-68.jpg
Tomorrow: WHO KNOWS. So get off my ass about it, John Carney. “If we lose more money, then we won’t be well capitalized and will have to raise more money.” [CNBC]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (29)

  1. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:23 PM

    chooses – but yes, he’s definitely walking on egg shells

  2. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:27 PM

    @1 – explain yourself.

  3. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:36 PM

    @ 2 – Clearly Thain choosing to make an appearance on CNBC is a risky one, financials have been getting hammered, MER is down huge – last time I remember a bank CEO coming on CNBC and start muttering about capital levels was Alan Schwartz – and we know how that went. Which makes me wonder why exactly he agreed to come onto the show in the first place – especially to be grilled by Bartiromo. I would imagine it’s because out of all the banks, ML has seemed to be the most radio silent, and I guess the board thought that was a bad thing

  4. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:36 PM

    @ 2 – Clearly Thain choosing to make an appearance on CNBC is a risky one, financials have been getting hammered, MER is down huge – last time I remember a bank CEO coming on CNBC and start muttering about capital levels was Alan Schwartz – and we know how that went. Which makes me wonder why exactly he agreed to come onto the show in the first place – especially to be grilled by Bartiromo. I would imagine it’s because out of all the banks, ML has seemed to be the most radio silent, and I guess the board thought that was a bad thing

  5. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:39 PM

    @ 2 – Clearly Thain choosing to make an appearance on CNBC is a risky one, financials have been getting hammered, MER is down huge – last time I remember a bank CEO coming on CNBC and start muttering about capital levels was Alan Schwartz – and we know how that went. Which makes me wonder why exactly he agreed to come onto the show in the first place – especially to be grilled by Bartiromo. I would imagine it’s because out of all the banks, ML has seemed to be the most radio silent, and I guess the board thought that was a bad thing

  6. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 4:47 PM

    @ 3,4,5 – clearly you are an idiot

  7. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:01 PM

    @ 6 – well done

  8. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:04 PM

    @ 6 – well done

  9. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:06 PM

    @ 6 – well done

  10. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:14 PM

    How simple would it be for the code that underlies this comment section to do a simple string comparison to avoid duplicates?

  11. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:17 PM

    3,4,5 and 7,8,9 need to merge in order to survive

  12. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    10 That is so nerdy (“code that underlies”, “simple string comparison”), I love it. Bet its gonna be a long time before you’re out of work.

  13. Posted by I am a Dude | August 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    @10
    the DB staff is not too IT savvy. so to answer your question, it would be very difficult.

  14. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:23 PM

    @#12
    Actually I’m a hedge fund manager who spends most of his day coding.

  15. Posted by I am a Dude | August 4, 2008 at 5:31 PM

    @14
    ask Bess what she would do to get it done for the site

  16. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:32 PM

    @ 14 – back office IT does not equal “hedge fund manager”

  17. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:36 PM

    16 Maybe the guys being facetious. Or its a quant fund.

  18. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:43 PM

    @17 – or maybe it’s timmy sykes

  19. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM

    @16
    You are so in the know.
    We manage $4B and I am majority owner.

  20. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 6:03 PM

    @ 19 – you are the lamest fund manager ever. get back to work if you have so much money to take care of. gotta do something for that 2% mgmt fee, seeing as how there won’t be anything to take 20% of….

  21. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 6:13 PM

    Bess,
    He will understand 10′s post.

  22. Posted by guest | August 4, 2008 at 9:43 PM

    Bartiromo let him off easy. Another fluff-ball interview from CNBC.

  23. Posted by guest | August 5, 2008 at 12:58 AM

    They should just have a timer before they accept another comment from the same IP

  24. Posted by CNote | August 5, 2008 at 8:28 AM
  25. Posted by I am a Dude | August 5, 2008 at 9:15 AM

    @14, 19
    not that i dont believe you, but just so you can get your story straight next time.
    here in hedge fund fund world, hedge fund managers are partners not majority owners. majority owners are for the mcdonalds franchise.

  26. Posted by guest | August 5, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    I would MUCH rather deal with the double, triple, etc. etc. posts than have to read idiotic (excuse me for saying these) mayo and merging comments.

  27. Posted by guest | August 5, 2008 at 10:15 AM

    @26
    The entity that manages the portfolios of the hedge funds and thus earns the management and incentive fees is a corporation, not a partnership.

  28. Posted by guest | August 5, 2008 at 11:27 AM

    Its so funny that the majority of comments on any topic are all made by a bunch of people with nothing to contribute other than “you’re an idiot” or how much they pull in – posts 3,4,5 we’re all mine – blame the mechanics of this site, and the not the OCD of my fingers.

  29. Posted by guest | August 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    All of you get back to work! I’m checking my “Roll Call” to make sure you were all logged in before 9am. If I find out otherwise there will be hell to pay!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.