Lawyers Prosecuting Credit Suisse Banker Ambivalent About Whether Or Not They're Going For A Guilty Verdict

Former Credit Suisse investment banker Hafiz Naseem pleaded not guilty yesterday to allegations that he was "the mastermind" behind a $7 million insider-trading ring in which he leaked details about nine deals that Credit Suisse was an adviser on, including the $45 billion leveraged buyout of TXU. The prosecution's foolproof rebuttal? Naseem had a gambling problem, and was up to his toes in $5,000 of debt, which is totally a plausible reason for committing a $7 million felony. Geniuses. (A lawyer for Naseem has denied these accusations as well, saying that while the $5,000 debt part of the story is true, the gambling part is not. It was a heroin thing, and was taken care of in a completely legal fashion.)

Credit Suisse Case Shocker [NYP]

Comments

1

Posted by Bad Leg Quezada , Nov 27, 2007 12:00PM

Alleged felonies in the energy business???? I am shocked !! Shocked I say !!!

What is Oscar Wyatt up to these days?

2

Posted by nice bess , Nov 27, 2007 12:03PM

It was a heroin thing, and was taken care of in a completely legal fashion.

3

Posted by , Nov 27, 2007 12:03PM

has nothing to do with the energy industry except by coincidence that this dude was an energy banker

also, doesn't the defense usually rebut the charges, not the prosecution?

4

Posted by go read DealBook , Nov 27, 2007 12:05PM

"also, doesn't the defense usually rebut the charges, not the prosecution?"

yes, and taking caring of heroin-related debt is generally done in an illegal way.

5

Posted by The Ghost of J. D. Rockefeller , Nov 27, 2007 12:10PM

Sure are a lot of "coincidences" in that energy business.

Since 2001, If the energy industry found as many bbls and mmbtus equal to the amount of fines the industry has paid and hard time its former employees will have to serve....well..... there would be no energy crisis.

What's Jeff Skilling up to these days?

6

Posted by , Nov 27, 2007 12:11PM

if i am not being obtuse,, 12:05, you are suggesting that "The prosecution's foolproof rebuttal" is a joke based on switching the prosecution with the defense, and not a typo, is that correct?

7

Posted by , Nov 27, 2007 12:12PM

um, yes, 12:11, that's exactly what i'm doing.

8

Posted by HAM'05 , Nov 27, 2007 12:13PM

12:11 you just blew my mind!!!

9

Posted by , Nov 27, 2007 12:22PM

What is CS paying these clowns? $5,000 is debt? If a guy that can't handle a $5,000 debt is involved in sensitive information that can lead to charges like this, one of two things is the the case (or both): 1) CS woefully underpays; 2) CS needs to better manage their information.

10

Posted by Nashunul Geograffic , Nov 27, 2007 12:28PM

$5,000.00 buys a lot of Axe Body Spray for those Afghan weddings.

11

Posted by , Nov 27, 2007 12:38PM

maybe all his loot is tied up in illiquid mortgage investments ... wouldnt be the first time an investor was driven to drastic measures to fund his ongoing operations because of market factors

12

Posted by Okey-Dokey, All-Righty Then, You Betcha! , Nov 27, 2007 12:49PM

Saw "Fargo" again the other night on the AMC and this thread reminded me of the scene where the character played by William H. Macy, the car salesman, is getting GMAC to buy his "paper" on car sales that never happened. Pure genius.

13

Posted by To Wit , Nov 27, 2007 1:44PM

When I was 7 years old, my grandfather sat me on his knee and gave me the greatest business advice I have ever received. He said 'Don't do business with the people that fuck camels'.

Post Your Comment