The supporters of the current structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac appear to be winning the debate at Treasury. "Merrill Lynch is telling its that a source within Treasury says they want to keep the GSEs in their current form, as in shareholder owned. That implies no 'takeover' any time soon, " finance blogger Accrued Interest tells us.
Merrill: Treasury Looking To Keep GSE's Shareholder Owned
Posted by John Carney, Aug 22, 2008, 4:13pm
Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!More Favorite Reads
Sep 15, 2009, 2:22pm
Technical Difficulties Prevented Warren Buffett From Saving Lehman Brothers
I sense some judgment from the Bloomberg reporter here re:...
More »Sep 15, 2009, 2:00pm
People! THIS TYPE OF PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MAKE PTJ WANT TO RAIN BUCKETS O' CHICKEN ON YOUR ASSES!
Tudor BVI Global: August 2009: 0.5% YTD: 12.5% ...as for...
More »
Sep 09, 2009, 11:27am
Goldman Partner's Neighbors Scandalized By Shirt Optional Parties
Goldman Sachs partner managing director Richard Kimball Jr. apparently got...
More »Sep 09, 2009, 10:15am
Job Openings At AQR! (UPDATE)
Ladies, if you've been looking to work under one of...
More »
Posted by guest , Aug 22, 2008 4:37PM
Plus, everyone is too busy schmoozing in Jackson Hole to worry about restructuring GSE's this weekend.
Posted by guest , Aug 22, 2008 4:54PM
a comment from B-52 Ben...
A statutory resolution regime for nonbanks, besides reducing uncertainty, would also limit moral hazard by allowing the government to resolve failing firms in a way that is orderly but also wipes out equity holders and haircuts some creditors, analogous to what happens when a commercial bank fails.
Posted by guest , Aug 22, 2008 4:57PM
This, of course, has nothing to do with the river of lobbying cash that flows from the GSEs.
Posted by guest , Aug 22, 2008 5:40PM
Totally
Posted by guest , Aug 22, 2008 6:39PM
preferences aside, this may not be optional. i'll bet Tsy didn't "want" there to be ongoing credit disaster for the past 12 months either.
Posted by guest , Aug 23, 2008 8:23PM
Treasury gives two $hits about FNM/FRE they care about the impact that writing down the pref would have on the banking system (good article today in FT about exposure).
I'd look for a transaction that wipes out common, restructures the pref to make it (more) difficult to value (30+ FRE / 80+ FNM securities), so as to obfuscate the loss of value. Senior will be fine (buy below par) and sub should be ok.
Takeaway is...anyone who is buying the common is retarded. Anyone who is investing in the pref likely needs to rethink their strategy.