• 19 Sep 2008 at 10:07 AM

Entitlement And Markets

Ann Woolner measures the pulse of the masses perfectly with her piece “Sue Them, Jail Them, Make Them Pay for Meltdown” in Bloomberg today. Her commentary sketches everything that is wrong with the last 15 years of the American Capitalist Experiment, and, like a Pokemon episode* to a photosensitive epileptic, leaves the unwashed reader twitching with anti-capitalist convulsions.

As it stands, the rest of us will be paying much money over a long time for the greed and bad judgment of those who melted down the economy.
Hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars are propping up firms that a relative few money lenders and Wall Street wizards ruined.
If that weren’t enough, the crisis is shrinking the money that Americans diligently socked away for retirement, down payments on first homes, college for the kids or this winter’s heating bill. We might as well have opened our windows and tossed out cash.
Beyond crimping living standards around the globe, the crumbling of the U.S. financial system has prompted action radical for a nation devoted to free enterprise. However necessary, it’s nothing short of astounding that the U.S. government essentially nationalized the largest insurance company in the country.

* Warning: May cause seizures in epileptics or Lehman employees.
More after the jump.


The degree to which this mirrors the American version of “return entitlement” boggles the mind. Last I checked “greed and bad judgment” were not illegal. Moreover, they are just a 15% jump towards the “good judgment line” away from receiving hero-like status in this culture.
The oft celebrated Warren Buffet is a greedy bastard. So is Bill Gates. That’s not up for debate. It is only the “judgment” element of Ms. Woolner’s discourse that makes any difference. Considering the rather small number of asset managers who actually beat the broader market, criminalizing bad investment judgement seems like a poor idea to me. But I might be in the minority here. Still, no one was complaining when Lehman returned quarter after quarter of record earnings in 2007.
No one is to blame for your poorly invested and badly diversified retirement losses other than you. If you didn’t know that you were getting 8%+ returns in the market because there was some risk of catastrophic loss involved, then you shouldn’t have been there in the first place. “…a relative few money lenders and Wall Street wizards…” did not ruin the economy. All of the market participants did with their blind belief that housing prices could only go up. That oil would remain cheap forever. That sovereigns might never lose their taste for subsidizing conspicuous consumption.
I think that the Woolner’s and Cox’s of the world have it backwards. We shouldn’t be restricting short sellers. We should give profits from short sales and puts preferential tax treatment.
The idiot who decided that owning a home was the American Dream actualized to such an extent, and the desire for which was honed to such a keen edge, that we were going to allow people to put down a mere 3% if they joined a government home ownership program is the nimrod that Woolner should be jumping on. (Three guesses who scuttled risk based pricing here).
The corrupt, nepotistic emperor who turned Freddie and Fannie into a cushy slot to drop big campaign contributors and political operatives into as a reward for a job well done should attract Woolner’s ire.
You are not entitled to an affordable MacMansion, cheap insurance on a hurricane scarred floodplain, 9% annual returns on your index fund for 40 years in a row or equities that go up but never come down, and as a Bloomberg contributor you really should know this.
Grow up.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (88)

  1. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:00 AM

    PWNED

  2. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:00 AM

    All congress or FASB had to do was eliminate the moronic mark to market rules on very illiquid assets and this entire problem goes away.
    They never ever ever figure out the law of unintended consequences.
    This was caused by over regulation

  3. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Make a CDO out of Woolner’s article, because that is not greedy

  4. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:09 AM

    “All congress or FASB had to do was eliminate the moronic mark to market rules on very illiquid assets and this entire problem goes away. ”
    Because we’d be so much better off with a bunch of zombie banks whose books are clogged up with crap overvalued paper.
    There’s a reason we spent a good chunk of the last decade laughing at Japan.

  5. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    cramer is a dumbfuck spreading the terrorist shit around. i’m a foreigner and already worried about capital controls. now i might be a small fry in the low 6 figures but think about big money in asia starting to pull out. that’ll be fun to watch.

  6. Posted by blndebnker | September 19, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    Damn EP. Smack that biznatch up.

  7. Posted by girl | September 19, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    psy·cho·path (sk-pth)
    n.
    A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse.

  8. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM

    well said.

  9. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    if anyone is to blame for this, its the same idiots who got us into this BS in iraq and used their Social Security money to buy nukes: the baby boomers.
    worst. generation. ever.

  10. Posted by Debter | September 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    pay your f’ing mortgage poors!

  11. Posted by Henry Ryecroft | September 19, 2008 at 10:20 AM

    A+++ would read again

  12. Posted by Debter | September 19, 2008 at 10:25 AM

    also agree w/ #9, but doubt #9 agrees with me

  13. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:25 AM

    Hey Bess the comment section in the “just putting it out there” post is not working.

  14. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:25 AM

    @9 you are correct sir. this crap about gen x gen y entitlement narcissm whatever drives me nuts. we’re probably closer to the pragmatic realists then the BBs could ever hope to be.

  15. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:27 AM

    @10 – this mess goes way beyond poor people you Rush Limbaugh-loving idiot.

  16. Posted by Bess Levin | September 19, 2008 at 10:27 AM

    @13– should work now

  17. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM

    “Another priority for a new term is to build an ownership society, because ownership brings security and dignity and independence.
    Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all- time high.”
    –GWB 2004 RNC Acceptance Speech
    for full text:
    http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/campaign/rncspeeches/bush.html
    -C

  18. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    Yeah, well Ann Woolner is like 60 and just getting married for the first time. She’s a little slow.

  19. Posted by EconAnalyst | September 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    EP you just lost me.
    Quoting from Atlas Shrugged rings too much of high school. I’m jumping ship to Clusterfuck.com or where ever Carney is going.

  20. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:36 AM

    Astringent but worth it. High dudgeon notwithstanding, the home ownership piece struck me as truth-telling. When I read real-estate articles touting new college grads buying up luxury loft condo’s on Chicago’s Near West Side, I re-allocated my investments out of real estate. Yes, the high returns were unrealistic. But I was reminded of the adage for winning at poker- to double your money, fold it in half and put it in your pocket.

  21. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM

    Ep what ever happened to business ethics? Forgot about those huh.

  22. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM

    Climate is what we expect; weather is what we get. What’ya mean the markets aren’t always bright ‘n shiny?? I PAID for this vacation!

  23. Posted by diablo | September 19, 2008 at 10:40 AM

    Institutions have a sense of entitlement. That includes GS, MS, banks, etc. They’ll keep “hiding” their toxic paper and manipulate the markets to stay afloat. They have friends in high places, Joe Blow doesn’t.
    But ultimately that strategy can’t be sustained. I bet we can all agree on that. Today’s short squeeze and options expiration anomaly might be a good time for longs to bail out of their positions. The dollar index is not liking this already, going down.
    Lets see where we are one week from now.

  24. Posted by ep | September 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM

    “Posted by EconAnalyst, Sep 19, 2008 10:35AM
    EP you just lost me.
    Quoting from Atlas Shrugged rings too much of high school. I’m jumping ship to Clusterfuck.com or where ever Carney is going.”
    Well, sorry to hear that. Carney will enjoy having you, I know.
    (Though I think you read the post before it was properly edited, still, to each his/her own).

  25. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM

    @2 –> Exactly.

  26. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:48 AM

    EP, that gave me a boner. And I don’t even know what you look like.

  27. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:50 AM

    I really just blame poor people for not paying their mortgages. Let’s face it, if you can’t pay your mortgage you’re a bum. If you’re the executive who didn’t discriminate between rich people and poor people, you deserve to lose your job. How dare you forget your elitist ways.
    I’m going to take the first step in the right direction and spit on a homeless man on my way to buy a suit this afternoon.

  28. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:51 AM

    But at the end of the day, Wall Street is a one way street: make money for your firm and take home a big bonus, loose money and others will cover the losses. So much for Atlas Shrugged. EP?

  29. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    If people are snapping up treasuries like candy, some paying in the negative numbers then why doesn’t the government just issue 30 year treasuries at 4% to finance the debt. They’ve done it before.

  30. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM

    @2 – you’re an idiot. oh so you let these companies carry these illiquid assets on their book at a value that they themselves think is reasonable? that’s exactly like Enron booking revenue on its bandwidth trading business when the thing wasn’t even operational yet.
    i propose that MS and GS get taxed at 85% now since without the government’s intervention both would’ve ceased to exist. we’ll call it a survivorship bias tax and if they don’t like it, we’ll reinstitute short selling.

  31. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:07 AM

    Atlas Shrugged? Thats IS funny, I had thought it went out with Don Johnson and Greed is Good.
    If we dont think that Wallstreet and the government had responsilbity for this mess then we are quite deluded.
    I think in a country with such vast resoruces as the US everyone is ‘entitled’ to a roof over their head and 3 squares a day.
    What we arent entitled to are $400 bottles of Ketel One, $300 shirts, Maseratis, 1500+ per sq/ft housing, and conspicious consumption. (It is not sour grapes but rather the hypocracy of experience). The disparity of wealth was becoming too great in this nation and when that occurs there always is upheaval [economic, social etc.]. If anything the IB’s, banks, ‘the street’ in general has to realize it was too greedy and should suffer the consequences. Or as we have seen be rescued by a new deal type entity–in which case how dare we/they complain when healthcare, or other government subsidies are given to those who do not have as much.
    -C

  32. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:11 AM

    All of this bailout shit just pisses me off and I get more pissed with each passing day. Reward the greedy and irresponsible, great message to send to younger generations! The government should just let the worthless shit the banks hold go to hell and the homeowners who bought homes they can’t afford move to Mexico or back in with their parents. Why should I pay for this shit?

  33. Posted by Debter | September 19, 2008 at 11:13 AM

    @15, it does now, but it started with subprime, non-investment grade mortgages (read: only mortgages poor people, or rathe,r the ones who really couldn’t afford it) being carried on the balance sheet at washed AAA levels (through the ratings agencies using a method of over collateralization). Just pointing out where it began.
    It’s falling home priced stupid.

  34. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM

    @21 Business Ethics 101 was only a 1 unit class

  35. Posted by diablo | September 19, 2008 at 11:18 AM

    @33
    Should Cox be asked to resign? If yes, why?

  36. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM

    Can’t wait for the new formula thats gonna prevent any new securities from doing the same thing.

  37. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    Bravo. More of this EP.

  38. Posted by Debter | September 19, 2008 at 11:28 AM

    Yes, and Thain bears responsibility (maybe more) too. I also don’t agree with all this bailout mess either (from a philosophical point of view).
    Why: but because there was a failure of transparency/ oversight. This is what the SEC is tasked to do.
    My earlier points are simply to remind people where this started not who’s fault it is or what is to be done about. If there had been no decrease in housing prices, we would not in the position were in today. Defaults exacerbated this. But…there was and here we are.

  39. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:28 AM

    So its the fault of those that felt they were entitled to own a home? I think its instead the fault of those who felt compelled to pump the post 2001 economy. Lets face it: what little Bush era prosperity we saw was linked entirely to the housing boom. Absent that, the administration was a total zero. Blaming homeowners for Bush’s pump and dump scheme (who could forget “ownership society”) is really too much. Good thing it didn’t get its hands on social security as well.

  40. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:32 AM

    This Woolner bee-yotch is really quite something. Who should we put in jail? Greenspan? The foreign investors who propped up U.S. asset prices? Franklin Raines? Barney Frank (er, never mind-he’d probebly enjoy it)? This hag should be writing at the Huffington Post, not Bloomberg.

  41. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:33 AM

    @39 see 17

  42. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:47 AM

    The upgrade from Carney to EP is so immense as to be ridiculous. Not only are EP’s writing quality and grammar significantly better, but she actually has cogent arguments and takes real stances. If it means more EP, then good riddance Carney, he was a hack in comparison.

  43. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:52 AM

    EP you conveniently forgot that Warren Buffet and Bill Gates were also philanthropists. And you also ignored the fact that this was not a mere market downturn but the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
    “Bad judgment were not illegal.” Really? So when a air traffic controller’s bad judgment causes disaster, he or she is not responsible? I’m sure as hell not wanting to live your version of capitalist Utopia. The financial terrorism was not committed by the short sellers but laissez-fair fundamentalists like you.

  44. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM

    Equity Private…
    When Paulson, Bernacke, and Cox assumed office, they each took an oath, part of which says, “to defend against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic”. This is the same oath I took when I was commissioned a Naval Officer long ago, a commission I still have, a commission I’m proud of, a commission I will have till I die, and a commission similar to those held my many millions of other americans.
    Whether you like it or not, the current financial crisis is an “enemy”, a powerful and dangerous enemy, brought about by powerful and dangerous individuals, and an enemy that if left unchecked would bring the financial system that the entire world looks up to into ruin, into a state of Financial Anarchy.
    The enemy is being checked, our defenders are using desparate means, means that everyone doesn’t agree with, but means that are being viewed warmly by the financial markets.
    Perhaps instead you’d rather see rugged capitalism run its course, and have the world slip into that Financial Anarchy.
    Then we can have the Russian criminals, you know, the ones with the black leather jackets, the greasy unwashed hair, the unshaved faces and the bad teeth, yeah those guys running things. The ones buying houses in Greenwich. The ones who’d pull your strings and kill your familes if you didn’t do what they said.
    Sounds like a much better arrangement, doesn’t it?
    The Guy from Delaware

  45. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    Who should we put in jail?!?!? Who should carry the burden of belieiving that our friends will help make good?
    We have oursevles to blame.
    And we are in the jail that we built.

  46. Posted by ep | September 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    “EP you conveniently forgot that Warren Buffet and Bill Gates were also philanthropists.”
    You prove my point. Their unbridled greed was required to amass the avarice that permits one to be abundantly charitable.
    “‘Bad judgment were not illegal.’ Really? So when a air traffic controller’s bad judgment causes disaster, he or she is not responsible?”
    OOPS! You blew it. The words “responsible” and “illegal,” which you conveniently merged here, are quite distinct. And no, you don’t see an ATC employee going to jail for making a bad call on the air. Your weak example was only scuttled quicker by the fact that “responsible” and “illegal” are in your personal thesaurus together.
    You better do everything perfectly from now on, or it’s off to the Gulag for you! Strict liability and mandatory death sentences for everyone! Hurrah!

  47. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    “all enemies foreign and domestic”
    TGFD I am interested to see how you define enemies
    Is an enemy one who wishes inherent harm?
    Is an enemy one who is against capitalism?
    Is an enemy one that causes a reduction in our standard of living?
    Is an enemy one that causes job losses?
    Is evolution and enemy, Darwinism?
    Or are those that simply look like the bad guys enemies?
    If our actions are to based on such definitions I am very curious how one defines this.

  48. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    43, you’re trying make this an argument about how much wealthy people give to charity? And if they don’t give enough, then they should be locked up? Move back to Russia, and do some research on Fuld’s charitable causes before making absurd comparisons. Don’t judge anyone’s compensation whom you know nothing about, whether it be their intelligence, hard work or career advancement.
    As far as the aircraft controller, there is a big difference between gross negligence and simply making a mistake or being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The former is punishable, the latter is not.

  49. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    The ghost of Kafka @ #45? Could it be?

  50. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    EP, nice smackdown of Guy from Delaware’s tendentious, Cramer-influenced sermonizing. Keep it up.

  51. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    “Mr Sharkey? He’s not at his desk right now, can I take a message?…..You connect the dots; you put the pieces together.
    You know I can see two tiny pictures of myself and there’s on in each of your eyes.”
    -William S. Burroughs, “Sharkey’s Night”
    —#45
    @49: I’ve got a great deal on a quiet peaceful place. You in?

  52. Posted by DS | September 19, 2008 at 12:31 PM

    Great article, thanks!

  53. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:43 PM

    Am I the only one or others also think that TGFD is one of the biggest sore-ass losers there are out there.

  54. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    @51,
    I’m down ’til I’m underground. Meet me at the cigarette machine.

  55. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    @53: You’re not the only one.

  56. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    @53
    I agree. The guy from Delaware is a homeless LOSEr. Mofo SOB.

  57. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM

    @53 looks like we have a quorum.

  58. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    @53:
    TGFD = Faggot

  59. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 2:10 PM

    I went to have lunch, Back now.
    smackdown@#50…
    I don’t see any reference to TGFD in ep’s #46 entry. Do you? Also, I never listen to or watch Cramer; he’s like a cartoon character anyway.
    guests@#53 & 55-58…
    Quorum?? Why should I give a damn about what you think? Your comments are meaningless.
    The Guy from Delaware

  60. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 2:55 PM

    @TGFD
    “guests@#53 & 55-58…
    Quorum?? Why should I give a damn about what you think?”
    And yet, you do. Sad.

  61. Posted by guest | September 21, 2008 at 1:22 AM

    Businesses lose money and go bankrupt every day. Wasteful enterprises need to go bankrupt- our modern, wealthy lives are possible only because markets redirect wealth from less productive enterprises to more productive ones.
    If unsuccessful entrepreneurs were punished for making losses, successful entrepreneurs – and our economy – would be destroyed as well. The real criminals are the politicians forcing you to pay for the market’s mistakes. Unfortunately, people like Ann Woolner are only encouraging them to continue to rob us – and cripple the market.

  62. Posted by JohnAdled | April 24, 2012 at 6:10 AM

    http://www.Idonthaveasite.com – Nosite Excellent post! Really loved it, havent seen an artice this good in a while.

  63. Posted by AlaBlueda | April 27, 2012 at 2:04 AM

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will certainly comeback.
    get twitter followers

  64. Posted by PurpleFrank | April 27, 2012 at 4:15 AM

    FYI, your blog doesn’t look right in Opera.
    background and credit check

  65. Posted by ShaniquaSuera | April 27, 2012 at 8:38 AM

    Simply desire to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is just nice and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.
    hot looks for summer

  66. Posted by GreenFire | April 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM

    Really interesting articles. I enjoyed reading it.
    affordable car insurance

  67. Posted by DoleNed | April 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM

    Great information gived from you.
    ios 5 jailbreak

  68. Posted by ChrichtonChrichton | April 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM

    I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one today..
    SEO Software

  69. Posted by SeanDelinga | April 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM

    Hello! I noticed that your news feed is broken :/ I thought I should remind you that. My RSS reader failed for your site’s domain.
    bars Denver

  70. Posted by BruceBoa | April 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM

    I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You’re amazing! Thanks!
    Denver night clubs

  71. Posted by MaxJason | April 28, 2012 at 12:52 PM

    Can I just say what a relief to seek out somebody who truly knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You positively know the way to deliver a difficulty to light and make it important. Extra people need to read this and understand this facet of the story. I cant consider youre not more fashionable because you definitely have the gift.
    Ashton cigar

  72. Posted by BjoeRels | April 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM

    wicked blog, this is going on my twitter.
    rare gold coins

  73. Posted by CelsoSky | April 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM

    Nice post. I study something tougher on different blogs everyday. It is going to all the time be stimulating to read content material from other writers and follow a bit something from their store. I’d desire to use some with the content material on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a hyperlink on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
    Nyt Tag

  74. Posted by ShaneCricv | May 2, 2012 at 4:30 AM

    I like your website, i really enjoy seeing your articles, good luck in the future.
    Ashton Cabinet

  75. Posted by ElrodTomori | May 3, 2012 at 12:31 PM

    Hmm, there seems to be some difficulties with the first link, as it returns a 404 error
    spilleautomater

  76. Posted by KierstinDavey | May 3, 2012 at 7:00 PM

    Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is fantastic, let alone the content!
    search engine marketing

  77. Posted by AlexDoe | May 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM

    Much more of this please
    cigars cheap

  78. Posted by jacksoncookht | May 6, 2012 at 9:26 PM

    Hola from Florida! I am just bored to death in the office and so I chose to check out your website on my [url=http://202.51.192.166/mediawiki/index.php/User:Hunter]Source Of Stats[/url] iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the information you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, wonderful site!
    Hi! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest writing a blog [url=http://208.75.149.220/~ugalambd/mediawiki/index.php/User:Orlando]Click Here[/url] post or vice-versa? My blog covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!
    Right now it seems like Movable Type is the best blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what [url=http://community.techearup.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:Anna]Here You Go[/url] you’re using on your blog?
    Superb post however , I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit [url=http://wiki.multikulti-exchange.de/index.php?title=User:Brandon]From Here[/url] further. Cheers!

  79. Posted by JohnDavey | May 9, 2012 at 9:22 AM

    making time and real effort to make a good post. Cool!
    HVAC Training

  80. Posted by ShawnJordan | May 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM

    Hey you’r website is cool, I very enjoyed it.
    seo seo software tool

  81. Posted by ShaniquaMori | May 20, 2012 at 8:27 PM
  82. Posted by ShaniquaMori | May 20, 2012 at 8:28 PM

    The next time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my option to learn, however I actually thought youd have one thing interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you possibly can repair if you werent too busy in search of attention.
    (Leather sofas|black leather sofas|Cheap leather sofas}

  83. Posted by MrxJax | May 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM

    There’s a vast quantity of info on the webpage you’ve started. With thanks.
    facebook.com/DDCoilandgas

  84. Posted by DavedadLegai | May 21, 2012 at 5:04 AM

    This submit was very nicely written, and it also contains quite a few valuable details. I appreciated your expert manner of writing this post. You’ve got produced it simple for me to realize.
    edge tek

  85. Posted by DelingaNason | May 21, 2012 at 11:58 AM

    I just identified your weblog on Ask Jeeves, a really fine understand.
    used tires san diego

  86. Posted by AlexSean | May 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM

    Hi, i think that i saw you visited my site so i came to “return the favor”.I am trying to find things to improve my website!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!
    Eforce Compliance

  87. Posted by BaoDole | May 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM

    Hi! I imagined your article was trendy and will visit generally.
    click here

  88. Posted by KelsoMailo | May 22, 2012 at 3:47 AM

    Quite good post, the post gave a bunch of information. Thank you
    suspensiones rough country

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.