MBIA: Of Course Those Insurance Experts Couldn’t Get Mortgage Bonds Totally Wrong Again!

The more we think about the tremendous bounce in MBIA’s share price yesterday the less we like it. It bothered us so much yesterday that we spent plenty of time going back through the slides and our notes from the endless conference call trying to decide what could possibly have persuaded the markets that Warburg Pincus and MBIA were right about this while Pershing Capital and Meredith Whitney were totally wrong. It was like unspooling at roll of endless tape. We were tempted to buy into Felix Salmon’s thesis that MBIA executives had bored investors into being persuaded.

In the end, we concluded that it’s just the same old error of “well, at least we now know how bad it is” that emerges every time financial company announces credit market derived losses. We’re now on round three or four of this process, and every time it happens we hear a chorus of voices telling us that the latest announcement discloses losses that are so deep that they must represent the entirety. In fact, we’re starting to wonder if careful traders, especially options traders, haven’t started to rely on this effect for their trading—buy before the disclosure, wait for post announcement run-up, then sell.

We hate to second guess markets. It’s arrogant and even solipsistic. Just because we think something matters doesn’t mean the market will eventually come around to our way of thinking. We’re sure it’s just some kind of analytic blindness that has made us distrustful of MBIA’s internal risk assumptions. They were wrong before! Could they really be wrong twice in a row! They control acceleration—and seem totally willing to control it all the way out of the business of insurance by refusing to accelerate when it is obviously called for. But somehow that won’t drive away customers! They live in a land where they hung the jerk who invented work and paddle canoes on lakes of stew and whiskey too.

They blamed “unjustified fearmongering” and “distortions” for their stock's decline. (Don't ask about what the specific distortions were, please.) No-one has ever done that before. They are wisdom in action!

Comments

1

Posted by NotNasser , Feb 01, 2008 11:21AM

Looks like the city of Springfield, Mass. got away with something.

See p. C2 of today's WSJ. Then please tell me: if the highly-speculative CDO investment/gamble had paid off, as with better timing it might have, would Springfield have given back its winnings to Merrill?

2

Posted by Anal_yst , Feb 01, 2008 11:43AM

re: 3rd paragraph

Carney, are you wasted already/still from last night?

don't fret, you're not the only one bro

3

Posted by , Feb 01, 2008 12:18PM

MBI is a joke. That is all.

4

Posted by Anominous , Feb 01, 2008 12:27PM

that call and yesterday's move up in MBIA stank to high heaven. MBIA's response to Ackman's data was "do you believe us or your lying eyes?" and everybody went with MBIA. no unscreened ?s on the call. was grape Kool-Aid served?

my suspicion, without any informed knowledge about what is actually going on, is that the "global bank" that helped Ackman prepare his model is short the monolines + financials + structured product (Goldman?). Everyone else is effectively long and trying to prop up the monolines by any means necessary.

5

Posted by anon anon anon , Feb 01, 2008 12:27PM

This is an easy call. The muni bond insurers left their patch and insured scoundrel subprime bonds without getting a high enough premium. Anyway, you can never get a high enough premium from a scoundrel because he cheats.
So add this to the credit crunch and you may have one of those events.

6

Posted by Ramblin' Wreck , Feb 01, 2008 12:49PM

Mmmm...lakes of stew...lakes of whiskey...

Pray tell, doth thou speaketh of Heaven?

7

Posted by 700+SATVerbal , Feb 01, 2008 1:46PM

wtf? anybody else have to look up solipsistic??? thanks for making me feel stupid DB...mission accomplished!

8

Posted by Solipsist , Feb 01, 2008 2:06PM

I find the use of "solipsistic" solipsistic.

9

Posted by NSD , Feb 01, 2008 2:27PM

Has anyone been able to get Ackman's model to download? I've tried several times and I keep getting an error message. Not that I've got the horsepower to recalculate it in a reasonable amount of time, but I'm still interested in viewing it.

10

Posted by Anominous , Feb 01, 2008 2:58PM

As an alternative to recapitalization Dinallo is proposing that the banks reinsure the bond insurers.

Which is the most f--ked up thing I have seen in quite some time.

Post Your Comment