BankAtlantic Sues Bove

richardbove.JPGLadenburg analyst Richard Bove released a very helpful (if you're looking for short ideas) report last week called "Who Is Next," listing firms in ascending order of financial health. It was pretty grim (especially if you were anywhere near the top)! This upset a bunch of truth suppressors who proceeded to flip out, and Bove was strong armed into clarifying his outlook concerning the state of banking, saying that, actually, "the main thrust of [the] report is that the banks are in better condition than is generally perceived" and that the implication that there are significant problems in the financial system "was not the point at all." It was also stressed that National City (NCC) and First Horizon (FHN) are "definitely not" in the danger zone.

Unfortunately, Bove didn't have time to slog through the entire list and said nothing about Bank Atlantic, which was listed only a few slots better than IndyMac. A more self-assured/solvent bank probably would've let the snub fly but BBX is neither. Instead, for this most egregious presentation of facts, Bank Atlantic has slapped Bove/Landenburg's ass with a lawsuit seeking damages for defamation and negligence. Bank Atlantic's chairman Alan B. Levan also released a statement insinuating that perhaps others were unjustly maligned in the report as well, and rather cattily referred to Bove's analysis in air quotes ("Although we do not know how many errors appear in the Bove 'analysis,' we do know about BankAtlantic"), which must mean they're really pissed. Who is next (to sue Bove)? Haven't done any "analysis" yet but we really want it to be IDMC.

Earlier: What I Meant To Say Was-- BUY INDY

Dick Bove's Going To Make You Rich

Statement from Bank Atlantic's chairman Alan B. Levan:

In the wake of the highly publicized failure of IndyMac, breathless television reporters filled the airwaves with the repeated question on the minds of an anxious public: "who is next?" Of course, if there is anyone who knows "who is next," it would be the folks at the FDIC with mountains of detailed financial information about every institution enjoying deposit insurance. They, however, keep what they know to themselves - for good reason. Thus, without an official answer based on real information, some members of the media, anxious to fill the gap of knowledge caused by the FDIC's silence turned to what seemed to be the next best thing: a supposed expert who said he knew the answer and was willing to share it with an anxious national audience - Richard X. Bove and Ladenburg, his employer. The problem is that, while Bove's report purports to consider which banks might fail, he failed to examine the health of the banks and thrifts in his report. Instead, he only examined holding company data which, in at least our case, is meaningless information. This is simply shocking.

Although we do not know how many errors appear in the Bove
"analysis," we do know about BankAtlantic. Had Mr. Bove examined the
financial condition of BankAtlantic, the FDIC insured institution, he
would have discovered the following: (i) in every measurable category,
BankAtlantic is "well capitalized;" (ii) BankAtlantic's ratio of
non-performing loans to total loans is, in this market, an enviable
1.25%; (iii) BankAtlantic's ratio of non-performing loans to its
capital and reserves is 12.5%; and, (iv) Bove's "Danger Zone" was
above 5% of non-performing loans to total loans and above 40% of
non-performing loans to total common equity plus reserves.
BankAtlantic's numbers are not even close. (While this information was
as of March 31, 2008, the information as of June 30, 2008, will not be
significantly different.)

These are not opinions. They are facts. And these are just some of
the many measurable criteria that any knowledgeable person acting in
good faith would use to determine where BankAtlantic should sit on the
fear index - the answer is, of course, nowhere. Based on these facts -
indeed, undisputed facts - no one would ever conclude that
BankAtlantic belongs to any list of "next."

Notwithstanding these undisputed facts, on July 13, 2008, Richard
X. Bove and Ladenburg published a report with a title that turned the
question on the minds of many into an answer: "Who Is Next." In it,
Bove and Ladenburg identified two "methodologies" that, according to
them, could be used to determine whether a "bank or thrift" was in or
near what they called "the danger zone." He then took data provided by
a research firm on bank and thrift holding companies, asserted and
implied that holding company data represented the financial condition
of insured subsidiaries, and undertook to specifically identify
"institutions" that, according to him, were in or near the "danger
zone." In the case of BankAtlantic, the financial statements of its
two holding companies do not mirror the banking subsidiary, even if
such a methodology made sense. BankAtlantic's two holding Companies,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BFC Financial Corporation contain other
assets and business lines which make the comparison nonsensical.
Simply by way of example of the gross errors in this "analysis," Bove
compared the non-performing loans of BankAtlantic with the capital of
BFC Financial Corporation, a public company that owns 23% of
BankAtlantic Bancorp that in turn owns BankAtlantic and other business
lines. The so-called analysis itself was totally false and the
impression it created foreseeable.

The problem we face is that the indisputable facts are now buried
in the sensational headlines Bove and Ladenburg have falsely created -
and, for whatever reason, have refused to retract. Literally dozens of
other analysts and commentators have picked up on the Bove "analysis,"
assumed its legitimacy, and passed it on to a growing audience on the
Internet. Soon, the falsehood will be presumed true and the truth
false, leading us to regretfully conclude that the only way
BankAtlantic can clear its name from this irresponsible defamation -
and that is what it is - is in the courthouse.

While we work through this process, we also want everyone to know
that, before publishing or republishing the Bove Report, or providing
him an audience to repeat it, one should do what the Bove Report did
not do - look at the publicly available financial information which
makes clear that BankAtlantic is financially strong and well
positioned to serve its customers and the community.

Comments

1

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 3:17PM

BBX should spend more of those legal dollars trying to collect on their crappy condo loans in South Florida.

2

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 3:21PM

Ashton Kutcher: "Hey, BankAtlantic! You just got Dick'd!"

3

Posted by ab, Jul 21, 2008 3:24PM

Once BBX wins this lawsuit, maybe they'll be solvent?

4

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 3:27PM

how could this possibly have merit?

5

Posted by lemmerdeur, Jul 21, 2008 3:44PM

Maybe they can dig up $100 million or so and buy the naming rights to some crappy-as stadium, and rename it "BankAtlantic WTF Mortgage Tsunami Arenafield".

Maybe they can buy the Mets stadium naming rights from Citi. They could sure use the cash.

6

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 3:51PM

Mayb Bank atlantic can just buy Ladenburg and fir Bove. Ladenburg can't be worth more than $500,000 all in anyway!

7

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 4:32PM

Bank Atlantic is toast. The management team is a bunch of schemers.

Typical ploy! attack! attach! obscure the true issue...suck it dry and move to israel!

8

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 4:36PM

lol "i'll sue you!"


joosians... (((rollseyes)))

9

Posted by guest, Jul 21, 2008 4:39PM

typical.

my only hope is that the words of these pigs used to "defend" themselves get used against them in the upcoming class action lawsuits which will occur after the certain bankruptcy of bankatlantic.

i better be quiet now, i don't want to get jued, i mean, er, sued.


10

Posted by guest, Jul 22, 2008 7:54AM

Bove is a douche, couldn't make it in NYC so he ran south flapping his jaws to all the retards watching CNBC...

11

Posted by guest, Jul 22, 2008 9:54AM

Dick Bove - WTF is Dick Bove?!? Congrads to Bank Atlantic for making an absolute nobody somebody.

12

Posted by guest, Jul 22, 2008 10:26AM

HAHAHAHAAA>>>> LAWYERS!!! Listen. Bove's interview on Fox Biz right after the suit hit the tape shows he feels his research was right on the money. I remind y'all that 3 years ago it was a 20 dollar stock. Check out the clip
http://liz.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/22/bring-in-the-lawyers/

13

Posted by guest, Aug 01, 2008 4:28PM

August 1, 2008

I am writing today in reference to shameful and criminal acts by Bank Atlantic. On July 22, 2008 I logged into my account online too see that I had been charged $160 in overdraft fees in one day. This happened shortly after I was fired by a crooked employer who to this day still not has paid me money that I am owed. I deposited a check into the account from my wife’s employer the previous weekend that cleared without issue, but not until the following Wednesday, the day after I was charged the fees. These overdraft fees were a result of me and my wife using my Bank Atlantic bank card to make purchases.

Having several conversations with multiple representatives from this bank, I have discovered that they have policies in place to ensure that these charges will be forced, and that they will in fact rearrange the order of any card transactions to maximize these charges. I asked again today why my transactions are simply not declined if I do not have available funds to cover the transaction. I was told by a bank manager that since I deposited a check in advance, their system would approve the transaction, and then charge me an overdraft fee if the transaction hits the bank before my deposit clears. So if I had not made the deposit, the transactions could have been denied and I would not have been charged the transactions. But since they knew there was more money on the way, they had the ability to simply take that money from me.

I have also been told that when these transactions clear, the bank system intentionally puts them in order from largest to smallest. This policy ensures that the maximum amount is taken out first, so that the account is considered overdrawn when the smaller transactions are applied. This allows for additional overdraft fees to be applied even if the account wasn’t actually overdrawn when those smaller purchases were made.

This has happened at a time when I am having severe issues providing for my wife and child. As I mentioned, I was recently let go by a crooked employer who is refusing to pay me money he owes me. I was struggling to find a job when this happened, as are many other Americans right now. And I am still trying to find a way to borrow the money required to pay my families rent. I am also concerned about being able to pay for gas to get to the new job I start next week.

I have had several conversations with a number of representatives regarding the 5 overdraft fees that hit my account. I was treated like I was the single most worthless human being on the planet by some of the Bank Atlantic customer service reps, although a handful of people did express concern for my family. Taking $160 from my family while knowing that so many families are struggling to make ends meet is not how any professional organization does business. This is the single most shameful act I have had to deal with seen in my life. Knowing that I had $160 taken from me, I was told by Bank Atlantic representatives that I was being difficult, I was told to "get over it," I was insulted several times, and my wife was treated in a similar manner. Because of my complaints, they are now closing my account.

This is a bank that is open 7 days a week, every time I go into the bank they ask me to refer a friend, and they give gifts to those who open accounts. I’m sure if I did the math, I would find that they spend more than $160 on marketing per person to get these accounts open. So how do they justify pushing me to the side over this amount of money? This is a large amount to my family, but can’t be much to a bank. I cannot be expected to believe that the way in which they handled these transactions to maximize the overdraft charges is legal. It certainly is not ethical, and organizations such as Bank Atlantic must be held to higher ethical standards. We see from the current housing and credit crises that there is a large economic impact when banks decide to brush aside ethics.

Post Your Comment