Talk of recession is everywhere. The Fed is cutting like a barber above a pie shop. Consumer confidence is sinking, spending failing to keep up with spending power. You can’t read a Fed statement without coming across worries about the credit crunch. You’d think that we might see an increase in defaults for leveraged loans that fueled the buyout wave that crested last year.
But you’d be wrong. The leverage loan default rate is at the lowest rate in years. We ended 2007 at a 10-year low of 0.1 percent for Moody's-rated issuers, down from 0.6 percent in 2006.
So what’s going on? Are companies saddled with debt are simply especially healthy right now? Not very likely. What’s holding down the default rate is that it’s so hard for a company to breach a covenant these days these days, according to Reuters Jonathan Keehner and Megan Davis. In fact, it may be hard even to find a covenant that can be breached short of total collapse.
“The problem is that the most recent round of dealmaking partly removed a canary in the coal mine traditionally used by lenders to signal when a deal was in trouble,” he writes.
Lending agreements from the buyout boom had such loose conditions that some were dubbed "covenant lite" because they lacked traditional default triggers called maintenance covenants. Those covenants track a borrower's ability to meet financial obligations.Historically, a company that issued leveraged loans would break a maintenance covenant if it ran into liquidity trouble, said Kenneth Emery, who directs Moody's corporate default research. Lenders would then be alerted to the situation early and could take corrective action, like selling assets, changing management or pushing the company into bankruptcy, according to Emery.
But without such strict covenants, the default rate could react less to liquidity issues at newly private companies -- which may be at higher risk in a recession due to the debt load that often accompanies a buyout.
So companies can run into trouble and keep running without tripping covenants, and lenders may not be able to get them to the table until a lot of value has been destroyed. In short, the lower default rate may also lead to a lower recovery rate for lenders.
LBO companies' health could be worse than it looks [Reuters]






Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:28PM
Agree with that. Everyone and their brother since 2006.
Also - recession predictions are forward looking, as in "everything is bad right now and getting worse". So even the most vulnerable companies wouldn't start running out of steam til about now...so you would start to see tendons popping around Q1:08 at earliest and cascade down from there. Bond insurance is about to get real fun.
Also, most of the craziest packages have PIK provisions, and Libor + denominations, so BB driving down the prime rate is effectively buying addt'l breathing room.
Posted by 1-2 , Jan 30, 2008 4:32PM
LBO paper is a small fraction LBO paper is a small fraction <1% of outstanding junk bonds. The cov lite thing was rediculous, but i disagree that THEY are the canaries in the goldmine. SMiD cap firms are the true canaries.
Posted by 1-2 , Jan 30, 2008 4:33PM
LBO paper is a small fraction LBO paper is a small fraction <1% of outstanding junk bonds. The cov lite thing was rediculous, but i disagree that THEY are the canaries in the goldmine. SMiD cap firms are the true canaries.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:34PM
LBO paper is a small fraction of the market (ie, less than 1% of outstanding junk bonds). The cov lite thing was rediculous, but i disagree that THEY are the canaries in the goldmine. SMiD cap firms are the true canaries.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:38PM
Lev. loans don't pertain just to LBO paper and they are actually now a larger part of the junk universe than bonds.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:44PM
Yup, LBO's are small fraction and the current cash to debt ratios exceeds all of the quarterly values of the 1990s by at least 5%. Defaults are expected to go up but still way below historic averages. I think due to Enron/MCI, etc, companies have become fairly conservative and have more cash than ever and would be in a better shape to withstand credit shocks than in 2000. (this does not apply to financials)
Posted by Eliminate All Lawyers , Jan 30, 2008 4:46PM
It has to do with liquidity. That default rate will continue to rise, don't worry. Covenants have very very little to do with it. January defaults have taken the rate from 0.26% in December to 0.75% or so in January.
Leveraged Loans are a similar sized market to bonds...though they are not a market, because they are not actually securities.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:50PM
And by not being a registered security all the I-banks basically just lie to the buying base on any amendment/waiver.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 4:55PM
oops
"Everyone and their brother since 2006."
Everyone and their brother has refinanced since 2006
Agree with 4:34.
Posted by anon , Jan 30, 2008 5:36PM
New York, Jan. 29 (LCD) – The ratio of debt trading at distressed levels increased this month by the fastest rate in five years, according to a report by Standard & Poor’s.
The U.S. distressed ratio increased to 11.1% in January, from 6.1% last month, the fastest increase since October 2002, said the report, entitled “U.S. Distressed Debt Monitor: Fastest Monthly Gain in Five Years,” published on Jan. 25.
The level, at 11.1%, was the highest since September 2003. Distressed credits are speculative-grade rated issues with option-adjusted spreads more than 1,000 bps over Treasuries, according to S&P.
Posted by , Jan 30, 2008 5:42PM
Yes, there is a historical correlation between debt trading at distressed levels and defaults. Given current market conditions, though, the last post was completely meaningless. There are many names trading at depressed levels that have solid credit profiles.
Posted by 5:36 , Jan 30, 2008 5:56PM
5:42 - going to have to respectfully disagree with you there. I think the market is in some respects forward looking, and we are not just experiencing a liquidity event here. And also take into consideration the forward refinance calendar, which may result in some credits being unable to roll their debt.
Posted by Vulture , Jan 30, 2008 8:13PM
5:42
"There are many names trading at depressed levels that have solid credit profiles"
What exactly are you smoking son?
I've been investing in distressed securities for 20 years. Its not even close to a buyers market yet.
Posted by exmonoline guy , Jan 30, 2008 9:17PM
Just wait til these CLOs start blowing up in late 2008. That's when the fun really begins! Wait til we hear all about corp defaults and banks/everyone and their mother writing down pieces of CLOs.
Posted by a-man , Jan 30, 2008 11:10PM
Way to cover the credit crunch six months after it hits. This "vintage" of credit is the worst in the history of modern capitalism so anything short of a payment default is just plain old bupkiss.
Posted by Carter Pewterschmidt , Jan 31, 2008 10:50AM
A lot of companies saw this coming and saved up cash.
That being said, PIKs will be toggled this year.