We deserve some sort of prize for holding out a full five days to post about the nude pictures of Lindsay Lohan in New York Magazine. New York got some twenty million page views in the first two days, according to Jeff Bercovici. So much traffic that it crashed the website.
New York Magazine was started by writers and other disreputable literary types but soon fell into the hands of Rupert Murdoch thanks to a hostile takeover. When it happened, some were scandalized. Now it looks like a practice run for Murdoch’s takeover of the Wall Street Journal. Murdoch sold the magazine in 1990 to to K-III Communications, a partnership controlled by KKR’s Henry Kravis. The magazine did well for several years but Kravis was not exactly a hands-off owner. He reportedly fired an editor over the magazine's coverage of his friends and Wall Street associates.
In 2003, New York was sold to Bruce Wasserstein, the Cravath attorney turned investment banker turned private equity baron. Wasserstein installed the best magazine editor alive, Adam Moss, to head the magazine. And that guy got Lindsay Lohan to pose naked for all of us, once again confirming his place at the top of the magazine editor heap. In short, we all have private equity to thank for bringing us this historic triumph.
Even better, there is an important tax lesson to be learned from all this. At least, that’s what we’re told by the folks at MainStreet.com, the money blog version of Parade magazine. How exactly are Lindsay’s assets taxable? We’re not quite sure we want to answer that question this early in the afternoon. But here’s how MainStreet.com gets there:
Unlike Hollywood starlets, most people are not stripping for the public, but there is a good chance that their financial records could undergo a shocking undressing. (Yes, we know it’s stretch, but go with it, dearest readers.) According to Surviving an IRS Tax Audit, nearly 50% of all taxpayers will be audited during their lifetime. While the initial notice in the mail can be cause for concern, an audit from the IRS doesn’t mean the worst as long as people know what to expect and are prepared.
At least they admit it's a stretch. A-plus for effort, kids.
After the jump we bring private equity and Lindsay Lohan together in a much more intimate way. It's NSFW, which is internet-speak for "totally awesome."
Editor's Note: That picture represents Lindsay on Portfolio, which seemed appropriate since Portfolio's media writer was expounding on Lindsay. That's our story and we're sticking to it.
Lindsay Lohan Nude [New York]
Naked Lindsay a Web Home Run for 'New York' [Media Matters, Portfolio.com]
Naked Lohan Makes Us Think of Taxes [MainStreet.com]






Posted by diablo , Feb 22, 2008 4:26PM
http://dealbreaker.com/2008/02/how_private_equity_got_lindsay.php#post-comment
No comments? Perhaps because the Home page doesn't show this story?
Try link above.
Now back to NY Mag.
Posted by BSD , Feb 22, 2008 5:11PM
John, you have just made up for every single unfunny-but-desperately-trying-to-be post you have ever written. This. Is. Gold. I might go out and buy a seventh monitor, just to have that picture as permanent wallpaper.
Posted by John Carney , Feb 22, 2008 6:00PM
The problem is now fixed. Sorry for the low and slow volume. Servers took a snow day. They are now back up. Thanks for your patience. We'll be back come Monday.
Posted by Anal_yst , Feb 22, 2008 7:57PM
Lohan doesn't look great, but much better than the emaciated bergen-belsen look she had going on during her escapades with the Olsen Twin Diet (TM), ("An 8ball a day keeps the fat away!")
Though, she isn't a great actress by any stretch of the imagination, she's not stunning, and seems to be popular only because of the human circus which is Lindsey Lohan.
Hmm, no real discernable talent, nothing much to look at, human circus, ignores all criticism, hmmmm who does that remind me of....
Posted by guest , Feb 22, 2008 8:27PM
Shut up douche. I'd gladly do her 100 times a day for the rest of my life.
Posted by guest , Feb 23, 2008 8:45PM
Which would be very short.
Carney posted this? Jeez, maybe he has learned something from Bess.
And for the first time since at least pre-Rupert, a lot of people are talking about New York magazine. But no one is noting how Lohan's body appears to have changed since the VF photos that were only, what, two rehabs ago??
Posted by guest , Feb 24, 2008 12:14AM
what happened to bess's mccain post? only thing worth reading friday.
Posted by guest , Feb 24, 2008 8:59PM
ah, no comment on the small nipples yet? honestly? i think she looks great but the small, pale nipples just don't do it for me. give me some brown silver dollars on cans that size
Posted by guest , Feb 25, 2008 8:23AM
am i to understand you will NOT be reposting the pictures from nymag site that is blocked by my corporate mother?
Posted by guest , May 23, 2008 1:02PM
Thanks for linking our article, John! Hope you enjoyed it.
Best,
Amanda Beals/MainStreet.com