our subscription to MIT Technology Review lapse. But if we had, we'd totally be signing up to renew it now. The latest issue carries a story that gives one of the most "my grandmother would understand this" friendly accounts of the August quant bloodbath.

The basic driver of the story is the Rothman theory. It doesn't name names or pin the tail on the fund whose unwinding equity positions sparked the bloodbath—hey, why don't we know who this was yet?—but it does set out how young men armed with computers managed to bring the markets to their knees this summer.

The Blow-Up [MIT Tech Review via Paul Kedrosky]

Comments

Posted by joe, Oct 19, 2007 12:45PM

The Quants didn't bring the market to their knees, they merely exacerbated an unfolding situation. The markets were brought to their knees by the combination of reckless monetary policy leading to reckless borrowing leading to reckless lending leading to even more reckless borrowing and ultimately to a house of cards that collapsed upon itself.

Quants were idiots, they were too large and too levered with too many of the same positions other quants, but they didn't cause the crisis, only made it worse.

Posted by just me, Oct 19, 2007 1:33PM

yeah, its society's fault then....maybe all the fired bankers/traders etc need to get gov't counseling, subsidized housing and job counseling

Posted by The Quant Apologist, Oct 19, 2007 1:47PM

Let's be mature here. Quants are highly educated financial engineers who just got on the wrong side of about $10 billion in trading losses. It wasn't their fault. It was some dang "model" that caused the financial disaster. Come on now people. You have to respect intellectual capital.

Posted by , Oct 19, 2007 2:40PM

too bad CDOs are not derivatives tho - this is the most over generalized piece ever

Posted by , Oct 19, 2007 3:51PM

Anonymous 2:40, CDOs ARE derivatives you dumbass. Even an index fund is a derivative.

Posted by , Oct 19, 2007 5:15PM

Anonymous 3:51, easy with the language. Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

Posted by , Oct 20, 2007 12:47AM

nah, you were right 3:51.. 2:40 is a stupid ass.

that statement was pretty idiotic.

Post Your Comment