master_obvious.jpgFor the bargain basement price of $400.00 you can read Standard & Poor’s thinly veiled mea culpa and distill from their “super new not old at all” methodology that Junior “AAA” tranches of defaulted, mortgage backed CDOs will recover about $0.35 and Senior “AAA” $0.60. Your tranche is rated “A”? Punt.
Criteria: Recovery Assumptions Revised For Certain CDOs Backed Predominantly By U.S. RMBS [Alacra Store]

Comments (19)

  1. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    Equity Private, did I miss something or are you yet to comment on the Zoe Cruz fluff piece / womens studies term paper in New York this week. OK OK I’m just kidding, I’m sure Zoe Cruz would eat me for breakfast and I kind of wish she would… but its odd that you haven’t commented on this, given you work in finance and are, at least anatomically, female.

  2. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:11 AM

    if her nickname is cruz-missile, I have a heat seeking guided missile looking for a short term home.

  3. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    @10:06…they already commented on the piece.

  4. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    did i miss something or is equity private an extremely budget version of bess

  5. Posted by ep | April 30, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    “Equity Private, did I miss something or are you yet to comment on the Zoe Cruz fluff piece / womens studies term paper in New York this week. OK OK I’m just kidding, I’m sure Zoe Cruz would eat me for breakfast and I kind of wish she would… but its odd that you haven’t commented on this, given you work in finance and are, at least anatomically, female.”
    The difference between New York Magazine and me is that I don’t think my anatomy/career combination is worthy of what you, quite rightly, describe as a “womens studies term paper,” much less a big “human interest” feature complete with drama-dripping, forlorn photo set.
    John Mack can hire or fire whomever he wishes. We don’t need to look at his employee-relations practices to know there’s at least a little scumbag in there somewhere.
    I’m all for women in finance. I am not at all for whiners in finance. Cruz should buck up, “no comment” to the press, pursue a legal claim if a non-frivolous one exists, else move to one of the many hedge-funds or IBs that would be delighted to have her. In the meantime? Shut the hell up and move on.

  6. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:22 AM

    @10:19 Easily said, ep, but having been there, though nowhere near that level, its all too easy to let ego get in the way. Which causes you to shout to the world that you’re worth so much more than those bastards that let you go.

  7. Posted by ep | April 30, 2008 at 10:29 AM

    That’s something that shouldn’t be shouted to the world.

  8. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:32 AM

    Well, first, I’d like to commend Zoe on her ability to rally the media. If you think about it, the whole story is pretty trivial — an executive got canned following severe losses — yet, she was able to get a cover.

    Unfortunately, however, what this story most clearly illustrates is that women do not know (yet) how to take firing as a man. When you get canned, you negotiate, negotiate further, and then if all fails, leave on decent terms. With respect. Without drama and petty commentary. Zoe’s handling of the situation, on the other hand, suggests that the only reason she’s gone as she has is BECAUSE she was a token woman.

  9. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:34 AM

    Zoe’s handling of the situation, on the other hand, suggests that the only reason she’s gone as far as she has in the corporate world is BECAUSE she was a token woman.

  10. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    Yeah I guess I am not interested in the piece as a Women’s studies term paper and more as the most revealing look we have at this particular professional. When they sent John Thain’s bitch ass down to the NYSE to make room for Lloyd it merited comment and so too does Zoe. The fact that she’s a woman adds another interesting wrinkle but this is classic power politics and I was more interested in your thoughts there. I need NY Mag to tell me bankers are sexist like I need the WSJ to tell me the klan is racist. What I do need is your keen intellect to focus on the good bits. Like what kind of fucking hit job is she trying to put in Vikram Pandit. The guy’s the ring master of the greatest (shit) show on earth, does Zoe really think this article is going to bother him?
    (Although I do think they should have let Krawcheck run Citi, I mean what’s the worst she could do? Ruin the banks balance sheet on shaky mortgages and nearly bring the global banking system too its knees? Too late for that)

  11. Posted by diablo | April 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM

    @10:32 AM
    I don’t follow your logic of saying that Zoe was a token woman in that organization.
    Second, when the top banana is the one firing you, you must rely on the terms of your contract regarding the eventuality of a firing. Negotiating at that point seemed useless to me. The terms all are in your contract, and there were probably pretty good terms.

  12. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 10:42 AM

    Krawcheck can’t recruit. Vik can recruit.

  13. Posted by Anal_yst | April 30, 2008 at 10:55 AM

    My question, albeit admittedly a pretty retarded one, is Meredith Whitney (trying to be) the next Sallie Krawcheck? More importantly, does she chance an ice cube’s chance in hell?

  14. Posted by diablo | April 30, 2008 at 11:01 AM

    Anal, yes your question sounds retarded. What’s the connection?

  15. Posted by Anal_yst | April 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM

    Diablo, you know Sallie was formerly an equity analyst @ Bernstein, and an open critic of Citi, right?

  16. Posted by Anal_yst | April 30, 2008 at 11:35 AM

    wow, just re-read that, should have read “…does she STAND and ice cubes chance in hell?” pre-coffee, my bad

  17. Posted by guest | April 30, 2008 at 11:47 AM

    Anal_yst where da f*** do you work to afford to be pre-coffee at 11 AM? Or do you work at all?

  18. Posted by Pro_Forma | April 30, 2008 at 12:09 PM
  19. Posted by Anal_yst | April 30, 2008 at 12:18 PM

    @ 11:47
    Clearly, I can’t afford to be pre-coffee @ 11am, hence constructing sentences with randomly missing words/clauses/etc…

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.