We’ve heard from lots and lots of DealBreaker readers who passed the CFA level II and level III exams, and a few who didn’t pass. (This time! Buck up, kids! You’ll nail it next time!) From what we can tell, reading DealBreaker seems to be positively correlated with passing. Readers seem to have passed in far higher percentages than the overall test taking group.
But we want to know a bit more about how you did on the exams. A few of you have already let us in on your scores. “My worst score was portfolio management,” one portfolio manager told us.
The test covers various categories, which we list after the jump, and test takers are told whether they scored in the fifty percentile, between the fifty-first and seventieth percentile and above the seventieth. So in the comments section below, let us know how you scored and what your job is. Is everyone’s CFA score negatively correlated with their professional responsibilities?
- Alternative Investments
- Corporate Finance
- Derivatives
- Economics
- Equity Investments
- Ethical & Professional Standards
- Financial Statement Analysis
- Fixed Income Investments
- Portfolio Management
- Quantitative Methods
I’m a hedge fund trader and my worst score was in both alternative investments and portfolio management.
Just received G.E.D. on the first try. Had summer intership in Risk at Bear pulled after the JPM takeover but waiting to hear back from Lehman after 3rd round of interviews.
Hey @1 who gives a shit
@3: Uhm, I do. I asked for exactly that information! Lay off the haterade.
I just passed Level 2, majored in economics in college. I got 50% or below in economics on both the Level 1 and 2 exams.
I just passed Level 2, majored in economics in college. I got 50% or below in economics on both the Level 1 and 2 exams.
i work at citi and got the worse in ethics… seems like a positive correlation to me
I too majored in Economics and I got the lowest score in Econ.
Can’t believe the venom I’m seeing for the past few days on the CFA thing. Looks like people who never tried, never had the energy to step up to the plate are criticizing from behind the anonimity of their keyboards: means nothing, its easy, wouldn’t put those initials on my card even if I earned them. Jeez.. You proud of yourselves? I’m thinking its the NY / Wall St / competitive thing taken to a very bad extreme.
shrug… I’m apping for jobs in portfolio mgmt (not going very well) and smashed that section on the CFA (level 1). I am kind of a stats/quant finance nerd though.
anyone putting specific section scores on their resume or mentioning them in interviews?
shrug… I’m apping for jobs in portfolio mgmt (not going very well) and smashed that section on the CFA (level 1). I am kind of a stats/quant finance nerd though.
anyone putting specific section scores on their resume or mentioning them in interviews?
11 I work in asset management. Don’t do it. The hurdle is did you or did you not pass.
I passed all three parts; each time, I scored the lowest on alternatives. I invest in alternatives managers for my job. That test is a racket. I swear there were a couple questions where every answer choice was wrong (and this was affirmed by multiple people each time who passed). They think they are training you to be an astronaut or something, trying to throw in a last minute wrench to see how you react when in a panic. Not to mention the proctors for those are some of the nastiest old chicks I’ve ever seen.
@10-11 Are you kidding? Putting your section scores for Level I on your resume would not only be a clear violation of the guidelines for use of the mark, but it would definitely earn you nothing but ridicule from any serious employers
- CFA charterholder
I am a portfolio manager and I just passed level 3. Portfolio Management has consistently been my lowest scoring topic on each level.
It would be lamer than lame to put individual section scores on a resume. What, “Got above 70% on CFA Level 2 Derivatives section?” Give me a break.
Anyway, I’m with everyone else – econ was my worst section despite being an econ major. It was so obnoxious of them to put two balance-of-payment questions on there! And portfolio management. That section was so fucking random.
What are people’s opinions of the CFAIA?
Glad I passed all that shit when I was younger and dumber. Now, I can go out and party on Memorial Day. When will the tools at AIMR or “The Institute” get their heads out of there asses and offer II and III more than once per year? Oh, and allow you to use a 20th century calculator.
@11–If anyone mentioned their section scores or any scores in an interview, unless they were highlighting how many times they had failed ethics, the interview is over.
I’m a cash equities trader and scored lowest in equity investments.
Passed level 3, job focus is asset allocation, and received low score in asset allocation.
When I took level III, one of my finance professors from B School was taking level III–again. Wish I had known that shit when he was terrorizing our section first year.
@11, be careful what you say about your results on the CFA on your resume and in interviews. They address this issue rather thoroughly in the ethics section. A good rule of thumb is to limit your dicussion of the CFA to why you want the certication, and where you currently are (i.e. what level are you taking next June). Discussing how you did on specific sections and where you scored is a slippery slope. Hopefully you did as well on the ethics section as the portfolio management section. I didn’t realize >70 percentile was smashing that section.
@ 17
If you’re talking about CAIA, step 1 is getting the name right, just a friendly hint
I saw a guy @ Vessey/Church handing out fliers for a CFA review class for you jamokes who failed.
#11 while all of these guys are freaking out to your question because they are little “ethical” CFA nerds, i just had a friend who interviewed at tpg and they asked for documentation of his specific scores. don’t put them on your resume but keep them handy in case someone asks for them. i guarantee #18 on this board either steals money or whores around regularly. you’re like one of those guys in an interview who says “my reputations is all i have.” those are always the guys you have to watch our for.
That’s the one Anal_yst. I think a lack of familiarity was implicit in the question. Any useful thoughts or just droll?
Ethics was tough for L2, I scored 50-70, wish the guy I copied off studied a little harder or guessed better in that section
You know, I think the more “real world” knowledge you have on a topic, the harder the topic is on the test. It’s just hard to “un-learn” things that may be the convention but aren’t what is taught in the curriculum.
9 – There’s no venom, it’s just a TLA that’s unnecessary to work in finance, or manage large sums of money.
The vast majority of the successful HF and PE managers I know and work with don’t have it. If you want it, bully for you!
Whether it’s trivially easy or not is irrelevant — at least pick one POV and stick to it. Either you were forced to by your boss, or wanted to ‘better yourself’ with another TLA.
In either case the amount of ‘energy’ you think is required is a complete non-sequitur.
#25, nothing is nerdier than telling anyone what you scored on stats on the CFA. You are obviously one of those retail brokers who try to earn the designation to impress your widow and orphan clients. Good thing they drop you before they notice “CFA Candidate” has been on your business card for five years and eight different bucket shops.
25 Are you serious? I passed III in 2002 and on any interview since, all I did was haul out the letter saying I had been granted the charter. No questions about scores. In fact, all I remember when getting the results each year is hearing for each section whether my score was average, or above or below average. Do they give you scores now?
I’m a sell-side analyst and my lowest score was ethics
Bought the books for Level I in 2005 and they haven’t left the shelf. Congratulations to anyone with the discipline to do it. Would rather slam my nuts in a car door than have to study for and pass all three levels.
I am surprised that econ majors seem to be doing poorly on econ–I thought that was the easiest with no studying. I wonder if they made it harder or just tossed in some BS national income accounting questions or something else nobody ever thinks about after Econ 101.
#31 this is #25 I was also surprised by this and haven’t heard of it happening much. THey give you a score range so that’s what they asked for. People used to do that for SAT scores back in the day, so I guess it’s not that surprising. #30 i don’t know what you are saying about giving your stat scores out.
can i start a new question: how many people got bombed after the test, much worse than usual? I know i did.
Work with Derivatives and fixed income. aced both of those sections. I think there is big time positive correlation.
Worst section was eco as well (eco major) along with Alt I. I’m gonna agree with some previous posters and say it’s a f’in racket. I trade and the material is not very useful in day to day work. The quant stuff is oversimplified and I pretty much don’t need the rest to do my job. Looks good on the resume, only on the buy side though. Most bankers could care less. The material is heavily skewed toward equities, which is fine, but it will almost do nothing for the FI guys.
#36–or since the layoff, you had more time to study.
36 For those sections I would agree. I don’t work in that area and just had some broad knowledge. Knew basic bond math and could barely define duration. Result was total agony learning those parts. Passed all three.
CFA now ranks you on how poorly you did on the exam. If you failed, you get a score of 1-10, 10 being the closest to passing, 1 being not even fucking close and pull up your pants.
One of my close buddies failed (level III) and ranked a 10. She was so fucking mad she hurled objects at random people/children.
Who wants to know that 2 wrong guesses is going to cost you another spring indoors, studying?
Stupid useless information designed to fuck with your mind!!!!
#33 I bought the books in 2001, needless to say things got slightly busy.
Congratulations to anyone with the dedication to work and beat books a few hours a day. I’m certainly to comfortable and lazy to try that crazy shit again.
I was an econ major and I got the highest scores on Econ & ethics. If it weren’t for my past life as an econ nerd I wouldn’t have been able to remembered what the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index was.
I work in mayo trading and scored lowest in ethics.
I think the only real take away is that those sections (Alt Inv, PM, Econ, Quant) are so small (6 questions) and the questions so specfic/random that the score category is pretty meaningless for them.
And, yeah, I work in quant and scored in the middle range on that section. I can laugh at it because I passed.
I went to the University of Chicago and majored in Economics. The CFA curriculum is quite different then the curriculum I followed in school. At one point I was getting less then 1 in 3 Macroeconomics questions correct on my schweser practice tests. Microeconomics was different, I scored 100% on practice tests.
props to you kids who actually passed this thing, hell i gotta gmat book and have been too lazy/indifferent/etc to get on that and its a joke comparitively
also
@ 26
1-2 took the CAIA, passed on the 1st try, and still thinks its a joke, so there ya go
29 The absolute number of successful HF and PE managers is pretty small. Realistically, betting your career on being one is like buying lottery tickets. It may work, but probably not. For the rest of us, the CFA program can open doors, especially in long only equities and to a lesser extent FI.
that’s funny..i swear to god i consistently did poorly in asset valuation, and i’m in valuation.
does anyone have any advice for when an incoming college senior should start thinking about the CFA?
I’m the CEO of a hedge fund. What is a “CFA”?
51,
get with it dude.
http://www.cfainc.org/
@50,
It sounds like you have already started thinking about the CFA. Perhaps your real question is when should I register? Studying for the CFA, especially levels II and III, requires one to sacrifice their social life. Figure out when you want to make that sacrifice and you’ve figured out when you should register. If you want to do that during your Senior year, fine. But if you are willing to make that sacrifice you probably have a pretty shitty social life, and pretty shitty social skills. The CFA designation won’t make up for your lack of interpersonal skills. If you are lacking in this arena, the higher valued added choice would be to spend your senior year mixing it up at the frat parties and the bars getting shitfaced. Seriously. Don’t underestimate the importance of the soft skills.
50 Lets just say that in a tough job market, it couldn’t hurt to have on your resume “passed Level I of the CFA”. The test is given in December and June, results for L I two mos after. So you’re a little late. If you have the time and the inclination, you could start the program and say that on the resume, then talk to it in interviews.
My opinion of CFAIA is that it affords the institute a whole new topic-opportunity for generating fees, which is mainly what these professional credentials are about.
Also, CFA Charterholder
The way to take it is get level I out of the way the June you graduate from B-school, or undergrad, if you are a finance type. Half of it will be stuff you already know by heart, so you won’t have to study for it much. Even if you do, you need something to do second semester, second year.
I remember in CFA I sitting about 10 feet from the hottest dude imaginable. Blond and tan with hot pecs and dressed in shorts from the diving team at some school – i wanna say UVA – and adidas slides on his big feet. I could hardly concentrate, but did in fact buck up and passed. Didn’t see him the next year at II, so I assumed he didn’t. But then at III, there he was, this time just as buff in regular shorts. One fine young man. Totally puts to rest the theory that only nerds do the CFA. GAnalYst
I went 3 for 3 and got
Ethics is a fooler. Its tricky and not as intuitive as people think. You actually have to study.
It’s not intuitive at all!
I’m not gonna memorize soft dollar shit and ethics guidelines. So I just read the questions, thought about what I’d normally do, and found the multiple choice answer that was the opposite of that.
I’m a naked short selling insider trading rumor monger, and I scored best on ethics.
What makes ethics hard is that it is all gray. You read it and know the right thing to do, but you know that is not an option for a Wall St. analyst, so it has to be sorta ethical. Makes it harder to BS. Also, it is not enough to know what you should do (the answer is always “disassociate” in some way) you have to be able to quote the damn chapter and verse. Total BS.
I got lucky on I and II and ethics was afternoon, so I got one last chance to cram.
Question for all:
How many years young were you when you decided to register for the Cant F*ck Anyone card? I just started ETF trade support trying to see where my career should go after a year of this bs. I live in slutville hoboken so its a choice between studying women or equity.
There’s probably not a negative correlation, but there’s definitely less of a positive correlation than most people expect. You study harder for what you’re most nervous about–for me that was quant. My stats knowledge sucked going in, but I spent a lot of time on it and was surprised to get >70 every time.
The Econ and PM sections are a little misleading, especially for people who think that an undergrad econ major means they don’t have to study. The material covered is specific; on Level 2 I think it was basically FX. And then the PM section is a very large portion of the test that includes some kind of random stuff unrelated to the daily work of talking to analysts and monitoring the portfolio.
I bombed econ and portfolio management – did ok with quant and “aced” the rest. I thought it was a pretty brutal test. I put in about 250 hours of studying, but it was worth it in the end.
Passed all three first try. I have to say that the pictures of some of the “CFA’s” that they have on the text books are f**king hideous….. for a long time I said to my self if i have to look like that then there is no way I am taking this designation. The situation has improved in recently but….
Calgreedy
Passed all three first try. I have to say that the pictures of some of the “CFA’s” that they have on the text books are f**king hideous….. for a long time I said to my self if i have to look like that then there is no way I am taking this designation. The situation has improved in recently but….
Calgreedy
Australian Equity Analyst
Worst score on FSA and ethics… f**k GAAP
I am waiting for timmmmmmay to endorse the CFA before I take it
It used to be pretty common knowledge that people tended not to do well in the area in which they worked. This was actually the first thing the instructor from Stalla said in my review class (circa 1999).
The curriculum is broad even within subjects and specific info is required – people’s expertise tends to be very niche so they overestimate their broader knowledge base and tend to give the answer “they believe is right” rather than the one in the curriculum.
Also – to all the people talking about how to put it on their resume, I recall there being an entire section in ethics about proper use of the CFA designation. I really doubt its been removed. And people wonder why the failure rate is high, actually reading and studying do wonders to improve one’s chances of passing.
#28.
yes. The more direct knowledge you have the harder the exam especially in portfolio management. Most PMs underperform the market and the CFA exam is likely a way to get these underperformers to unlearn what they should not be implementing in portfolios. Hard to teach an old dog new tricks though.
“From what we can tell, reading DealBreaker seems to be positively correlated with passing. ”
You are a fool. Making public whether you passed or failed seems to be positively correlated with passing.
You usually go lighter on sections you already know from your day job, hence the lower results in those sections. Congratulations to all those who passed. Good luck next year for those who did not.
#72 for the win!
#72 for the win!
#72 for the win!
51-70% on Derivatives, Equity, and Quant. Above 70% on everything else. Work in institutional marketing. This is for Level I, so the easy part is out of the way.
I just passed level 2, where’s this 1-10 ranking people are talking about? I didn’t see it online with my results.
#78 you didn’t see it because you passed.
70%
I don’t believe this refers to a percentile score, but rather an absolute percentage mark for each section.
Having passed Level III four years ago, I’ve never come across anything saying the above was a percentile ranking.
Check your facts!
My previous comment didn’t post properly.
I had at the beginning:
70%
Didn’t work again, so I’ll write it out:
less than 50%
between 50% and 70%
greater than 70%
LOL @ &. Good Stuff. I worked at JP Morgan Chase in retail for a while, and it aint any better over there.
oops, i meant to say @ 7.
m9mQkl Awesome blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
wow, awesome article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
I value the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Really informative article post.Much thanks again. Great.
I really enjoy the post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
Very informative article post.Really thank you! Fantastic.
I really enjoy the article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.
Fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.
Say, you got a nice article.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Very informative blog.Much thanks again.
Muchos Gracias for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Really Great.
Great, thanks for sharing this post.Really thank you! Cool.
Really informative blog post. Really Great.
Major thanks for the article post. Cool.
I really like and appreciate your article.Thanks Again.
Say, you got a nice post. Really Great.
I truly appreciate this blog.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
I hope that it does not disappoint me just as much as this one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read, nonetheless I actually thought you would probably have something helpful to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something you could possibly fix if you weren’t too busy seeking attention.
I loved your blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.
I loved your blog.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Thank you ever so for you article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article.Thanks Again. Great.
Thank you for your article post. Will read on…
I really liked your blog.Much thanks again. Will read on…
Very informative blog. Cool.
I value the blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on…
Thanks a lot for the article.Much thanks again. Cool.
Fantastic article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.
I am so grateful for your post. Keep writing.
Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
Enjoyed every bit of your article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…
I’ve been reading ought to be genuine and yes it seems like these are receiving targeted suggestions
Im obliged for the blog. Really Cool.
Thanks for the article post.Really thank you! Cool.
I value the blog article.Really thank you! Cool.
Great, thanks for sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
Thanks so much for the post.
Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.
wow, awesome blog post.Really thank you! Really Great.
Looking forward to reading more. Great article post.Much thanks again. Really Great.
I truly appreciate this blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
Major thankies for the post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Wow, great blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
A round of applause for your post. Much obliged.
Thank you for your article post. Want more.
Very neat post. Keep writing.
I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Great.
Im grateful for the blog article.Thanks Again. Keep writing.
Great blog article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
Appreciate you sharing, great blog article.Really thank you! Really Cool.
I cannot thank you enough for the blog post.Really thank you! Cool.
I really enjoy the blog. Great.
Great, thanks for sharing this article. Great.
I loved your post.Really thank you! Cool.
wow, awesome article.Much thanks again. Awesome.
I really liked your blog. Keep writing.
Thanks a lot for the blog article. Fantastic.
Thank you ever so for you blog.Really thank you! Will read on…
Awesome blog article. Much obliged.
Muchos Gracias for your blog article.Thanks Again. Awesome.
Very good article.Really thank you! Keep writing.
I truly appreciate this blog post. Keep writing.
Very good blog.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
Im grateful for the article post. Will read on…
Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Really thank you!
Thanks again for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
Thanks so much for the blog post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.
Hey, thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Awesome.
Very neat article.Really thank you! Keep writing.
I am so grateful for your blog post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
Thanks so much for the post.Much thanks again. Will read on…
wow, awesome article. Really Cool.
Very good article post.Much thanks again. Want more.