Merrill Lynch has been thrown into turmoil by auction rate preferred securities issued by fund manager BlackRock. Brokers at Merrill, many of whom have customers with funds locked up in the still frozen market for the ARPs, are frustrated that BlackRock has not redeemed a greater share of the ARPs it issued, according to sources at the firm.
"People are going crazy because BlackRock is not redeeming as much as Eaton Vance and others in the market," a source familiar with the matter says.
Merrill's brokers have grown increasingly dissatisfied that their management has not done more to pressure BlackRock, which is 49% owned by Merrill, to redeem its ARPs, sources say. Senior executives at Merrill have defended BlackRock's position, which has triggered a backlash against them as well.
Some brokers are threatening to leave the firm, afraid that valuable customers will defect to rival firms if they are not made whole on their auction rate funds. Rival Morgan Stanley is publicly poaching Merrill brokers, trying to take advantage of the firm's troubles. Merrill already faces a class action lawsuit and a suit from the attorney general of Massachusetts over its role in the auction rate securities market.
Officially, Merrill praises the redemptions made by Blackrock.
"We've already made progress working with issuers and we continue to work with them to overcome this unprecedented liquidity crisis. BlackRock is an important part of this solution and we are working constructively with them," Merrill spokeswoman Selena Morris said.
BlackRock's redemptions lag behind some of its competitors. When the market froze BlackRock was the second largest closed-end mutual fund issuer of ARPS, and it has redeemed only 25 percent of its ARPs.
The largest closed-end mutual fund issuer of ARPs, Nuveen Investments, has redeemed or promised to redeem 35 percent of its ARPs, according to a report from Thomas J. Herzfeld advisors. Eaton Vance, which was the fourth largest issuer, redeemed 72 percent of its ARPs. Smaller issuers such as Lehman Brothers' Neuberger Berman, which is redeeming 50% of its ARPs, are also outpacing BlackRock's redemption.
But BlackRock is hardly at the back of the pack on redemptions. Many issuers, including third-largest issuer Allianz (which includes PIMCO), have not redeemed any of their ARPs, according to the Herzfeld study.
The situation at Merrill is fraught with tension and complex corporate politics. Many of Merrill's brokerage customers own ARPs issued by BlackRock. (Last month, James Stewart, the financial journalist, described in an article in the Wall Street Journal how he bought ARPs issued by BlackRock.) The thundering herd believes it is being betrayed by an arm of their own company.
"Outside providers are playing the game," a source said. "Larry Fink is not."
Inside of BlackRock they seem not to have heard about the internal strife at Merrill. There is, however, sympathy to the frustrations caused by the failure of the auction rate markets.
"I think it's very fair to say that many of the parties, including issuers, are frustrated," a source familiar with the thinking inside of BlackRock said. "While we've accomplished a lot, we still have a ways to go. We're frustrated that we haven't made more progress."
Until earlier this year, many closed-end mutual funds issued ARPs, which they used to boost returns by purchasing additional securities with the proceeds. While the market thrived, it was a highly lucrative leverage play, allowing funds to borrow long-term debt while paying short term rates. Roughly half of closed-end funds issued ARPs.
When the market for ARPs seized up around 180 days ago, BlackRock's closed-end funds had approximately $9.8 billion in ARPs outstanding. $7.3 billion remains outstanding.






Posted by bank_teller , Aug 06, 2008 10:33AM
this was not the way i wanted to start my day.
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 10:41AM
No opening bell today?
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 10:49AM
is it pronounced "A" "R" "P"s
or do you just say arp.
i'm going with arp.
Posted by Investorcluzo , Aug 06, 2008 10:52AM
seriously, this article indicates an "8:10 am" post. it's 10:30, what gives? what's with your IT people?
on a separate note: is anyone else listening to the freddie mac call? they are presenting a case that they only need $5 billion of new capital and have time to wait until the market "stabilizes". their advisors (gs and JPM) told them it would not be in the best interest of shareholders to go now, but they "are ready to move as early as today". this is shaping up to be a big game of chicken for the next several months/quarters. given that the stock is down 15% this am, round one goes to the market (sorry shareholders). as they say, the market can stay irrational longer than they can stay solvent...
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 10:54AM
3:
I suggest you say ARS (arse), which covers the whole spectrum of auction rate securities.
Posted by John Carney , Aug 06, 2008 10:56AM
We're pronouncing it like the second part of "Skadden Arps."
Posted by John Carney , Aug 06, 2008 10:57AM
Technical issues prevented opening bell. We should be back on track for the rest of the day, however.
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 11:06AM
@7 - *cough* bullshit *cough*
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 11:13AM
@8-- notice the lack of "where the fuck are you assholes" posts this morning? perhaps it's because there really were technical issues, including the ability to comment?
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 11:13AM
Blackrock likes earning those extra fee's on the "assets" they manged to steal and hold hostage from the ARPS holders. Apparently it is their "fiduciary" duty to the common holder to continue to run closed ended funds that sell at a discount to the NAV while the leverage they stole drives down their crummy principal investment.
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 11:30AM
Haven't heard this much about auction markets since that little incident in 1861.
Posted by Anal_yst , Aug 06, 2008 11:55AM
@ 8
db's been having issues since last night bud
Also in terms of pronunciation, its A-R-S, not ars, never heard it phonetically at least around hurr
Posted by CNote , Aug 06, 2008 12:04PM
waking up at 10:00 next to a 6'5" mini-skirt clad person called "Divine" with an empty bottle of Wild Turkey does not qualify as "Technical Difficulties"
Posted by Tapecracker , Aug 06, 2008 12:09PM
I say give Fleming a chain saw...
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 12:21PM
At least DB has come back with a nice, tart flavor. Posts and comments were so uninspiring yesterday. Perhaps DB editors and IT needed divine consolation.
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 12:23PM
wow. why are you such an asshole, 15? and if it sucked so much yesterday, why are you back?
Posted by John Carney , Aug 06, 2008 12:36PM
Feel free to speculate on my nocturnal activities. I was, in fact, drinking in one of my usual dives until the wee hours of the morning.
But that isn't why we didn't have an Opening Bell. Joe is probably the most dedicated financial writer working today. The only reason we didn't run the Bell this morning was because of some technical problem. I believe the tubes that connect our internet to the broader web got clogged.
In fact, I found out there was a problem when I got a text from Joe sometime before seven a.m. He's unstoppable.
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 1:02PM
@13:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD_aU7125rA
--Calgary Schmooze
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 1:09PM
As long as the interest rates they're paying aren't unreasonable, why should they redeem them? Just because some sleazy brokers lied about what they were selling and some dumb asses with money believed them?
Posted by guest , Aug 06, 2008 1:20PM
wow this post made street account as news