• 28 Nov 2007 at 1:52 PM
  • Banks

So Uncool

We at my apartment (so me and Marissa) have heard that the invasion of employee privacy by Wall Street firms has taken a bold step forward: hacking into employee Facebook accounts. According to a sometimes reliable, sometimes not source, the human relations department at a certain investment bank has been using creative technology to get into the profiles of current (and prospective) minions, to monitor their off (and on) the clock activities. This is bull shit and I’ll tell you why: it would be one thing, if you and those with the power to get you fired willingly entered into a Facebook friendship, thereby granting them full-access to see what’s a-poppin’ in your personal life whenever they pleased. But this means that someone who doesn’t even have the bedside manner to ask “You wanna do this” first, or worse, someone whose online friendship you’ve formally said no thanks to, can see that you’ve added “Boiler Room” to your favorite movies (sheep) and changed your status from “Billy is working at Bear Stearns” to “Billy is getting a public citation for having relieved himself on the sidewalk in front of Bear Stearns which he wouldn’t have had to do in the first place if those FUCKS hadn’t fired him.” Anyway, try and guess which firm we’re talking about via Facebook message (thereby granting me access to see your profile for one week even if we’re not friends) and I will respond shortly.

Comments (48)

  1. Posted by Matt | November 28, 2007 at 2:05 PM

    err.. Lehman?

  2. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:06 PM

    definitely suntrust

  3. Posted by goldilocks | November 28, 2007 at 2:06 PM

    I have zero problems with banks checking Facebook…if you’re dumb enough to put that stuff on the web, you might be dumb enough to misappropriate information that really matters.

  4. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:22 PM

    no pictures or wall on your limited profile, kiddos. keep to the stuff you actually post yourself. or can they see the full profile?

  5. Posted by publius | November 28, 2007 at 2:23 PM

    I would fire an employee if he/she were on facebook.

  6. Posted by just asking | November 28, 2007 at 2:25 PM

    is bess’s roommate wall street’s lincoln tunnel?

  7. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:33 PM

    Just set up my page.
    Where do I find the dirty pictures?

  8. Posted by MS | November 28, 2007 at 2:37 PM

    Bess word on the street…no pun intended…is that you are extremely hot, when do we get to see a picture?

  9. Posted by HAM'05 | November 28, 2007 at 2:39 PM

    what about those of us that can’t access fbook inboxes from work bc our firms are demi-fascists??
    also i bet its goldman, their nerdy IT heebs will do anything for a chance to to dock* with unsnipped perspective hires
    *http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=docking+urbandictionary

  10. Posted by anon anon anon | November 28, 2007 at 2:42 PM

    Any firm who engages in this type of activity is begging to be sued BIG TIME and they are pissing away the owners money. This would be worse than insider trading from a pr point of view.

  11. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:43 PM

    HAM resurfaces. Check out the athletics pages on hamilton.edu. That place is churnin out some nice boy ass.

  12. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:45 PM

    Speakin of heebs…
    Bess can I be your first facebook friend who’s not a member of the 12 Tribes….

  13. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:46 PM

    Speakin of heebs…
    Bess can I be your first facebook friend who’s not a member of the 12 Tribes….

  14. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:53 PM

    bess went to amherst, so it’s pretty likely she has facebook friends who aren’t jews.

  15. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 2:58 PM

    4 out of 386. Not that I counted….

  16. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:01 PM

    I thought she went to Brown?

  17. Posted by skeptical | November 28, 2007 at 3:03 PM

    It’s as bess as the nose on plain’s face…

  18. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:09 PM

    Do you have to be someone’s friend to see their profile?

  19. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:17 PM

    is your roommate katie or marissa?

  20. Posted by Moho | November 28, 2007 at 3:18 PM

    Bess is friends with Pete Murphy, the whitest boy who ever lived. So I’m pretty sure the ban on gentiles has been lifted :)

  21. Posted by call me crazy | November 28, 2007 at 3:28 PM

    aren’t jews white boys too?

  22. Posted by anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:32 PM

    At this point, we all know Bear Stearns sucks. But really, I’m a little disappointed in Facebook. This sounds like a Facebook security issue.

  23. Posted by you are crazy | November 28, 2007 at 3:33 PM

    no

  24. Posted by tags | November 28, 2007 at 3:34 PM

    how dumb are you guys who are naming bear, suntrust, goldman, etc.? average dumb or actually retarded?

  25. Posted by Also Crazy | November 28, 2007 at 3:41 PM

    If Adam Sandler isn’t white I don’t know who is.

  26. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:42 PM

    Italians arent either. Irish, maybe

  27. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:45 PM

    Dont you be callin HAM ’05 dumb

  28. Posted by BrianVan | November 28, 2007 at 3:48 PM

    It can’t be Lehman. Their firewall blocks Facebook and their IT department is staffed with at least a few mildly retarded people who routinely refuse any requests more complicated than a keyboard installation.
    What’s funny is that all of the above is true and not at all sarcastic. It would be nice if our network could handle espionage! I guess we just have to settle for having the smartest MBS traders out there who aren’t cooking the books.

  29. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:49 PM

    Adam Sandler is not white. There are some jews however that are, who are known as white anglo saxon hebrews. They grew up on Park Ave, went to Temple Emmanuel, etc. They were not raised in Livingstein.

  30. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:53 PM

    isn’t “white anglo saxon” an oxymoron?

  31. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:55 PM

    No it’s redundant and superfluous.

  32. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:55 PM

    sure is, but I suspect the purpose is to make the abbreviation the more pleasant WASP, rather than the harsh ASP. Or in the context here, WASH vs. ASH

  33. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:56 PM

    touche…my bad

  34. Posted by i wish i were HAM'05 | November 28, 2007 at 3:57 PM

    everyone loves HAM’05

  35. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 3:59 PM

    i dunno … ash is pretty white. that would have worked well.
    it is impossible that LEH hr got a special dispensation from the facebook police for recruiting purposes then?

  36. Posted by sound fucking familiar? | November 28, 2007 at 4:06 PM

    I think they missed one with Jute* Jews or JuJus.
    * the Jutes came over with the Angles/Saxon. They had a vastly superior culture but were ethnically cleansed out of existence.

  37. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 4:09 PM

    survival of the fittest i guess

  38. Posted by Lumbergh | November 28, 2007 at 4:17 PM

    Goldilocks and publius, you’re both pathetic corp. drones. No organization has a right to pry into your personal life – online or otherwise – just because they sign your paycheck. It never ceases to amaze me what these firms will do to put themselves in the same school as fascist governments around the world. I expect this from Prince al Waleed’s Citigroup, not from anyone else.

  39. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 4:18 PM

    4:09 your boss probably reports to a heeb.
    If you work for a decent firm.

  40. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 4:19 PM

    @ 4:18 he doesn’t report to any Jutes

  41. Posted by EB in Leather | November 28, 2007 at 4:25 PM

    Due to Bess’s less than spectacular posts and a Bill Simmons marathon chat, I have only clicked on dealbreaker 4 times today. Bess, today wasn’t your best hump day.

  42. Posted by 4:25 is an idiot | November 28, 2007 at 4:35 PM

    “Due to Bess’s less than spectacular posts and a Bill Simmons marathon chat, I have only clicked on dealbreaker 4 times today. Bess, today wasn’t your best hump day.”
    time that couldn’t been better spent killing yourself. maybe tomorrow?

  43. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 5:31 PM

    bess denied my friend request…. fail.

  44. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 5:57 PM

    You were bold to try.
    We’re still waiting for Galahad.

  45. Posted by Anonymous | November 28, 2007 at 5:59 PM

    HAM ’05 @2:39 is clearly an imposter. The real HAM would 1) never confuse prospective with perspective and 2) even though I wish it were not so, have no idea what docking is

  46. Posted by BSD is a dick | November 28, 2007 at 11:14 PM

    “time that couldn’t been better spent killing yourself. maybe tomorrow?” was a classic. It nails my sentiment about hatchet wounds like 4:25pm to a T.

  47. Posted by Smoke and Mirrors | November 28, 2007 at 11:35 PM

    “Bess, today wasn’t your best hump day.”
    Well, that depends on what you mean by hump day.

  48. Posted by ex-gs | November 29, 2007 at 9:38 AM

    It’s not goldman, we make people sign waivers before HCM can look at their stuff. One of our interns brought one as part of the screening.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.