adamsenderbloomberg.jpg
And spare me your “53 percent return for clients after fees this year,” “the shorter the man, the better the performance” bull shit. Adam Sender, pictured here in front of 43 monitors, each one special and unique in its own way, spent $250,000 on pair of totem poles made out of golf bags.



Sender Skips Miami Parties, Buys Art as Hedge Fund Gains 53%
[Bloomberg]

Comments (108)

  1. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 9:38 AM

    adam sender is 5′4″. no joke.

  2. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 9:42 AM

    im 6 screens important

  3. Posted by anon | December 12, 2007 at 9:43 AM

    “Look at the big brain on Brad.”

  4. Posted by Lee D | December 12, 2007 at 9:44 AM

    What kind of golf bags?

  5. Posted by Yo! MG | December 12, 2007 at 9:46 AM

    golf bags, or douche bags? Could have been a typo, ya know…

  6. Posted by Jman | December 12, 2007 at 9:47 AM

    This guy is the K Fed of the hedge fund world. Weak goatee and a general toolbox demeanor.

  7. Posted by O RLY? | December 12, 2007 at 9:48 AM

    I’m 1 screen important but I can alt tab really we… oh, oh wait, I’m not important.
    I do, however, have a beer stein made entirely of old golf gloves.

  8. Posted by MJ | December 12, 2007 at 9:53 AM

    Did anyone notice the large bottle of lube on the left hand side? Obviously the 43rd monitor was reserved for porn.

  9. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 9:55 AM

    According to his firms 13fs, assets went from $230 mil in july to $8 bill in sept.
    Either thats an error, or we live in a much more fucked up world than I perviously thought.

  10. Posted by joe | December 12, 2007 at 9:58 AM

    ask him how shorting RIMM went?

  11. Posted by Phil Seltzer | December 12, 2007 at 9:59 AM

    He uses 92% of his brain.

  12. Posted by girl | December 12, 2007 at 10:01 AM

    Bess, every girl knows little guys try extra hard to make up for their shortcomings (hence the totem poles- very phallic symbol).
    It’s that sort of desperation for more that you want in a $ manager…

  13. Posted by Alfred Nobel | December 12, 2007 at 10:13 AM

    Dynamite comes in small packages.

  14. Posted by Adam'sClosestFriend | December 12, 2007 at 10:34 AM

    I remember him at SAC his ego/assholeness grew with his P&L.
    Yes his is a little guy at 5′4″.
    He’s a whiner, its funny to watch him get angry.
    I still wonder if he was banging his Assistant Lacey? Doubt it.

  15. Posted by Chris G. | December 12, 2007 at 10:43 AM

    This guy could get by with 1/3 of the screens.

  16. Posted by Timmmy | December 12, 2007 at 10:47 AM

    His latest 13F has a ridiculous mistake. They’ve put the number of shares he owns as the total value of his funds. He actually has $215m invested, not $8 billion.

  17. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 10:49 AM

    He really looks kind of annoying. Ladies, what do you think? Is it worth putting up with that face and body given the big bucks there?

  18. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 11:04 AM

    Cut the guy a break. It looks like he cut down on the number of screens. Notice the pole to his left with NO SCREENS on it.
    Oh wait, maybe he’s waiting for the next 4 screens to arrive.

  19. Posted by Calgary Schmooze | December 12, 2007 at 11:13 AM

    That photo needs to be Beaker-ized.

  20. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 11:20 AM

    Who let Sykes on this board

  21. Posted by liking the 53% | December 12, 2007 at 11:23 AM

    what if I already gave him money? Keep it there or take it back?

  22. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 11:26 AM

    dude can’t even report what he owns correctly, you gonna take his word on his returns? (that shit takes multiplication)

  23. Posted by North Jersey | December 12, 2007 at 1:07 PM

    Did anyone catch the bottle of Vaseline and box of tissues on his desk? I guess if you make that much money, and are completely obfuscated behind monitors, you can rub one out at your leisure.

  24. Posted by Anal_yst | December 12, 2007 at 1:07 PM

    @ calgary – absolutely the 1st thing that comes to mind when I look @ that picture.
    Also if the 13f is funked up its likely his dbag lawyer/account’s fault. Although by extension that also makes him a dbag for hiring incompetent help.

  25. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 1:17 PM

    Didnt they have this guy on Sex and the City, he went out with Samantha and bought his suits in the children’s department?

  26. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 1:42 PM

    anon @1:17 True, the label said Bloomingdales Boys Dept. Remember too that he banged her like an animal, which is why it was so difficult for ol Sam to leave him.

  27. Posted by PureGuesswork | December 12, 2007 at 1:52 PM

    I don’t know who this guy Sender is, but you seemed to have posted a picture of Ace Bigelow, male escort.
    Or mebbe Im wrong.

  28. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 1:56 PM

    his cock’s probably 1″ erect

  29. Posted by urall jealous | December 12, 2007 at 2:20 PM

    must make you losers feel impotent, oops i mean important, to snipe about someone who is successful. maybe if you spent more time worrying about your performance you could be spending your holidays on beach at a private island instead of at Santa’s Wonderland at the local Mall.

  30. Posted by Quantster | December 12, 2007 at 2:23 PM

    50% over 200 mm is decent performance, not sure why people dislike him so much!

  31. Posted by hedgistan | December 12, 2007 at 2:37 PM

    Don’t know the guy personally, and don’t care.
    But it is amazing – the personal vitriol in these posts. One has to ask oneself why are so many so angry? Maybe cuz’ Moses is leaving coal in all your Channukah dreidels this year because of YOUR lousy performance?
    Whine all you want, but the if you guys had returned 53% in ‘07 you’d have much better things to do than hang out here and act like such lil’ bitches.
    Anybody posting such negative shit simply expresses how callow and jealous they really are.

  32. Posted by hedgistan | December 12, 2007 at 2:38 PM

    Don’t know the guy personally, and don’t care.
    But it is amazing – the personal vitriol in these posts. One has to ask oneself why are so many so angry? Maybe cuz’ Moses is leaving coal in all your Channukah dreidels this year because of YOUR lousy performance?
    Whine all you want, but the if you guys had returned 53% in ‘07 you’d have much better things to do than hang out here and act like such lil’ bitches.
    Anybody posting such negative shit simply expresses how callow and jealous they really are.

  33. Posted by geezer | December 12, 2007 at 2:40 PM

    Man o man, there’s sho’ nuff’ some some haters out there – guess those year end bonuses won’t be what they were cracked up to be, what with all your lousy annual performance and all…

  34. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 2:56 PM

    looks like he got a bottle of aspirin next to the lube. wonder what thats for.

  35. Posted by anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 2:59 PM

    He’s 5′4″, he has lots of screens, he has a little dick, blah, blah, blah…
    That’s the best you got? Guy returns 50+% NET, and that’s the best you got?
    I’m sure all those delicious tidbits are going to be very helpful while you’re trying to deflect the explanation of your personal poor returns this year to your pissed off investors.
    Yeah, I’m sure they’ll appreciate that. And then immediately cash out from your fund(s), and put it all their $’s into Sender’s.
    Then you’ll all have plenty of time to worry about your height as you bump your heads on the door frame as you’re leaving after you’ve been fired, turn off your one screen for the last time at your desk, and fondle your enormous 13″ long dick in your bedroom all day long after you move back in with your parents because you’re a total failure.
    Have fun!

  36. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 3:00 PM

    He’s 5′4″, he has lots of screens, he has a little dick, blah, blah, blah…
    That’s the best you got? Guy returns 50+% NET, and that’s the best you got?
    I’m sure all those delicious tidbits are going to be very helpful while you’re trying to deflect the explanation of your personal poor returns this year to your pissed off investors.
    Yeah, I’m sure they’ll appreciate that. And then immediately cash out from your fund(s), and put it all their $’s into Sender’s.
    Then you’ll all have plenty of time to worry about your height as you bump your heads on the door frame as you’re leaving after you’ve been fired, turn off your one screen for the last time at your desk, and fondle your enormous 13″ long dick in your bedroom all day long after you move back in with your parents because you’re a total failure.
    Have fun!

  37. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 3:02 PM

    someone sounds pissed. read the bloomberg article. he had losses in ‘06.

  38. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 3:17 PM

    it does look like he got his hands in his crotch. and his pants are all bunched up. maybe he had to relieve the tension before the interview and cameraman arrived. Wanker.

  39. Posted by SAC Breeding Labs | December 12, 2007 at 3:23 PM

    Isn’t this one of Stevie Cohen’s disciples?

  40. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 3:46 PM

    Yeah, someone definitely sounds ‘pissed,’ I’m a dude. Try re-reading the first 20 or so posts. THAT’S ‘pissed!’
    Sender’s losses in ‘06 were something like a grand total of 2% or 3%. Not really worth bringing up at all – unless YOU’RE pissed, right, I’m a dude?
    Why so angry angry, I’m a dude?
    Or should we call you “I’m a dud?”
    And yeah, I’m pretty sure (though not absolutely so) that Sender worked at one time with/for SAC in the 90’s.

  41. Posted by Morty | December 12, 2007 at 3:51 PM

    53% net after fees?
    Jesus.

  42. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 4:01 PM

    Lets be realistic. If yr using the kinds of strategies (and leverage) that results in returns of 53%, you can just as easily loose that much. The smart money asks 1) is this skill or luck 2) what kind of results can be expected in future (possibly different) market environments.
    The road is littered with people that lost 53%. We just don’t hear about them.

  43. Posted by equally verifiable. | December 12, 2007 at 4:02 PM

    yeah and Jim Cramer has a great track record.

  44. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 4:03 PM

    Sounds like Hell Hath No Fury.

  45. Posted by Yo! | December 12, 2007 at 4:17 PM

    Listen – he may have enviable performance, but he’s still worth ridiculing for his twerpiness, ill-advised facial hair, 38 monitors, Jergen’s lotion, and $250k wasted on a totem pole made of golf bags. Besides, a website with comments praising people’s investment performance wouldn’t be much fun, as the past several posters (Sender?) have proven!
    I’d trade my pay package with this guy anyday, but that’s the only package I’d trade.

  46. Posted by urall jealous | December 12, 2007 at 4:20 PM

    what is your great track record, i’m a dude? its easy to take shots from behind the veil of anonymity. live up to your acronym and be a man- show us what you got to be so proud of that gives you the right criticisize.
    i’ll tell you what the bottle of asprin is for IMHO- its to deal with the crap that uninformed, loser a-holes like you dish out. why dont you go home to your 400 sq ft studio apartment above a dry cleaner’s on 119th street and cry into your pillow on how unfair life is? its a lot easier than coming into work every day at 6:30am and actually putting yourself out there to make it or break it.
    change your screen name to something more appropos like i’m a jerk off.

  47. Posted by urall jealous | December 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM

    what is your great track record, i’m a dude? its easy to take shots from behind the veil of anonymity. live up to your acronym and be a man- show us what you got to be so proud of that gives you the right criticisize.
    i’ll tell you what the bottle of asprin is for IMHO- its to deal with the crap that uninformed, loser a-holes like you dish out. why dont you go home to your 400 sq ft studio apartment above a dry cleaner’s on 119th street and cry into your pillow on how unfair life is? its a lot easier than coming into work every day at 6:30am and actually putting yourself out there to make it or break it.
    change your screen name to something more appropos like i’m a jerk off.

  48. Posted by Ramblin' Wreck | December 12, 2007 at 4:29 PM

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day I’m thankfully NOT a ‘dude’. Besides, who cares if he made 50, 70, or 100% gains…that doesn’t make him immune to douchebaggery.

  49. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 4:30 PM

    I’m a shepherd, dont work in the markets. so I feel I can “criticisize” whatever that may mean.

  50. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 4:34 PM

    lol

  51. Posted by urall jealous | December 12, 2007 at 4:37 PM

    so i’m a dude, you’re a shepherd? does that mean you’re into sheep? figures. its probably the only way you can get any sex.
    you dont work in the markets, but you ping in on these boards? why dont you stop wasting our time and go back to the teenie chat rooms where you can impress children with your skills. Look forward to seeing you when NBC busts your ass on national TV for being a predator.

  52. Posted by L. Craig | December 12, 2007 at 4:49 PM

    I don’t care that he’s 5′4. He already has the Jergens there and that shows me the young man has potential. Wonder if he’d be interested in helping me poll the electorate?

  53. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 4:50 PM

    For what its worth, I only counted like 20 screens. His cell phone and/or Blackberry don’t count do they? What about his Zune? The 2 line LCD on his phone?
    And for the record, I poke fun because I’m jealous.

  54. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 4:50 PM

    yes “Urall” the classic definition of a shepherd is one who herds or tends sheep.
    I’m sorry you feel I’m wasting “your” time by posting here on DB. I’m sure we can have Bess decide who should be allowed to post on her site. If Bess decides shepherds are to be excluded, i will acquiesce.

  55. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 4:53 PM

    yes “Urall” the classic definition of a shepherd is one who herds or tends sheep.
    I’m sorry you feel I’m wasting “your” time by posting here on DB. I’m sure we can have Bess decide who should be allowed to post on her site. If Bess decides shepherds are to be excluded, i will acquiesce.

  56. Posted by Ramblin' Wreck | December 12, 2007 at 4:54 PM

    Where the hell did all the people with such delicate sensibilities (i.e. urall jealous aka Sender or his mom) come from all of the sudden?

  57. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 4:59 PM

    I have no idea what got ms. urall so wound up.
    this a blog run by a straight out of amherst girl, lighten up on ole’ sender. he can fend for himself

  58. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 5:27 PM

    i’m glad everyone has gone home and i was able to get the last word in.

  59. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 5:28 PM

    ‘I’m a dude’ (or should we say ‘I’m a dud’):
    To paraphrase your post above, “…Sounds like Hell Hath No Fury…” like an ‘I’m a dud’ scorned.
    You’re so very angry angry angry, ‘I’m a dud’ – poor baby.
    We have no idea why you have your shepherd’s crook wound up in such a knot – you really should go back with the other sheep on this board that whine “…bahhhhh bahhhh bahhh…” from whence you came.
    As someone posted above, “…The road is littered with people that lost 53%. We just don’t hear about them….” And that’s the only reason we’re hearing from you and othrs like you now – because you’re all just jealous and angry and oh-so-sad. Does it make you feel like a big strong man to act like such a lil’ bitch, hmmmmmmm?

  60. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 5:30 PM

    @5:27 Careful dude. Now you’re gonna be accused of being a janitor or, worse, a back office person.

  61. Posted by jag | December 12, 2007 at 5:35 PM

    urall: I’m surprised you can type with Sender’s balls on your chin.

  62. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 5:37 PM

    you got me i really am a black washroom attendant. i work with david dinkins

  63. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 5:42 PM

    not angry here at all. just like watching you froth at the mouth while defending sender

  64. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 5:43 PM

    @5:37 Knew it. Why else would you be there after 5??? All the big dicked trader boys (the ones typing away on DB all day – that’s how easy it is for them to make money) are already home getting a blow job from one or more of their Eastern European GFs.

  65. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 5:47 PM

    I’m sure everyone knows the connection Sender has to DB. The curator for his art collection is Todd Levin. (light bulbs going off in your head) On DB we have our very own Bess Levin. coincidence?

  66. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 5:55 PM

    look at where sender’s head reaches on his chair with the headrest. he really is a shrimp. he should have posed in low back chair, would not have accentuated his midgetness.

  67. Posted by urall jealous | December 12, 2007 at 6:34 PM

    jag-
    you would know that because you have his cock in your mouth.

  68. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 7:04 PM

    I’m a dud:
    “…not angry here at all….”
    R-i-i-i-g-h-t – that’s why you’re still posting here…
    “…just like watching you froth at the mouth while defending sender…”
    What you really meant to say in your last post was -
    “…look at wheremmmmmmmphhhh reaches onmmmmmmmmphhh the headrest. hemmmmmmph really is ammmmmmph. he shouldmmmmmmph low back chair, wouldmmmmmmph have accentuated hismmmmmmph….”
    It’s hard to talk with Sender’s balls bouncing off of your chin, isn’t it? The only thing frothing in someone’s mouth is Sender’s happy ending in your oral cavity, ‘I’m a dud.’
    Seriously – give it up. But we know that you’re enough of an idiot just like Pavlov’s dogs to not be able to let it go – we know you’ll come drooling back in double quick time to this board to add yet another of your petty, pathetic posts.
    We’re all waiting, I’m a dud….

  69. Posted by I'm a dude | December 12, 2007 at 7:26 PM

    7:04 I cant understand what you’re saying, words are garbled. sounds like you got a dick in your mouth dear.

  70. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 8:48 PM

    God – that was SO EASY, ‘I’m a dud!’
    You really are an idiot, aren’t you?
    When I have a dick in my mouth, that’s called being a heterosexual, because ‘I’m thankfully NOT a dude’ – please note my moniker.
    When YOU have a dick in your mouth, you’re someone’s lil’ bitch fag. And now, you’re a Pavlovian lil’ bitch fag.
    So let’s all play a game – how long will it take “I’m a dud” to come drooling back to this board, yet again, to add yet another of his pathetic posts?
    And the clock starts ——- NOW!

  71. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 9:15 PM

    7:26 I would ignore her. From what I’m seein here, this is one mean nasty bitch that need to get out more and get the cock out of her mouth and into her cunt.

  72. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 12, 2007 at 9:46 PM

    Into my cunt?
    At least I don’t have to take cocks in my ass like you, 09:15, unless I’m in the mood ;)
    I bet you and “I’m a dud” love playing your ‘who’s the pitcher, who’s the catcher tonight’ games with each other….

  73. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 9:47 PM

    uh, no, let’s keep the sausage in her mouth so she can’t talk, then splooge in her hair to really piss her off

  74. Posted by Anonymous | December 12, 2007 at 11:53 PM

    sounds like “NOT a dude” needs a good hard donkey punch

  75. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 12:13 AM

    well i’m sure you’ve been waiting for my response. she really sounds like the lone girl on some trading desk who still gets abused. sounds like she hasnt had anything but plastic in an any orifice of hers for long time. truly sad. she lashes out out us for posting about sender and takes offense to it because she’s been dreaming about him whispering sweet nothings into her ear.

  76. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 13, 2007 at 9:12 AM

    THAR SHE BLOWS – only 3-1/2 hours later, ‘I’m a dud.’ And at 12:13 in the morning? You have nothing better to do at midnight than post on this board? I guess you don’t get up early do you? What, are you really just a hack day trader who sits at home in your pj’s all day?
    As for the more recent posts, the amount of misogynist vitriol is impressive – sad, though. You’re such a group of pathetic, sad, small, little boys – so easily threatened, so little self esteem.
    This Sender guy aside, you truly need to find out what you’re so angry angry angry about. No wonder you’re all pitchers and catchers – by default, no woman would want to be anywhere near you if she saw the kind of hateful things you write anonymously on this board.
    Bell in fifteen – have to go.

  77. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 9:23 AM

    and the response comes a mere 9 hours later. what cant afford a computer at home? or mom and dad dont let you get on after bedtime? I can only assume you are speaking about the school bell.

  78. Posted by Anonymous | December 13, 2007 at 9:31 AM

    I think you two should meet. There’s a chance it would turn into a good thing, in a Carville/Matalin kind of way. You’re obviously both very passionate about your beliefs.

  79. Posted by Anonymous | December 13, 2007 at 9:34 AM

    Plus, “NOT” showed a lot of spunk by admitting to taking it on occasion up the tail pipe (see 9:46), which shows a lot of spunk. Always a good trait in a woman. I’m intrigued.

  80. Posted by urall jealous | December 13, 2007 at 9:54 AM

    “NOT” – dud came back at 12:15 because the evening shift at McDonald’s ends at midnight. guy has to earn a living somehow, since there isnt a lot of job openings for shepherds these days(unless he has a Jesus complex).
    check the school bell reference. he’s definitely on Megan’s list in some state. how many GBs of kiddie porn do you have on your computer, Dud? hope you have a quick format button handy for when the FBI comes crashing thru your front door.
    what a pathetic loser you are. its almost no fun picking on you since you have nothing and are nothing. here’s a song for you to download(if you have any space left on your porn filled drive): I’M A LOSER by the Beatles. maybe you’ve heard it- its like they were singing this about you. Consider it the soundtrack of your life.
    I’m out. have more important things to do than to grind Dud into dust on this board
    (and YES i expecet him to come back with some obvious homosexual reference about me and Sender, blah blah…its boring we’ve all heard it before. no originality.)

  81. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 11:43 AM

    its actually Wendys. McDonalds is an insult.

  82. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 11:49 AM

    Its the Beck song “I’m a loser” that I enjoy listening to. and yes, I’m still in my PJs. wearing fluffy pink slippers too!

  83. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 12:31 PM

    I’m afraid “Not” is still waiting for that bell

  84. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 4:02 PM

    there was the closing bell still no “Not”. guess she all smoke

  85. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 13, 2007 at 10:19 PM

    I’m a dude:
    The only smoke on this thread is that leaking out of your floppy sphincter after last night’s reamfest you participated in with your boyfriend(s). I’ll bet you tossed all their salads as well (if you don’t know what that alludes to, google it, asshat).
    I think from now on, instead of calling you “I’m a dude,” we’ll all call you “I’m a bottom.” After all, if the shoe (or should I say ass?) fits…

  86. Posted by I'm a dude | December 13, 2007 at 11:40 PM

    i have this nagging feeling you’re a guy. you talk the homo trash like a guy does.
    where were you all day?

  87. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 14, 2007 at 9:31 AM

    It’s actually not surprising to anyone here that you can’t tell a girl from a guy.
    More interesting, however, is that you indicate that you know how “… homo trash talk…” should sound. Takes one to know one, I guess.
    How’s that sphincter doin’ now, “I’m a bottom?”
    Opening bell just rang – c u later…

  88. Posted by I'm a dude | December 14, 2007 at 10:40 AM

    i hear or the homo trash on this site. seems that the main topic of conversation here.
    whats with you always announcing the opening bell? you trying to prove you actually know when it is?

  89. Posted by Counting with my fingers | December 14, 2007 at 1:53 PM

    I don’t see 43 screens in that photo.

  90. Posted by Anonymous | December 14, 2007 at 3:14 PM

    SENDER IS A MISERABLE LIL MAN. HE WILL GO BROKE and BURN his CRAP ART TO STAY WARM. FORGET 06, HIS LOSSES HAVE BEEN MUCH WORSE

  91. Posted by morty | December 14, 2007 at 3:55 PM

    The only person who sounds miserable is the poster above. Wow! Bad year (again)? Stinky bonus (again)? Lose your job (again)? Methinks the only ones goin’ broke are the multiple whiners above. You can be sure everybody at Sender’s joint is laughing their asses off at your blogorrhea – all the way to the frickin’ bank!!
    CH-CHING, MO’FO’

  92. Posted by urall jealous | December 14, 2007 at 10:13 PM

    all personal attacks aside, the premise of the initial post is that Sender is some supercilious dope because he spent some money on totem poles made out of golf bags. Has anyone actually taken the time to look this up? well, here is a link:
    http://tlingitculture.com/?cat=4
    Personally, I think that its a very inventive interpretation of the First People’s traditional art form. Notice that the website is Tinglit, and that the article is generally positive. That says to me that these people, whose traditional art form this artist has adapted to a modern form by using western objects, have embraced this and welcomed it. I can say that as compared to some of the other contemporary art out there(e.g. the pickled shark in a tank that sits in the lobby of a famous hedge fund that has 3 letters), its much more approachable and can be appreciated by a broader audience.
    why is this a bad thing to buy if it appeals to you? it is certainly evocative, and it does provoke thoughts about what WOULD our culture use to tell its tale given the same form?( Remember that the totem is the family/tribal history conceptualized and made concrete and exists as an adjunct to the verbal history that is passed down.)
    Personally, i think its very cool. Maybe Bess could enlighten us as to why she was ranting about this in the first place?
    oh, and by the way 3:14PM- if one reads the articles correctly, he wouldnt have to burn his “crap” art to stay warm; he’d sell it to other collectors and be able to afford pretty much about anything he wanted. his art appreciated at a greater rate than the financial markets did if you read the stories in the press. and if there are other people out there that are willing to pay a three to tenfold increase on a piece of crap art, then i would say Sender is one very shrewd guy. i would not hold my breath waiting for him to go bust any time soon…….

  93. Posted by j$ | December 14, 2007 at 10:56 PM

    Sender, you’re a douchebag for going out of your way to maintain face on this ‘tabloid’ website. I seriously doubt you’ve changed anyone’s mind with your link, so get back to what you do best – making cheddah. Who gives a shit what you spend your money on?

  94. Posted by J$ | December 14, 2007 at 11:02 PM

    I, for one, think the Cohen Shark is pretty kick ass.

  95. Posted by les | December 15, 2007 at 9:19 AM

    J$:
    Nah, a douchebag is someone who attacks other people under the cloak of anonymity, without having the balls to put their own name on the line like a man to back up their opinions/assertions.
    Nobody gives a shit about what you say, so why don’t you go back to what you do best – losin’ more money, gettin’ another teeny tiny bonus, and lookin’ for yet another job.

  96. Posted by urall jealous | December 15, 2007 at 3:47 PM

    J$:
    with your post you prove 2 things:
    1. you are culturally insensitive and illiterate. in all likelihood, you have not matured much past fart jokes, which are funny when you are like 12. most people can expand their horizons to appreciate new things, sadly it seems, you cannot.
    2. you are as stupid as you are immature. what makes you think that I or anyone else posting here is Sender?
    and as far as thinking the shark is “kick ass”, that is your opinion and you have a right to it just like someone else has the right to think golf bags made to look like totem poles is “kick ass”.
    btw- do you have flame detailing on your Kia micro sedan? i bet it makes it look like its going REALLY fast! if you save up, you can get a cool ground effects kit and a big rear spoiler. then you will be tricked out just like a race car.

  97. Posted by I'm a dude | December 15, 2007 at 8:20 PM

    Urall, youre such an ass licker. you cant get the smel off youre breath

  98. Posted by urall jealous | December 15, 2007 at 9:52 PM

    and you, “dude”, are a small, envious zero. you aren’t even interesting on a blog like this one. tell you what, dude, why dont you lick your own ass since you seem to be self infatuated.

  99. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 15, 2007 at 10:28 PM

    Hey, look who’s back – It’s ‘I’m a dude’ – or should I say it’s ‘I’m a bottom.’
    I find it interesting, ‘I’m a bottom,’ that YOU should be the one in YOUR post to bring up ass-licking! I mean, if ANYONE on this thread knows about mastication of the anal cavity, it’s GOTTA be you! How apropo!
    Maybe you can convince the next handsome trader you meet to hit you with a “Dirty Mike Wilson!” Have fun!

  100. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 15, 2007 at 10:32 PM

    [...Oh, and by the way 'I'm a bottom,' you can find out what a "Dirty Mike Wilson" is by simply going to http://www.urbandictionary.com and looking it up alpabetically....as if you didn't already know in the first place, you bad, bad, bad little bottom... ;) ]

  101. Posted by I'm a dude | December 15, 2007 at 11:56 PM

    give it up already.

  102. Posted by I'm thankfully NOT a 'dude' | December 16, 2007 at 9:50 AM

    Dear ‘I’m a bottom’:
    “…give it up already…?”
    Is that what your first boyfriend in junior high school said to you when you offered up your virgin asshole for the first time back then?

  103. Posted by I'm a dude | December 16, 2007 at 10:09 AM

    thats actually funnny

  104. Posted by I'm a dude | December 17, 2007 at 2:50 PM

    i guess you’re done Not, sounds like you ran out of witty one liners.

  105. Posted by Anonymous | December 17, 2007 at 2:58 PM

    dude: “Not” has made it very clear that she’s busy trading hours. Bet you’re gonna get a good (and well deserved, given how thick you are) blast from her come 4PM.

  106. Posted by I'm a dude | December 17, 2007 at 3:35 PM

    I cant wait!
    and numbnuts 2:58, she didn’t “make it very clear” that shes busy during trading hours.
    she announced at 9:30 that the bell had rung, trying to get gullible idiots like yourself to think she’s busy during trading hours because she had to go after the bell.

  107. Posted by I'm a dude | December 17, 2007 at 7:50 PM

    looks like there were after school activities

  108. Posted by Anonymous | December 18, 2007 at 8:13 AM

    dude- you are the sound of one hand clapping

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.