What a wild ride we’ve had with Countrywide today. Shares of the home lending behemoth dropped following reports this morning from the Los Angeles Times that the company was on the verge of bankruptcy. And they shot back up this afternoon as word leaked that Bank of America is in talks to buy Countrywide. (Careful DealBreaker readers read it here first, and now the Wall Street Journal is reporting it.)
Even earlier today, CNBC’s Charlie Gasparino—shirt sleeves deceptively intact—was reporting on the “governing philosophy” that created the mortgage mania which in turn birthed our mortgage meltdown and, at the very least, exacerbated the broader credit crunch. He had discovered that back in 2003 Countrywide Angelo Mozilo had given an speech to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies and the National Housing Endowment calling for loosened credit ratings standards and a reduction, or perhaps an end, to downpayment requirements for homebuyers. This was the speech, of course, that informed the front page National Mortgage News story we unearthed for you last Friday.
But don’t blame Mozilo. He was only responding rationally to the incentives created by that all to compassionate monster, the state. Long before the Bush administration attempted to rebuild Iraqi society, it set out to rebuild American society. Although it went under the banner of “compassionate conservativism,” the Bush adminsitration’s call for an “Ownership Society” was, at its core, central economic planning on a colossal scale. The market had failed to make enough Americans homeowners, and so the Bush administration set out to “expand homeownership.”
More after the jump.
Of course, accumulating funds for a down payment is one of the biggest barrier to homeownership. The Bush administration addressed this with both legislation and arm-twisting. It signed into law the American Dream Downpayment Fund, allegedly aimed at helping low-income families own homes by subsidizing their downpayments. It issued challenges to lenders to “close the homeownership gap” by loosening lending standards. It celebrated lenders who did this.
A “Fact Sheet” that was once but apparently no longer is available on the website of the Whitehouse tells the tale nicely. “President Bush Calls for Expanding Opportunities to Homeownership” the headline reads. It goes on to inform the populace that the “President's aggressive housing agenda will help dismantle the barriers to homeownership by providing down payment assistance, increasing the supply of affordable homes, increasing support for self-help homeownership programs, and simplifying the home buying process & increasing education.”
That “Fact Sheet” was issued in connection with a speech the President gave in Atlanta, Georgia calling for “Expanding Opportunities To Homeownership.” The speech is full of the usual blather we’ve come to expect from our presidents. Education is wonderful. Immigration is wonderful. But the now peculiar focus on expanding homeownership stands out. As Bush explains it, tearing down barriers of downpayments and documentation are part of being a good, loyal American. Perhaps even a good Christian. A part of the War on Terror.
I believe out of the evil done to America will come incredible good. I believe that as sure as I'm standing here. I believe we can achieve peace. I believe that we can address hopelessness and despair where hopelessness and despair exist. And listen, I understand that in this great country, there are too many people who say, this American Dream, what does that mean; my eyes are shut to the American Dream, I don't see the dream. And we'd better make sure, for the good of the country, that the dream is vibrant and alive.It starts with having great education systems for every single child. (Applause.) It means that we unleash the faith-based programs to help change people's hearts, which will help change their lives. (Applause.) It means we use the mighty muscle of the federal government in combination with state and local governments to encourage owning your own home. That's what that means. And it means -- it means that each of us, each of us, have a responsibility in the great country to put something greater than ourselves -- to promote something greater than ourselves.
And to me, that something greater than yourself is to love a neighbor like you'd like to be loved yourself. In order to change America and to make sure the great American Dream shines in every community, every community, we must unleash the compassion and kindness of the greatest nation on the face of the earth.
If you don’t lend, borrow and “buy,” the terrorists, the evil-doers and perhaps the Evil Doer himself wins.
“We certainly don't want there to be a fine print preventing people from owning their home,” the President says. “We can change the print, and we've got to.”
And so the “fine print” was changed. The rest of the story is well known. Angelo Mozilo and others like him responded to the subsidies, entreaties and incentives by opening the mortgage floodgates. Wall Street responded to the flood of mortgages by carrying it away in asset-backed securities buckets. Investors responded by carrying those buckets. And now we’re finding that we’re all wet.
In short, we checked into the Ownership Society years ago. The question now is whether we can ever leave.
Remarks by the President on Homeownership [Whitehouse.gov]






Posted by jag , Jan 10, 2008 4:29PM
Nothing that the government did excuses the actions of the banks and brokerages, or the idiocy of investors and ratings firms.
Blame the market for being populated by idiots.
Posted by series7.5 , Jan 10, 2008 4:31PM
oh yeah, finger on the pulse
sorry i would have sent to tips@db but the firm is already probably about to block you i suspect, i dont want to aggravate them further
Posted by rightchurchwrongpew , Jan 10, 2008 4:33PM
Wrong again Carney. Ayn Rand, Objectivism and Greenspan are to blame. As much as I would like to pin this on Bush it was Alan who created these bubbles with "laisez faire" attitude toward regulation and short term IR policy.
Posted by rightchurchwrongpew , Jan 10, 2008 4:35PM
Wrong again Carney. Ayn Rand, Objectivism and Greenspan are to blame. As much as I would like to pin this on Bush it was Alan who created these bubbles with "laisez faire" attitude toward regulation and short term IR policy.
Posted by Mission Accomplished? , Jan 10, 2008 4:41PM
Funny that it took the FHLB Act 50+ years to implode.
The Bush/Greenspan plan imploded in less than 10, and was much more expensive.
Posted by You are right , Jan 10, 2008 4:44PM
Ya know Carney and Levin you have some damn smart and knowledgeable people on this site sporatically. The above info is more accurate than not. Thanks
Posted by s75 , Jan 10, 2008 4:46PM
ps i blame roosevelt, the new deal, and the 1938 congress for chartering fannie mae to begin with
Posted by , Jan 10, 2008 4:50PM
i shudder to think what the last half decade in america would have been like without the consumer spending and a healthy housing market before it went nuclear.
i would actually argue the plan was sound at first but then it got out of hand. agree with jag, call me an apologist if you want, but stupidity and greed hijacked a concept that had a lot of promise
Posted by NotNasser , Jan 10, 2008 4:58PM
"But don’t blame Mozilo. He was only responding rationally to the incentives created by that all to compassionate monster, the state."
Who should we blame for the radioactive glow of his skin, though?
Posted by Haywood Jablowme , Jan 10, 2008 5:29PM
It's a classic case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the lenders.
If the banks keep their underwriting standards strict and don't lend to the poor (or more generally, people who can't afford something), they are castigated and investigated for "racist or exclusionary lending practices".
And when they are encouraged to lend to people who clearly can't afford what they are buying and structure the note so they make a profit (ie, higher interest rates) and then suddenly (shockingly!) these people can't make payments and face losing their homes in a downturn? Well then the banks are "practicing predatory lending practices and taking advantage of the poor".
I've got a message for you, guy making $50k who wants to buy that $600k house in Rye with no money down and 2 year I/O ARM - you can't f-ing afford it.
And why should I, the taxpayer, have to pay for your greed?
Posted by anon4life , Jan 10, 2008 5:42PM
Is this post for real? From what I understand, the Clinton administration first took the initiative in the mid-1990s to spur the creation of sub-prime mortgages. If anything, the Bush administration was merely carrying the same tune - but the idea that Bush, from out of nowhere, encouraged the less fortunate to seek homeownership is a fantasy.
Again, if this post is for real (not tongue in cheek), you guys have lost a great deal of credibility. Check your facts.
Posted by anon anon anon , Jan 10, 2008 5:43PM
BofA was dumb now its dumb and dumber. If they had all the fun they can take with investment banking, nothing like playing with and feeding a shark(countrywide) in your swimming pool while you float around.
Posted by , Jan 10, 2008 5:47PM
This is FHLB Implosion Redux.
Have you seen the amount of FHLB advances to CFC?
Posted by rightchurchwrongpew is right , Jan 10, 2008 6:24PM
Once again, fiscal policy wins out over monetary policy. Greenspan, the "expert" who makes the world tour today as a hero, is the one who is accountable a lot for this mess. Why? He's the one who encouraged these very toxic ARMs back in the day while raising interest rates 14 times or so.
Check out the interview with Mark Faber (Doom, Gloom, Boom report) who said he used to work with Greenspan, and he has harsh words for the man as forecaster and policymaker. We pay for this mess...
Posted by Joe , Jan 10, 2008 6:29PM
It all started when they passed the law saying a married couple could keep $500k in housing gains tax free every two years - turned everybody's house into a Roth IRA - of course there's going to be a bubble!!!!
Posted by . , Jan 10, 2008 6:55PM
B of A just bought it
Posted by . , Jan 10, 2008 7:08PM
just kidding
Posted by 56 , Jan 10, 2008 8:03PM
JC, 5:42 has a point. The Cuckold AG, Andy Cuomo has already owned his part in this mess.
Posted by 56 , Jan 10, 2008 8:04PM
JC, 5:42 has a point. The Cuckold AG, Andy Cuomo has already owned his part in this mess.
Posted by Vandalay Industries , Jan 10, 2008 10:31PM
Umm... So all the guys that graduated in the top of their class at Wharton, MIT, HBS, Stanford, etc. are too dumb to realize that their lending had risks, that the ratings were shady, that the housing market was in a bubble, etc.
Posted by Vandalay Industries , Jan 10, 2008 10:37PM
Umm... So all the guys that graduated in the top of their class at Wharton, MIT, HBS, Stanford, etc. are too dumb to realize that their lending had risks, that the ratings were shady, that the housing market was in a bubble, etc.
Posted by Finn , Jan 11, 2008 1:26AM
This is ridiculous. So Bush is Putin now, with industry mindlessly bending to his will?
Nonsense. More like Bush pushed an initiative, and business and home buyers had lust in their hearts and went at it.
In essence, it's like your dad saying, "Son, I want you to get a woman who makes you happy", and you run out and get the filthiest (yet attractive) anal loving hooker you can find.
"Well Pops told me to," you say later, with whore cooties renovating your genital molecular structure and causing you pain.
Posted by very smart , Jan 11, 2008 7:41AM
itchy dixit?
Posted by Geico Caveman , Jan 11, 2008 8:38AM
"Fuh.......what?"
Posted by Dallax Rymko , Jan 11, 2008 8:51AM
Here is fact sheet (thx to google cache):
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WUpx2-Fq9YsJ:www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020617.html+President+Bush+Calls+for+Expanding+Opportunities+to+Homeownership+.pdf&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
Posted by Bugs Meany , Jan 11, 2008 8:55AM
Finn, good analogy.
Posted by , Jan 11, 2008 9:14AM
@5:45 sounds like the college Republicans I used to come across
Posted by , Jan 11, 2008 10:31AM
I think he's right. The market is going to find profit and that us exactly what its supposed to do, we shouldn't hold it to some imaginary moral standard. That is what he have government for; to save us from ourselves. By "us" I mean the idiot population of the market, not the bitter IBers that comment here. Policy makers damn well better ponder the implicatiobs of how the market will move in to the new territory created by said policy. To expect anything else is a joke.
Posted by BeenThereDoneThan , Jan 11, 2008 4:36PM
I hate to tell you but this happens about every 20 to 25 years in the banking industry.
Bankers loosen their underwriting standards, mortgage brokers get greedier, the borrowers get dumber and those buying Mortgage Backed Securities aren't thinking straight.
I am not surprised it happened and it will happen again. Those who do not know historys mistakes are doomed to repeat them.