Sorkin Versus The Shareholder Superman
ARS-ED: Andrew Ross Sorkin Educates DealBreaker

ARS-ED is a new weekly feature on what we're learning from Andrew Ross Sorkin's weekly column, DealBook, in the New York Times.

It was about a year and a half ago when we first saw New York Times hotshot Andrew Ross Sorkin in the same room as Carl Icahn. They were on a panel together at some midtown club, discussing exactly what you'd expect Sorkin--who runs DealBook for the Times and is the paper's top M&A reporter (and is rumored to be in the running to take the top editorial job at the Wall Street Journal)--and Icahn to discuss: deals, CEOs and money.

(After the jump, more on what we learned at that panel and what we learned this week from Sorkin.)

We probably would have tuned out the chat (we're terrible at paying attention to conference panels) except for three things. First, Icahn is a fantastic story teller. He's got an anecdote for every point he makes. (He's even taken a stab at standup comedy.) Second, Sorkin's got a confident, almost flip, way about him that completely belies his loose-limbed gangly appearance. You expect him seem at least a bit nerdy and instead he comes across like Tiger Woods teeing off. You expect the Boy Wonder of the Times will be awkward but he's charming. The contrast between expectations and performance is enthralling. Sorkin under promises and over delivers. Third, and most important, we were fascinated by the familiarity between these two men. As we said over a year ago, those two are tight.

Even before the panel began, we noticed how well Sorkin and Icahn got along. Sorkin had arrived early and was chatting with some serious looking people about serious sounding things, sipping something that may or may not have been alcoholic. Icahn blustered in late, seemingly oblivious to the fact that all eyes were on him, and instantly ordered a vodka martini. Almost immediately he and Sorkin were chatting away, Sorkin asking questions in a way that reminded me of a less petulant Luke Skywalker talking to Yoda. Or maybe a novice a Buddhist temple. Icahn was more than happy to play Yoda, the head monk.

But we didn't know the two were dating. Okay, it's not romantic. It's closer to bromantic. It's a man date. Here's Sorkin in the latest edition of his weekly column, complaining that Icahn showed up to the date late and ordered a drink before even saying hello.

About a month and a half ago, Carl Icahn and I went to dinner at Tse Yang, an upscale Chinese restaurant in Midtown Manhattan. Mr. Icahn, the corporate raider turned activist investor, came blustering through the dimly lit restaurant about 20 minutes late, grabbed one of the waiters -- they all know him -- and ordered a martini.

Icahn comes across as charming, perhaps a bit weary (Sorkin notes he slumps and sighs after a tough day) and the man definitely believes he is something of the Superman of Shareholders, battling entrenched management and complacent boards on behalf of the common shareholder.

As Henry Blodget, over at Alley Insider, points out, under Times rules Sorkin probably had to pay for Icahn's drinks and the dinner, since reporters aren't normally allowed to accept gifts from story subjects. But Sorkin makes Icahn pay for those twenty minutes by revealing that when Icahn tried to call Steve Ballmer by going through the Microsoft switchboard, Ballmer wouldn't take his call.

And, near the end of the column, Sorkin takes a slap at Icahn's business acumen and issues a warning to Yahoo shareholders that might be tempted to vote for Icahn's control of the company. "Activists like Mr. Icahn may be great at making money by flipping companies," Sorkin writes, "but they are less great at operating them."

And then we remembered that, eventually, Luke Skywalker disobeys Yoda and flies off to save his friends.

A Gamble, but What if He Wins? [New York Times]

Comments

1

Posted by Anal_yst , May 20, 2008 3:34PM

I feel like ARS is a bit of a little weasel, although as this suggests, he does so at his own risk of cannibalizing the access which got him to this point in the first place.

2

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 3:45PM

test

3

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 3:53PM

Sorkin is a moron that doesn't understand his own beat. That, combined with his litany of errors reminds me of Jeffrey Toobin. Both of them are journalistic starfuckers, chasing "hot" stories like the OJ trial or Triple CCC like bottomfeeders.

4

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 4:23PM

More like Andrew Ross-Dorkin...OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH....GET EM

5

Posted by counterclockwise , May 20, 2008 4:31PM

I've never seen a TV commentator with moister eyes than Sorkin. I don't agree that he comes off as a Tiger Woods of journalism -- to me he seems like an overactive cocker spaniel. Whenever I see him on TV I feel it's a waste of my time, because more experienced people are available to comment and frankly, he annoys me.

I don't agree with @3:53pm about Jeffrey Toobin. Toobin writes frequent well-informed articles for the New Yorker and recently published a very good book about the Supreme Court. Usually his television legal commentary is based on standard issue law school analysis or his experience as a prosecutor and it's pretty rational, but on a few occasions I've seen him on CNN overreach about trivial celebrity-related legal matters. I wonder why he bothers. Also, I don't know why he wastes his time as a political analyst, because it isn't his forte.

6

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 6:08PM

Has he ever been out on a date ?

7

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 6:14PM

How old is he ? 12 ?

8

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 6:43PM

Did anyone else hear Blumpkin call Icahn a simpleton? Uncle Carl is not going to be happy.

-NSD

9

Posted by guest , May 20, 2008 9:50PM

Hey, counterclockwise, do I understand you right? Toobin is "well-informed" but puts out "standard issue law school"-level analysis "about trivial celebrity" news and "wastes his time" with politics? Did you just talk yourself into agreeing with me?

--3:53

10

Posted by counterclockwise , May 20, 2008 11:01PM

@9:50pm. I think we are somewhat in agreement, but not completely.

I'm not aware of Toobin's "litany of errors." If I'm naive, clue me in.

I said Toobin was "well-informed" in his writing. Everything he's written that I have read seems well-informed, and occasionally very insightful.

Yes, his analysis of trivial celebrity news sometimes falls to the level of principles taught in law school.

Is Toobin motivated to appear on television to become intimately familiar with famous people or is he ambitious to achieve fame for himself? Many writers dream of becoming famous, so I give him the benefit of the doubt on this.

I am sure Toobin comments on some stories because his CNN contract requires him to do so.

Toobin should stay out of political commentary because he can't do everything well. Legal expertise does not equal political expertise. I just heard him hair-splitting on CNN about tonight's meaningless primaries.

Writing, excellent; analysis of breaking news stories, above average to forgettable; instant political commentary, fish out of water.

11

Posted by guest , May 21, 2008 6:55AM

The underlying message of this utterly pointless post was that John Carney wants to be Andrew Sorkin.

Which follows up on a pointless article which has an underlying message that Andrew Sorkin wants to be Carl Icahn.

Post Your Comment