Looking For Risk In All The Wrong Places

In the demonological pantheon of the subprime crisis orthodoxy, the deepest level of hell are reserved for unscrupulous lenders. Uncreditworthy borrowers live at a slightly higher plane, nearby unvigiliant regulators. But the cant and caterwauling of the orthodox overlooks that much of the world was focused on quite different concerns before the mortgage bills for the ownership society came due.

Despite our best efforts, we’re still cursed with a memory that reaches past this morning’s headlines. We cannot forget that the problem with the CDO market was supposed to be insider trading instead of the weakness of the underlying financial assets. And it was meant to be hedge funds that posed a systemic risk to the financial system rather than our venerable investment banks, money centers, trading houses and brokerages. The great accounting scandal was backdated stock options rather than marked-to-model financial products. In short, all the heat and light generated by our various guardians was aimed in the wrong direction.

Yet so strongly held was the belief in the old orthodoxy that, if you listen closely or read the New York Times business section on Sunday, you can still hear those who wonder whether or not insider trading or hedge fund manipulation is somehow behind our current troubles. There is not much evidence of this, as SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins pointed out recently.

“Although we and our counterparts in government are monitoring and looking into the origins of the events of the last year, it does not seem that hedge funds were the origin of the subprime problems,” Atkins said. If anything, some hedge funds and their investors seem to have been the first casualties of the current debacle rather than the causes.

We don’t mean this as a criticism of those guardians. Rather, it seems to us an indication that the actual risks in our innovative financial world are difficult to detect and that none of our journalistic and political institutions are particularly well-adapted to early detection. What we need is modesty in forward looking, crisis-avoiding regulations—often we may be aiming our resources where they are not needed, and diverting our attention from where they are. As the fellows at Goldman used to say, since we can’t tell where things are going, we’d best stay nimble. There’s a very good chance that once again the orthodoxy is hunting down imaginary demons.

Comments

Posted by , Jan 29, 2008 12:33PM

big words

Posted by , Jan 29, 2008 1:00PM

It would serve us well to look for risk wherever Ben Stein thinks it will be.

Posted by The Man from Waseca, Jan 29, 2008 1:08PM

We all know the financial engineers at the big investment banks feasted on their shennanigans. And since these investment banks were so much part of the commercial banks, and brokerages, this was no accident. An ex-Fed chairman (not AG) predicted this will happen. His prediction is more than 20 years old.

Posted by chris, Jan 29, 2008 1:26PM

Boy, your writing really sucks ass.

Posted by Ranking Banking, Jan 29, 2008 1:37PM

Really, Chris, you're an ass. You wouldn't know good writing if it came up at punched you in your nose.

Posted by , Jan 29, 2008 1:38PM

carney this was painful

Posted by chris, Jan 29, 2008 1:46PM

Ranking - You really think this is good writing? He's trying way too hard to be Equity Private.

Posted by Bess Fan No. 1, Jan 29, 2008 2:05PM

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by Anal_yst, Jan 29, 2008 3:24PM

Someone busted out the Thesaurus today, eh Carney?

Interesting piece though, glad you're churnin em out today

Posted by Novice, Jan 30, 2008 12:30PM

Good point, Carney, but reporters don't apologize; it doesn't sell papers. Besides, it's difficult to imagine Crab Hands as someone whom financial column calumny has harmed.

Post Your Comment