(One Of) You Asked For It

Some of you have expressed distaste for the new look of things around here. “I don’t like the grey font.” “I don’t like my content on the left side.” “I don’t like having to sign in to write something [Ed. Note: You don’t.]” “I don’t like this.” “I don’t like that.” “I don’t like the italics, I may set up a competing site [Ed. Note: Do it, I fucking dare you].” “I don’t like that there aren’t any Carney Crotch shots.” “Gayest website ever after this redesign.”
One of you bet (yourself) that we probably didn’t have the “cojones” to make a poll asking who likes the new format. I can’t speak for Carney, but you, Guest at 9:02AM, bet wrong about me. Though the results will be absolutely meaningless and not get us to consider even for a second changing it back (it’s so cute that some of you thought it might), I offer you, after the jump, your mother fucking poll. I hope you enjoy it, as least as much as you enjoy the new look of DealBreaker.com


Not therapeutic enough for you? This one’s on me.

Comments (52)

  1. Posted by Cincinattus C | February 15, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    Gratuitous complaining post.

  2. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM

    Actually, the new site is very tasteful. Or, as one of my friends would say, its “….taaasteful, with three A’s”
    GAnalYst

  3. Posted by Lowly Assistant | February 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    There we go, tough fucking love!
    Get a helmet, peeps.

  4. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:11 PM

    Nick Denton is a wanker

  5. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM

    Bess, as long as you’re sucking today, why not make a deal with a graphic design team to make a comments screen that doesn’t blow?

  6. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    I’m not gonna lie, I am catching some serious Dealscape vibes here on the new look.
    http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/

  7. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:16 PM

    Your comment submission failed for the following reasons:
    Registration is required.
    Return to the original entry.

  8. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM

    @12:13 please don’t take your bitterness about the layout out on bess. what’s the matter, can’t take a little tough love?

  9. Posted by series75 | February 15, 2008 at 12:18 PM

    aww dude my name doesn’t even make ANY sense now that i can’t have the . in it. Dealbreaker, i surrender.
    -series7.5
    ps the gray italic comment font is the proxy access of fonts.
    make of that what you will.

  10. Posted by mrpink | February 15, 2008 at 12:18 PM

    I like it bitches..
    Except for the grey font/italics. And, there’s no photos of Tanner.
    -mrp

  11. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:18 PM

    The sign redesign is fine. BUT, the gray text has to go. It is nearly unreadable. I cannot handle having to squint and lean in toward my monitor to partake in Bess’s flawless prose. Please make the gray black.

  12. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM

    I’m not gonna lie, I am catching some serious Timothysykes.com vibes here on the new look.

  13. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM

    new layout sux.

  14. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:22 PM

    Bess rules
    site looks great
    the rest of you who don’t like it can keep taking it up the @

  15. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:23 PM

    You don’t work on the side polling for the Clinton campaign do you? I know you can’t put up a real poll (because you don’t have any balls – unless you get *that* operation). You like the site because “it’s pretty”? What’s next – feminine product ads?

  16. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:23 PM

    Growing on me like chlamydia

  17. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    haha YES! the cojones comment and the competing site were both my comments!
    while it would be fun to have my own blog it is so much more exciting to be quoted by bess!

  18. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    Italics = Painful
    Layout = Meh
    The whole rightside leftside argument reminds me of Zoolander.

  19. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    Growing on me like chlamydia

  20. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    seriously though, how much did you guys get took for this showstopper of a “look?”
    Stockholm Syndrome is alive and well!

  21. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:28 PM

    It’s not about the layout. It’s the lack of readability.
    Gray text, small print, italics, white background, low-resolution font, etc….
    It’s damaging to my eyes. Did your optometrist friend design this to get more business?

  22. Posted by Debter | February 15, 2008 at 12:29 PM

    hahaha, I’ll read, but I don’t have to like it.

  23. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM

    http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/stockblogs/66989;_ylt=AnnTeQ6mfKUkEFcIC_MFkBa7YWsA
    This guy is nuts. Smart? Is this guy trying to get in someone’s pants? Jewish conspiracy? Sending meat in the middle of the night? I can live with the site only if you start posting really, really hot finance girls. Or supermodels. Not wearing much.

  24. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:33 PM

    @2nd 12:25
    Im an omnireader

  25. Posted by Living the Dream | February 15, 2008 at 12:41 PM

    DealBreaker has jumped the shark.

  26. Posted by Living the Dream | February 15, 2008 at 12:43 PM

    DealBreaker has jumped the shark.

  27. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    the site looks alot like http://timothysykes.com/
    What publishing service are you using? Is this tumblr or something?

  28. Posted by american bandersnatch | February 15, 2008 at 12:46 PM

    the video never gets old

  29. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  30. Posted by Investorcluzo | February 15, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    so db and bess need a little love today? here you go…new layout means I don’t have to scroll through the ads to get to the articles on my blackberry (curve, bess); I have to admit it does look more professional (is that a good thing?); like the box that shows which articles have the most comments. phew. so can we get the black letters back now?

  31. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  32. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  33. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  34. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  35. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    oh, I guess its MT. What template then?

  36. Posted by lemmerdeur | February 15, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    I’m just glad there are no pink penises floating around on my screen… oh, wait.
    The picture uploader is broken.

  37. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 1:13 PM

    Wow…this new look is quite something…both ugly and user-unfriendly.

  38. Posted by Metlin | February 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM

    The layout isn’t too bad – it’s the italics for the comments that blows.
    And let’s face it – not that the stories are bad, but some of us visit Dealbreaker just for the comments.

  39. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM

    The only thing that sucks more than this website is DC and getting robbed in it.
    DC is probably the shitiest city in the US (right behind Cleveland, of course). And I’m ashamed to live there, especially since I am not:
    1. a Democrat
    2. a Crackhead
    3. a Meth-head
    4. a Cokehead
    5. a Pothead
    6. an e-head
    7. a prescription pain-killer-head
    8. a criminal
    DC sucks, this website sucks and we’re heading into a recession.

  40. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM

    i can’t read this shit. this website layout sucks

  41. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 2:37 PM

    I haven’t been this frightened of change since the new gal took over WallStrip.
    I lead a pathetic and meaningless existence and the one small spark of value I can find in it is predictability.
    Dam you!
    As Mr. (Ms?) Garrison of South Park Colorado would put it. “You go to hell. You go to hell and you die!”

  42. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM

    gayest. website. ever.

  43. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 3:20 PM

    bess- you are a legend…

  44. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 3:49 PM

    Italics? We don’t need no stinkin’ italics!

  45. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 3:50 PM

    webest. gaysite. ever.
    – ?

  46. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 4:01 PM

    I keep seeing that word gay used over and over here today, always incorrectly. With all this gay on the mind, I’m thinking that this long weekend there’s going to be more than the usual number of “straight” boys coming home drunk and hard and climbing into bed naked with a roommate. Good luck. Remember to blame it on the liquor when morning comes. GAnalYst

  47. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    Hideous Bess… Simply Hideous…

  48. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM

    @ 4:12- you think bess did the redesign? check out her Bear posts, moron.

  49. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 4:26 PM

    very hard to read. painful in fact. i can take your holier-than-thou sarcasm, but not your i-don’t-gave-a-crap-about-your-eyesight stupidity. your content isn’t worth the headache.

  50. Posted by guest | February 15, 2008 at 4:37 PM

    @ 4:26– bess is supposed to care about your eyesight? are you joking? and maybe take this up with their publisher and not their writers?

  51. Posted by Pender | February 15, 2008 at 8:04 PM

    Less casual homophobia please.

  52. Posted by guest | February 18, 2008 at 3:01 AM

    Does anyone else think this looks a lot like CollegeHumor?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.