Flying Away On A Wing And A Prayer: 125 Basis Points In 8 Days

Well, the 47.5% minority of those polled at DealBreaker got it right. The Fed announced a cut of 50 basis points in the target rate and the discount rate, meaning we've seen 125 basis points slashed off the Fed Funds target rate in the last week or so. As far as we can remember, this has never happened.

There will be some who wonder whether or not the Fed is misreading economic and market conditions. It notes that credit has tightened despite the easing of the commercial paper market, the refinancing jump in mortgages and a lower LIBOR. Still, it's the cut that market wanted. Stocks jumped, bonds and the dollar declined. What was that we were saying about converting the dollar into a gift card with a short expiration date?

One thing that's clear is that the Fed has become a lot less predictable, at least on any long-term basis. Two weeks ago, the chances of a 50 bps cut barely registered in the futures. And since then they've jumped all over the place. So it seems that the market isn't sure what the Fed is going to do week to week. Or perhaps it's the Fed that isn't sure.

The full statement after the jump.


FOMC STATEMENT

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points to 3 percent.

Financial markets remain under considerable stress, and credit has tightened further for some businesses and households. Moreover, recent information indicates a deepening of the housing contraction as well as some softening in labor markets.

The Committee expects inflation to moderate in coming quarters, but it will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.

Today’s policy action, combined with those taken earlier, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity. However, downside risks to growth remain. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and will act in a timely manner as needed to address those risks.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; Sandra Pianalto; Charles I. Plosser; Gary H. Stern; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against was Richard W. Fisher, who preferred no change in the target for the federal funds rate at this meeting.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 50-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 3-1/2 percent. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Bosto

Comments

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 2:56PM

-10 points for the greatest american hero reference

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 2:58PM

Anyone else agree with me that if the majority of people who read a financial blog and probably have a front office job in one way or another, can't accurately predict what the fed will do one day in advance that it's a pretty bad sign? People wonder why there's a credit crunch when the fed can't even manage expectations...

Posted by T Qiu, Jan 30, 2008 3:01PM

Happened 3 times in history: 1974, 1975 and 1980, although interest rates in those days were way higher.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:01PM

Agreed.

Less predictable? Uh no.
They consistently react to the 3 month Treasury rate (as I posted this morning), they're just saving a little ammo.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:05PM

I am not a Registered Nurse.

I am, however, a Nurse Shark.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:08PM

well, DB readers got it wrong but the real futures market as of this morning and mostly all last week had it overwhelmingly right.

i speculate that results on your poll are diluted by ibankers playing armchair rates trader.

Posted by Anonymous, Jan 30, 2008 3:10PM

When Ron Paul is President the FMOC won't be allowed to keep devaluing the dollar.

Posted by Anonomyzer, Jan 30, 2008 3:16PM

@3:10 - Agreed. That is why I am voting for Ron Paul.

Posted by A Proud American, Jan 30, 2008 3:18PM

I own a farm in Iowa. I wish the government stopped messing around with the markets. I find it hard to sell my crops. I love this country and I love freedom. If you love freedom and America as much as I do, you will vote for Ron Paul.

For more information on how you can help save our nation, visit. www.RonPaul2008.com

Posted by Long GC, Jan 30, 2008 3:21PM

Got Gold? Its the Anti Dollar...
Check out the Dollar Chart... Ouch...

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:22PM

I hate freedom. Don't vote for Paul! A vote for Paul is a vote against ZOG!

Posted by Anonymous, Jan 30, 2008 3:23PM

Bah, that's nothing. In 1980/81 the fed would raise or lower the fed funds rate between 150 and 200 points without so much of a thought.

Posted by Ralph, Jan 30, 2008 3:23PM

I like where Bernanke went this cut, maybe the FED should remain unpredictable. Reminds me of late 90's trading...it was the best times in the market and even Nixon would agree. If he was president then his speech would have been a little different. So, for those snotty little brats who wants the FED to show their hand you better go and wipe that snot nose of yours before you make me throw up...this is a big man's game punk. Bernanke rules......

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:23PM

You find it hard to sell your corn at the absurdly high price that is being generated by protectionist sugar policy and the ethanol boondoggle?

Why are all these ron paul nuts from Iowa? I bet ron paul is going to anihiliate the Iowa caucus. oh wait...

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:27PM

fuck yeah ralphie. tell 'em

Posted by Anonymous, Jan 30, 2008 3:28PM

This insanity will stop at 2.50, sometime in the Spring.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:31PM

insanity will not stop until 2

Posted by 1-2, Jan 30, 2008 3:34PM

Time to chime in...a couple of notes:

1) Why do we have a back-room (FOMC) full of self-professed free-market economists who, in the end, are actually utilizing a Keynesian methodology of business cycle management? What kind of cognitive dissonance does one need to work there, and where do i get some?

I believe it's to give the impression of someone being in control--as opposed to someone actually being in control. People are happy with their attribution/impact biases because they allow them to either blame someone else when things go wrong. Studies have shown that people are happy with bad luck as long as someone is to blame, but very miserable when there is bad luck and no one to blame (read Dan Gilbert). This is nothing more than the safety blanket we used as kids (or "God" plays in religion): makes us feel good, but doesn't actually protect us from monsters.

Open to debate though.

2) While the fed has moved nominal rates more in the past, i do not believe they have ever cut 1/3 of the rate in one week. Anyone know differently?

3) While i agree the gov't should step out of markets as much as possible, i dont see how a farmer can be complaining during one of the biggest booms in agriculture we have ever seen. I'm also pretty sure you Iowans would never vote for a guy who actually said he would reduce import tariffs and subsidies. What the heck is an Iowan farmer doing on DB anyways. I call bullshit.

Posted by anon, Jan 30, 2008 3:36PM

WE ARE JAPAN

Posted by BanishStupidity, Jan 30, 2008 3:40PM

@ Ralph and his lap dog, Anonymous 3:27

Clarity around interest rates allow businesses and individuals to plan future investments and decisions, then have the confidence to execute on them. So unless you two pricks trade vol for a living GFO.

Posted by lift all the offers, Jan 30, 2008 3:42PM

The rate is the whiskey, the stimulus tax rebate is the car keys, the American consumer is the teenager, and the US economy is the car.

Posted by anonymous, Jan 30, 2008 3:44PM

The consensus nailed the rate cut - and so did the futures market. The votes reflected not what the Fed was going to do, but what the Fed should do. We didn't put our money or reputation as an 'economist' on the line here. Most of us were hoping for something different than the outcome. That is what was reflected in the poll.

Posted by Rolling Thunder, Jan 30, 2008 3:44PM

B-52 Ben to the rescue... but it appears someone wont survive long enough to be helped by the evac flight.

That was a serious sell program that just went off... OIH getting wacked... WTF is up with that?

Markets look like they will end the day Red...

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:44PM

who is the loose whore in the passenger seat?

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:45PM

Who is Ron Paul?

Posted by 36th Chamber, Jan 30, 2008 3:46PM

re: 1-2

1. Their job is to regulate the free market. Sure they might be self-professed free-market economists, but at the end of the day they're trying to change free market operation (not that this is necessarily a bad thing).

2. Not that I know of, but what the Hell do I know.

3. http://lolpauls.blogspot.com/ I like Ron Paul President of the Internets and farming for babies.

Posted by Pancho Villa, Jan 30, 2008 3:46PM

I'll give you a peso for that dollar.

Posted by s75, Jan 30, 2008 3:48PM

Nobody at the Fed is really a free-market economist. They tend to skew towards practical noninterventionism but I think one and all have a belief and in the role that monetary policy plays in public markets not to mention it is also their job. A pure free-market economist is an economist without a job.

No, to my knowledge it has never happened before.

Yeah, I think Iowa guy was a joke.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:50PM

3:23 - but it was done for the right reasons.
Bernanke > Volcker

Posted by Turkey Hunter, Jan 30, 2008 3:50PM

Richard W Fisher is the only one on that committee who really understands what's going on.

This cancer will not be solved by loose monetary policy - all it does is set an inflation timebomb we will have to deal with in 4-6 months.

Posted by DollarSoreWhore, Jan 30, 2008 3:56PM

@ Pancho Villa

You're DONE on that trade.

Ha ha, suckers....

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 3:57PM

re:1-2

How does a fed rate cut follow a keynesian mindset? unless you are referring to bernakes agreement for the stimulus package..

Posted by TheUnrepentantGunner, Jan 30, 2008 3:57PM

Thunder: OIH and PXJ just snapped back in focus with eachother. In the last 3 minutes eached moved maybe .5% towards eachother. not sure what happened at 3.

Posted by TheUnrepentantGunner, Jan 30, 2008 3:58PM

Thunder: OIH and PXJ just snapped back in focus with eachother. In the last 3 minutes eached moved maybe .5% towards eachother. not sure what happened at 3.

Posted by What market, Jan 30, 2008 3:59PM

Great head fake today. Sucker rally didn't last long. Sell programs are running at full speed. Fasten your seat belts. The fed can't fight this bear.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:03PM

I'm also voting for Ron Paul

Posted by TheUnrepentantGunner, Jan 30, 2008 4:03PM

oops, just realized that wasnt true at all. PXJ fell pretty much in lockstep according to the intra-day charts. Just wasn't watching each holding closely enough throughout the day i guess.

Posted by 1-2, Jan 30, 2008 4:04PM

ok...i had to write this.

The Real Fed Statement

The Federal Open Market Committee decided to chicken out today and lower its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points to 3 percent.

Financial markets remain drunk, and credit has tightened just more than Britney Spears' twat—interestingly this "tight credit" is still looser than the historical average, which is somewhere between the Virgin Mary's and Lindsay Lohan's respective nether-regions. Moreover, recent information indicates a collective BAC of the USA to be just higher than Ted Kennedy's. The Committee also noted there was some substantial softening in the New York Cocaine markets attributed to fewer analysts going "balls out" with "models and bottles".

The Committee expects to ignore any inflation data as it is backwards-looking and looking forward would make us unpopular, possibly even stripping the FOMC of its Jive contract and Teen People cover. Chairman Bernanke commented that his, "mom and pops always told [him] life was a popularity contest…and Big Ben doesn't like losing. Big Ben gets angry when Big Ben loses."

Today’s shots of Everclear combined with those taken earlier this morning, yesterday, and last week, should help to promote risk-seeking behavior, unrealistic economic expectations, and help America recover its status as "Sweetest Dude on Campus". However, waking up with an ugly foreign exchange student from China squeezing our balls is always possible. The Committee will continue to assess the effects of its alcohol dependency, and of those around it (we're looking at you ECB and Japan). Should the committee feel it is not the drunkest guy in the room it will increase its shot intake until more blacked out than Amy Winehouse. The Chairman again commented, "I mean, I went to college. You ever see what happens to the dude who wakes up the drunk guy with writing all over his face? I've seen it. It's not pretty. Usually once the guy realizes there are penises all over his face he begins pummeling whoever is closest. We fully intend to blackout first and get our shoes off before hitting the couch to prevent any unwanted friction."

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Donald L. Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; Sandra Pianalto; Charles I. Plosser; Gary H. Stern; and Kevin M. Warsh. Voting against was Richard W. Fisher, pussy.

In a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a 50-basis-point decrease in the discount rate to 3-1/2 percent. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston—aka blackoutville.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:06PM

from the wsj:
" While the decision was expected, a minority of economists had expected a smaller, quarter point cut. Stocks jumped on the decision, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average swinging from negative to positive territory. Bond prices tumbled and yields shot up."

can anyone explain to this novice why bond prices would move contrary to theory, and go down with the fed cut?

Posted by NSD, Jan 30, 2008 4:09PM

1-2 , an early bid for comment of the year.

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:10PM

STHU those who talk about ron paul

Posted by NSD, Jan 30, 2008 4:11PM

Its not my field, but a guess would be to sell bonds to buy the rally, thus driving yield down.

Posted by Anal_yst, Jan 30, 2008 4:11PM

@1-2

you have way too much time on your hands, and I am jealous

@ gunner, etc

looks like program trades going off wiping out the easy-money gains right after the fed decision. Low hanging fruit baby...

Posted by 1-2, Jan 30, 2008 4:12PM

Easy to have time on your hands when you're checking out of your firm in a month...

Posted by NSD, Jan 30, 2008 4:12PM

- i meant drive yield up

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:22PM

@ Anonymous 4:06

That statement is too vague and misleading to deduce anything from it - chalk it up to another asinine reporter.

At the time of the announcement, initially the curve steepened, lead by the back end (10yr+ maturity) which indicates inflationary concerns from investors and generally the increasing cost of risk out the curve. The front end, as you would expect, is the most sensitive to Fed cuts and held relatively stable - keep in mind the 2yr was already aggressively priced (low yielding) and requires consistent and progressively worse data (did not get that this week) to justify being so far ahead of the fed so that initial reaction is not surprising at all.

All of this is not incongruent w/ market theory in the least sense.

Posted by girl, Jan 30, 2008 4:23PM

I second NSD

Posted by RJD, Jan 30, 2008 4:28PM

Ron Paul 2008..

Posted by Rolling Thunder, Jan 30, 2008 4:34PM

@ Gunner,

Its my own fault, I have been holding a ton of calls on the OIH and never tapped. It a black hole in the daily results. I cant help but watch it... flocken thing moves the port around.

Prob about time to pick up some more... lol

RT

Posted by Ron Paul, Jan 30, 2008 4:38PM

.

Posted by Boobman, Jan 30, 2008 4:40PM


(*) (*)

Posted by Boobman, Jan 30, 2008 4:42PM


(*) (*)

Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:55PM

@boobman - nice!

Posted by Fed up with the RP BS, Jan 31, 2008 12:02AM

To all you die-hard Ron Paul boosters: what the hell do you think is going to happen on February 5? That Ron Paul is going to rise from the political graveyard and reap an overwhelming number of delegates? If it doesn't work out your way on Super Tuesday, are you going to finally shut up?

Posted by averros, Jan 31, 2008 2:19AM

Oh, yes, we should shut up and let the Bernanke and the gang of Oballary socialists to drag this country into default.

Hint - it won't be pleasant for YOU. Please inquire how much shit regular people were going through during defaults in Russia and Asia. Fancy waiting for hours in bread line? You will.

That's why those of us who actually have a clue -- and memory long enough to remember that the good times can turn into a nightmare overnight -- will fight the gang as long and as much as we can.

Right now it means speaking (and voting) for Ron Paul. Call it informed self-interest.

Posted by Fed up with the RP BS, Jan 31, 2008 7:42AM

Averros:

I'll take my chances on the bread line.

Just curious -- what does your memory stretch back to? The bread lines in the 90s? 80s? 70s? 60s? 50s? Hint -- there were no bread lines in the U.S. during any of those times.

Just exactly what good times in the U.S. have turned into a nightmare overnight? Are you talking about the 20s and the Great Depression? Those times ended over 65 years ago! I'm sure the times were scary for those who lived through them, but I doubt you did. It's an understatement to say much in the economic world has changed since then.

Just curious: what "gang" are you fighting against?

You didn't answer my original question. If it doesn't work out your way on Super Tuesday, are you going to put your energies into something more constructive, that has a chance of success? Or is Ron Paul going to build a big funeral pyre in Texas and ask all the true believers to climb in? Just wondering if you have any post-primary plans, because you should.

Post Your Comment