For close to three years the Big Four accounting firms have been advising their corporate clients to change the way they account for auction-rate securities. Many companies changed the way they account for auction-rate securities on their balance sheets, sometimes classifying them as current assets and short-term investments. But some, like Continental, continued to included at least some portion of their auction-rate securities in the “cash equivalent” line.
Early last year the Financial Standards and Accounting Board decided that the “cash equivalent” designation was too open to confusion and abuse and recommended it be eliminated from cash flow statements. Many corporate treasurers and investment banking professionals who spoke to DealBreaker believe that this helped trigger the sell-off of auction-rate securities at the end of last year and the beginning of this year.
Others point to an even more recent accounting phenomenon—an advisory issued in January by Deloitte that warned auditors that “many issuances of auction rate securities have been adversely affected by the turmoil in the credit markets; thus, their current fair value is at a discount, sometimes substantial, from par value.” As auditors began to inform client corporations that they were going to have to record impairments of their auction-rate securities, corporate treasurers decided to unload this new source of credit market damage to balance sheets. Even corporations that had changed the accounting treatment of the auction-rated securities much earlier had not really paid much mind to them.
Deloitte told auditors that “because many entities assumed that these securities were economically equivalent to cash (even if they are not the accounting equivalent of cash), investments may not be on the “radar screen” as companies consider their loss exposures in the current environment.”
Once companies began to appreciate the potential for significant declines in value, they began to jettison their auction-rate securities. Suddenly, demand for these securities vanished from the marketplace, however, and companies seeking to unload them found themselves burdened with suddenly illiquid investments they once considered cash.
Auction Rate Securities Warrant Scrutiny for Impairment [Deliotte]






Posted by guest , Feb 22, 2008 1:32PM
Something about your redesign has made it impossible to read your website from my office. All the articles now fail on my browser.
Posted by guest , Feb 22, 2008 4:14PM
So the banks were not propping up this market?
Posted by guest , Feb 22, 2008 4:18PM
No air time for the BAC for UBS rumor?
Posted by guest , Feb 22, 2008 7:50PM
Wow, this whole thread is hilarious... PS: the March '07 decision by the FASB to eliminate cash equivalents was part of the financial statement presentation project. That project won't be done for another 2-3 years assuming an aggressive time frame. It has no effect on current balance sheet classifications or headings. I really doubt it had any effect on the ARS market. The Deloitte advisory, on the other hand, definitely did. Also, the SEC weighed in on the ARS issue back in november 2006, saying they didn't meet the def. of cash equivalents. See the "current accounting and disclosure issues" under the corporation finance homepage. So from that point on, it wasn't just the Big Four beating up on ARS, it was effectively GAAP, given the SEC's authority.