Barclays was not lying last week when it categorically shot down scurrilous reports that it was about to take a $10 billion writedown, a denial the bank backed up this morning when it announced a writedown of only $2.7 billion on investments related to the subprime mortgage market. Of course, when they said there was “absolutely no substance to those rumors,” they meant to say “those rumors are only 27 percent correct,” but whatever: details. How do you like Barclays now? Probably not as much as Barclays likes itself. “Today’s extensive disclosure demonstrates the strength and resilience of our performance during the year and in particular during the turbulent month of October,” chief executive John Varley said in a statement.
Incidentally: You should watch this

Earlier: Barclays: $10 Billion Writedown Rumor Has As Much Merit As The One About James Cayne Smoking Dope
Barclays Writes Down $2.7 Billion on Mortgage Losses [Bloomberg]
A stitch in time [Breaking Views]
Barclays Ends Speculation Over Subprime Exposure [WSJ]

Comments (17)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 12:29 PM

    Thank God.

  2. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 12:35 PM

    bess, what’s a JCBJTM

  3. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 12:42 PM

    I’m going with John Carney Blow Job.

  4. Posted by Anal_yst | November 15, 2007 at 1:29 PM

    Curious why there isn’t more talk in the media that these “writedowns” are basically nonsense. Essentially the decision these banks are making in choosing the size of these announcements amounts to the ‘optimum’ point between making it big enough to be believable that the worst is over, yet small enough so that it “could have been worse”. The true value, is, of course pretty uncertain.

  5. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 1:32 PM

    thanks for that stunning insight, anal_yst

  6. Posted by The LOL Guy | November 15, 2007 at 1:39 PM

    LOL!

  7. Posted by adsense sucks | November 15, 2007 at 1:48 PM

    i cant fuckin believe these pikers! everyone talks like they deserve addtl bonus for navigating the “turbulent times”? worst since great depression? you fuckin losers who made the mess and collected those fees before this?
    fuckin out

  8. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 1:55 PM

    How tall is Carney? He looks kinda short in the pic.

  9. Posted by WDE | November 15, 2007 at 4:10 PM

    Hey anal_yst, if you’ve actually tried to get into the market and sell some of this puke, you’d know that the actual market value of these things lies somewhere in between a box of your grandmother’s old mothballs and leftover meatloaf.

  10. Posted by Anal_yst | November 15, 2007 at 4:30 PM

    @ 1:32 – suck it. Everyone knows it, but who’s actually saying it? Where are Mike Mayo’s balls when ya need him?

  11. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 4:32 PM

    anal_yst…your comment was about how the media’s not saying the writedown shit is “nonesense”…did you read this post before you wrote that?

  12. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 5:14 PM

    Can we please stop with the Mike Mayo worship around here?

  13. Posted by Anon E Mouse | November 15, 2007 at 10:42 PM

    What a relief…but wait didnt they say their total exposure to subprime was only $75m in the FT a month ago ? lol

  14. Posted by Anonymous | November 15, 2007 at 11:03 PM

    Wasn’t Mike Mayo quoted in the paper as saying he cried once, while doing his job? I mean, real tears.

  15. Posted by Anal_yst | November 15, 2007 at 11:41 PM

    Aight gents
    1. DB doesn’t count as “the media” in the sense I was using it, more speaking of CNBC and other MSM. Analysts (including that douche Mayo), flapping heads, pundits or whatever you call them HAVE NO IDEA.
    2. All I was trying to say is its funny that anyone takes the value of these writeoffs, etc with anything more than a grain of salt. As some of you have pointed out, these things are essentially worth jack shit, so these announcements are arbitrary at best, yet in the MSM they’re treated as if they might as well be mark-to-market writedowns.
    3. Mike Mayo is a vagh, as are all the other analysts.

  16. Posted by cdo structurer | November 16, 2007 at 11:03 AM

    i’m a recent graduate and just recieved a job offer from a major bulge bracket firm to join their cdo structuring group. with all thats going on right now, should i accept the offer?
    thank you.

  17. Posted by cdo structurer | November 16, 2007 at 11:04 AM

    i’m a recent college graduate and just recieved a job offer from a major bulge bracket firm to join their abs cdo structuring group. with all thats going on right now, should i accept the offer? i hear merrill is a big underwriter.
    thank you.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.