And don’t forget: buy Bear Stearns. [CNBC]

Comments (34)

  1. Posted by AJ | July 31, 2008 at 1:49 PM

    SELL!

  2. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 1:50 PM

    Setting your money on fire is more fun than following Cramer’s advice.

  3. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 1:54 PM

    also more profitable

  4. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:05 PM

    You’re so right. Why don’t you have a show on CNBC?

  5. Posted by chad | July 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    you idiots, the market bottomed months ago. whats going on right now is just tremors.

  6. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    drill, drill, drill!

  7. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:07 PM

    buy my book buy my book- i hate that guy

  8. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:12 PM

    BUY FINANCIALS!!!

  9. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:12 PM

    BUY FINANCIALS!!!

  10. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:27 PM

    one more time

  11. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:28 PM

    Put all your money in GM. It can only go up.

  12. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:31 PM

    Put all your money in GM. It can only go up now.

  13. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:38 PM

    GM is AMC ver.2008

  14. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:39 PM

    WTF WaMu up 20%

  15. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 2:59 PM

    Cramer declaring the market has bottomed is so Tuesday. Last night Cramer was in a cheerful, skippy mood because the market had rallied two days in a row.
    Cue Jimi Hendrix. Manic … depression … is a frus-tra-ting mess!

  16. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:10 PM

    wamu sold 6% to UK hedge fund
    the funny part is the Oct 4 puts trading up on the news

  17. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM
  18. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:20 PM

    Will someone explain to me how could the market have bottomed as long as the SEC has protected certain financial companies from short sellers (and not just naked short sellers. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some Banks are not executing ANY short trades on the “protected few”)
    Moreover, how about the continued presence of the discount window (now open until Jan 2009 – merry christmas?).
    As long as these “special protections” exisit there can be no REAL bottom.

  19. Posted by Debter | July 31, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    18 is correct, I don’t think we’ve seen the capitulation trade just yet, and you won’t as long as big brother (US Gov’t) is protecting his little brothers (banks, fannie and freddie) from the bullies (aka short sellers). Whatever, I say go on vacation this month a la ALL OF F’ING EUROPE (who seem to be all over the city).

  20. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:38 PM

    WaMu didn’t sell 6% to UK hedge fund. The UK hedgefund bot that stock in the open market averaging down on a position that Toscafund started on when WaMu was $40. Yes they spent $500 million averaging down, but they did so in the open market and WaMu got NOTHING.
    Toscafunds performance this year is about -35% to -40%.
    WaMu CANNOT rally issue stock due to the ratchet clause contained in their $8.50 financing.

  21. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:39 PM

    WaMu didn’t sell 6% to UK hedge fund. The UK hedgefund bot that stock in the open market averaging down on a position that Toscafund started on when WaMu was $40. Yes they spent $500 million averaging down, but they did so in the open market and WaMu got NOTHING.
    Toscafunds performance this year is about -35% to -40%.
    WaMu CANNOT rally issue stock due to the ratchet clause contained in their $8.50 financing.

  22. Posted by Johnny | July 31, 2008 at 3:42 PM

    @ 16
    I know the WM is old news already, but when a stock pops 20% (for any reason) there will ALWAYS be people looking to short it, buy puts, etc. Why the confusion?

  23. Posted by pdtrading | July 31, 2008 at 3:49 PM

    Is it too late to get Jimbo convicted for a crime he didn’t commit so he can get sodomized in prison?

  24. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    Was I the only one watching about 7 months ago when that clown declared the so-called sub prime problem wasn’t a problem at all and was limited to a couple of guys at a corner desk made a bad bet on a few mortgages.
    Could anyone have been further removed from reality.
    More Cool Aid please

  25. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 4:02 PM

    Cramers blog title on his site is “Yeah, So? It’s Some Profit-Taking”. That tells you all you need to know.

  26. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 4:10 PM

    hi #11,
    gm bonds (senior stuff) appear to me to be a screaming buy here.
    49 cents on dollar yields you like 17%.
    so you either double your money every 4 years
    or
    you’re buying a cheap warrant/option on a restructuring IPO.
    obama already tipped his hand that GM will get bailed out the gubment.
    so there’s your insurance.

  27. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 4:13 PM

    being a bondholder gives you like superhero powers.
    you can petition for a liquidation of assets.
    which is why they always wind up “bribing” the bondholders with lots of extra equity.
    which you promptly sell of course.
    you get some nice legal tax benefits here as well.

  28. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 4:45 PM

    Gotta love senior secured debt.

  29. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 5:21 PM

    All the rules coming down the PIPE(CRACK) from the SEC, FED, TSY are all meant to do one thing only…BUY OR DIE BITCHES…Prop this motha up for one last blowoffthemothafuckingtop…LOL.

  30. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 6:37 PM

    Perhaps there should be an ETF that is contra to whatever Cramer says.

  31. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 7:14 PM

    puff puff give…. PUFF PUFF GIVE!!! You f*ckin up the rotation….

  32. Posted by guest | July 31, 2008 at 8:06 PM

    There are more false bottoms to this market than in a shoplifter’s bag collection.

  33. Posted by guest | August 1, 2008 at 1:14 AM

    Cramer appeared a little embarassed tonight, but gamely declared that he wasn’t going to let a 200+ drop in the Dow deter him from thinking the bottom had been reached.

  34. Posted by guest | August 1, 2008 at 5:59 PM

    @33
    Isn’t tha is counter to what a “bottom”

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.