Bunning To Bernanke: You Are A Systemic Risk

Ben Bernanke's plan to expand the authority of the Federal Reserve ran into a a razor-wire fence on Capitol Hill when Senator Jim Bunning blasted the Fed's performance, blaming Bernanke's monetary easing for the decline of the dollar, the rise of oil prices and rising inflation.

"The Fed is asking for more power but the Fed has proven they cannot be trusted with the power they had," Bunning said. "Now the Fed wants to be a systemic risk regulator. But the Fed is a systemic risk."

More colorfully, Bunning, the Hall of Fame baseball pitcher with the 6.35 ERA rookie season, said expanding the powers of the Fed would be like giving the neighborhood kid who broke a window a bigger bat. He promised to do everything in his power to stop the Fed.

Bunning, who has long been a critic of Bernanke, didn't seem to garner much support from his colleagues on the Hill, who made light of the harshly worded criticism. This is pretty typical of the treatment that critics of the Fed get on Capitol Hill, as Congressman Ron Paul has long known.

Bunning has lately come under attack from Democrats, who are upset at his opposition to The Bank of America housing bailout bill. In a particularly personal line of attack, and a breach of the Senate's usually genteel ethics, Democrats been saying that Bunning isn't really a Senator, he's just a baseball player. So far Bunning has refused to respond by saying things like, "Oh, yeah, Robert Byrd? I guess I should have been a Klansman instead. And, you there, Ted Kennedy, well, I'll let you off since you're still sick. No need to drive off that bridge just now..."

This doesn't bode well for the chances that the proposals to expand the Fed's power will be examined very critically or deliberated extensively by lawmakers.

Comments

1

Posted by merkin capital partners, Jul 15, 2008 11:55AM

for every 1 coherent question there have been 5 completely wheels off inquiries. A bank teller could ask better questions than these 'tards.

No one cares that your constituents are poor.

2

Posted by bank_teller, Jul 15, 2008 11:59AM

thanks, you rock also!

3

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:10PM

Of course no politician wants to alter the fundamental role of the Fed in printing up the money for their hare-brained schemes. Look at the massive increase in the size of government since the Fed was created. Now we have the biggest government in history with $50 trillion of unfunded liabilities. Where else is that $50 trillion going to come from other than Ben's helicopters?

4

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:12PM

Carney, maybe we can have Bunning call you up and scream at you for not knowing how to edit a column. Dude, this is getting embarrassing.

"I don't make money, I print it"

5

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:13PM

is it just me or does big ben seem nervous, it's disheartening to hear the man who is leading us through the thick wilderness, speak with a quivering voice...

6

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:15PM

Bunning makes it clear he thinks the Fed has done a shitty job. However, it's not clear who he thinks could do the job better. Congress? I'd rather have economists in charge of the money supply than dudes whose primary concern is getting re-elected every couple years.

7

Posted by diablo, Jul 15, 2008 12:16PM

Everybody in that room, including Bernanke, knows that Bunning is senile.

8

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:20PM

We need an economist in charge just not THIS economist. Bernanke is simply not the right man for the job. We need somebody in there who is going to do what is best for the country not what is most popular or politically expedient.

9

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:27PM

My boy Sen Dodd is the only one with a clear head.

I love these Congressmen, they have all these written statements they are reading, not their own thoughts. Bunch of scumbags...

10

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:30PM

@12:20,
so do you propose we get maestro maverick ole Greenspan back? So that he can screw the country up any further.

remember he's the one that created this shit show we're all living through right now. bernanke is just there for damage control.

11

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:31PM

Dodd is neck deep in this mortgage mess.

12

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:33PM

We are lucky to have someone at the helm of the FOMC that understands that tight credit in a time of asset price deflation will cause an unually long recession/depression. Those that disapprove of Bernanke and would rather have a perennial inflation hawk as chairman should take a look at Japan circa 1990.

13

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:39PM

jim bunning needs to merge with ashley dupri in order to survive.

14

Posted by merkin capital partners, Jul 15, 2008 12:43PM

Where is my favorite congresswoman from last year?

"So you were the CEO of Goldman Sachs?"

"No I was CEO of the Princeton economics dept."

15

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:47PM

@merkin: In the House, of course!

16

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:49PM

My boy Ben gets on the Hill and oil drops 8 bucks!

17

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:50PM

lets call it for what it is - carney is an unfunny lib who can't hack it at journalism

18

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:52PM

WTF - SEC now restricting the way you can short ONLY FREDDIE AND FANNIE - U.S.S.A.

19

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:52PM

Ssshhhh! Bunning! Don't mess with the status quo. You'll kill the golden goose.

So long as Congress/Senate focus on short-term fixes to score headlines and get re-elected, you will never get a real long-term solution.

20

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 12:53PM

@12:52

you have no legal right to short.

and i'm no short basher.

but the game comes with risks.

21

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:00PM

Understand that. But how can the SEC come out with special rules that ONLY protect two public companies?

22

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:02PM

Adam Smith is rolling in his grave.

23

Posted by PatrickBateman, Jul 15, 2008 1:04PM

@ Merkin

Just checked the Banking Committee's website. That retard congresswoman is no longer part of the Committee. HA!

Can't imagine why...

A while back I think I remember her saying something like, "I've got constituants with no jobs, living with their mamas. What are you (Ben) going to do about it?"

Bernanke - "I don't think a check will help."

Her lack of knowledge speaks volumes.

24

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:11PM


The SEC's just-announced rule is to require that traders borrow the stock before they put the short on, in terms of FNM, FRE and the primary dealers.

Why isn't this already the case for all stocks?

25

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:13PM

So basically don't do anything to change the underlying issues with the fannie or freddie just change the rules about how the traders exploit those "issues"?? And do that half way through the ball game?

26

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:14PM

Luv it. Yeah. curtail naked short selling. That'll work out real well down the road. That way, when these firms take the long dirt nap, the stock prices will go STRAIGHT to zero. With a bunch of shorts in the stock, you at least have someone there willing to buy on the way down.

Welcome to the U.S.S.A.

This country is becoming a joke.

27

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:15PM

hi 1:00


thank you for being reasonable.

special rules exist on the long side as well with all sorts of crap like 144 sales, reg d sales, special margin requirements for certain stocks, etc.

in fact, my discount broker just notified me that bank of america has special margin requirements for purchases.

do you support that idea?

28

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:17PM

reg sho is a joke and not enforced, unless we, i mean they, are looking to get you some other crap.

29

Posted by ab, Jul 15, 2008 1:24PM

rookie ERA of over 6? what a joke. he's got no business talking baseball or economics.

30

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:25PM

Screw more regulation for the banks, and primary dealers lets just regulate the traders - cuz that will solve the problem.

31

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:25PM


Shorting a stock without having to borrow it beforehand, coupled with the lack of an uptick rule, means that you could conceivably sell an infinite amount of stock short instantaneously.

The fact that the SEC and the SROs haven't been policing this aspect of the markets already is a joke.

As for 1:14 pm ("Yeah. curtail naked short selling"), your argument makes absolutely no sense.

-- Anon4Life

32

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:29PM

i remember the good old days of wall street, when our #1 priority was building a fancy midtown hq, so we could get out of putrid downtown and off of wall street.

sort of ironic that DB and GS are still downtown, no?

lol x million~1111~~~~!!1111

33

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:41PM

As an aside does anyone know what happened to Paulson's pinkey because it sort of freaks me out.

34

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:48PM

Anon4Life @ 1.25pm-

I don't think that's correct. To carry out your logic....

So what if you shorted it to ZERO? At some point if the business is worth anything it will attract investing dollars that will ultimately drive the stock higher. At some point, short sellers have to cover.

Using your logic, if i had a ton of money I could just start naked short selling AAPL stock all the way down to ZERO. Could I do that? NO. Nobody is bigger than the marketplace.

There are rules in place regarding short selling. The SEC should be enforcing those rules. Anyone found breaking those rules or the spirt of the law should be punished.

However, I think governments should adopt rules that legitimize greater amounts of short selling. Shorts provide an extremely valuable function and should be encouraged. It's not unAmerican to be skeptical.

35

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:52PM

What's up with that hideous watch that Paulson is wearing? Looks like HE is a victim of subprime.

36

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:53PM

@1:29

why is that ironic?

37

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:55PM

Jim Bunning is a drunk

38

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 1:55PM

Jim Bunning is a drunk and a pedophile

39

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:02PM

hi 1:53

i think it's ironic because it seems like db and gs are the only 2 shops who aren't up to their necks in this mortgage crap.

firms like bear and lehman thought they could buy some class by being in midtown instead of grimy downtown.

just a casual observation.

i'm probably wrong.


40

Posted by merkin capital partners, Jul 15, 2008 2:04PM

wtf is wrong with paulson's finger? been in the dike too long?

41

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:06PM

Bunning , as a Senator , is a great baseball player


he should go back to making moonshine with his brother

42

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:14PM

Paulson's finger is bent from hitting the sell button too much , while shorting FNM , FRE stock the last few weeks

43

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:15PM

Does anyone else get nervous when Paulson and Bernanke get speeches or testimony...

Paulson got this annoying stammering problem and Bernanke has this shaky, quivering, scared tone.

Need to get Arnold Schwarzaneggar up there as some kind of combo Fed Chief/Treasury God..... "AHM TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW, ECONOMY! YOU WILL BE STRONGER BECAUSE AHM TELLING YOU TO BE STRONGER.!"

44

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:17PM

@2:02pm

thats what i thought you meant, just double checking

45

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 2:26PM

Bunning is a hillbilly

46

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 3:03PM

Bunning may be all those things that one associates with Kentucky but he's right. Dodd is a clown and got that job because his father was a popular senator in CT decades ago.

47

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 3:12PM

Dodd's father was censured , one of the few in Senate history

49

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 7:18PM

It's OK for Bunning to protect a bunch of multi-millionaire thoroughbred breeders with the largest tax breaks in the country in his Lexington , Kentucky neighborhood .... and that's not socialism ????

50

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 8:27PM

@7:18

There are only a few problems with your outrage. One, Bunning has never carried the central Kentucky thoroughbred farm vote. Two, thoroughbred breeders and owners have seen a crippling of any "tax breaks" over the past decade. Three, more than 90% of thoroughbred breeding operations lose money. Four, Bunning doesn't live anywhere close to Lexington. Other than that, fire away. Outrage is always good at a time like this, even when misdirected and uninformed.

51

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 10:42PM

Yuck, I don't know about all that. If you noticed, Bernanke was very careful -not- to use the word "recession," but things like "the economy has continued to expand." What exactly does that mean? I was pretty entertained by this translation of BB's speech: http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/15/federal_reserve_chairman_ben_b_1_7732.php

52

Posted by StMarc, Jul 15, 2008 10:55PM

The last thing, the very last thing, that Congress is going to do is take power away from the Fed. They'll shovel it onto Bernanke's cranium like they're trying to regrow his hair.

Why?

Because *this is not going to work.* I'm not loading magazines just yet but there are too many plates on top of too many sticks and Benny Boy is getting tired and running out of uppers. (How's THAT for a hideous metaphor?) We are going to have a "hard landing," and it will only be a landing assuming any of us walk away.

After that we'll pick up the pieces and get on with things - a few rich people will be broke and a few poor people will be rich but otherwise it'll come back together. But Congress is going to lay the whole thing on the Fed, the Treasury, and Wall Street, and to really get away with that they need to give Bernanke and Paulson every bloody inch of rope they ask for so they hang high, high in the trees and don't stink up Capitol Hill.

M

53

Posted by diablo, Jul 15, 2008 11:29PM

Hey for a saint you are quite politically astute. I see what you are seeing.

54

Posted by guest, Jul 15, 2008 11:36PM

every time you take down theBL towel pic i will put it back up:
http://tinyurl.com/67h2uk

55

Posted by John Carney, Jul 16, 2008 12:50AM

Dude, that's just creepy. Cut it out and go away.

56

Posted by guest, Jul 16, 2008 2:04AM

Bunning is dead on!!! Let the free market decide. We don't need the FED. We're in this situation because we don't have a free market. We have socialism for the rich.

Do you want to be rich? Invest your money and do not save. If something goes wrong, the FED will bail you out with tax payers money. Only suckers save. The dollar is design to go down every year. Interest doesn't even cover inflation. Don't be an idiot.

57

Posted by guest, Jul 16, 2008 2:06AM

"Oh, yeah, Robert Byrd? I guess I should have been a Klansman instead. And, you there, Ted Kennedy, well, I'll let you off since you're still sick. No need to drive off that bridge just now..."

that pretty fucking funny of Bunning.

58

Posted by guest, Jul 16, 2008 2:07AM

bunning is a better stand up comedian than baseball player

Post Your Comment