• 04 Apr 2008 at 9:05 AM

Ugly Employment Numbers

By

That 80,000 job loss number for released by the Labor Department earlier this morning represents the biggest decline in jobs in five years, although it’s only slightly worse than the 76,000 jobs lost in each of January and February. If we needed any more evidence that we’re in a recession, well here it is.

    Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

    Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

    — Advertisement —

    Comments (12)

    1. 1
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 9:34 AM

      You certainly didn’t have to come back from vacation for this.

    2. 2
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 9:43 AM

      Agreed. Go.

    3. 3
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM

      List of things that don’t have anything to do with what markets do, no matter what Bloomberg’s headline writers think:
      1. Monthly employment numbers
      2. Purchasing managers’ index
      3. Testimony to Congress
      4. GDP figures
      5. Surveys of economists
      The market is a future discounting mechanism, people. Last month’s employment number is really fucking irrelevant to decisions you make today.

    4. 4
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 10:30 AM

      I’m not your friend, guy!

    5. 5
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM

      @10:28 – to know where you are going, it can be very useful to know where you’ve come from and the direction you’ve recently been traveling in. A crystal ball is better but apparently most people don’t have them.

    6. 6
      Posted by Anonymous | April 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM

      I”m surprised at how little discussion there is on the American Axle impact to these numbers.

    7. 7
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 10:56 AM

      @10:28 – a future discounting mechanism based on what information set? Today’s…

    8. 8
      Posted by diablo | April 4, 2008 at 11:43 AM

      Nothing to see here. Move on, Carney continue your vacation:
      Lazear Says He `Doesn’t Focus Too Much’ on U.S. Jobless Rate
      By Betty Liu and Shobhana Chandra
      April 4 (Bloomberg) — President George W. Bush’s chief economist said he’s not paying too much attention lately to the U.S. unemployment rate.
      “I don’t focus too much on the monthly unemployment rate because it has been a bit volatile,” Edward Lazear, chairman of Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, said in a Bloomberg Television interview.
      Lazear’s comments followed a Labor Department report earlier today that showed U.S. employers cut 80,000 jobs in March and unemployment rose to 5.1 percent, from 4.8 percent a month earlier. By historical standards, Lazear said joblessness isn’t that high compared with past recessions.
      “Even at 5.1 percent, I would point out that that is still a historically low rate of unemployment, well below the average for the 90s, which was 5.8 percent, so we still have a decent labor market,” he said.
      He added, “obviously we don’t like to see negative job growth.”
      Lazear, a Stanford University labor market economist, said the Bush administration’s forecast for the economy to accelerate in the second half of the year is on target.

    9. 9
      Posted by Jmoney | April 4, 2008 at 11:44 AM

      I’m not you guy, buddy!

    10. 10
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 1:26 PM

      Shut up you hoes.

    11. 11
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 1:35 PM

      I’m not your buddy, friend!

    12. 12
      Posted by guest | April 4, 2008 at 2:15 PM

      I’m not your friend, guy!

    Leave a comment

    You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.

       or