• 10 Sep 2008 at 3:00 PM

Got Something To Say?

We’ve exited this bizarre alternate universe and comments are now once again working.

Comments (241)

  1. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM

    first

  2. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:05 PM

    “excited”
    stop reading right there.

  3. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:06 PM

    Nice Bess. What was the problem?

  4. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:06 PM

    Too long didn’t read.

  5. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:07 PM

    Mayo

  6. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:08 PM

    @3:05– it says (and has always said) “exited,” retard.

  7. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:08 PM

    Damn! I was actually getting work done when we couldn’t post.

  8. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:09 PM

    what’s going on with lay-offs at lehman? i thought i saw on the WSJ that they happened yesterday, but haven’t seen any more reporting. anyone know?

  9. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:10 PM

    Sham wow

  10. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:10 PM

    danielle hughes is looking sharp.

  11. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:12 PM

    AHHHHHHHHHH. MMMMMMMMMMAAAAYYYYOOOO!!!!!!!!

  12. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:14 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  13. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM

    too much mayo in the servers. good thing you had the shamwow to clean it up and fix the comments.

  14. Posted by finance_baller | September 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM

    whats worse, “sham-wow” or “whats sham wow seriously” guy?

  15. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:17 PM

    comes free with a magic jack

  16. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:17 PM

    @3:08–Bess your two cute.
    Retard

  17. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:19 PM

    Fuld needs to merge with batwing in order to survive.

  18. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM

    @16– huh?

  19. Posted by diablo | September 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM

    Does this work?

  20. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM

    @ 16 – your or you are (you’re)
    moron

  21. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM

    DB needs to merge with Gasbag pastrami sandwich in order to survive.

  22. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM

    DB needs to merge with Gasbag pastrami sandwich in order to survive.

  23. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:21 PM

    What number am I?

  24. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:22 PM

    i’m amazed you guys haven’t blown your load over gasparino’s on-air shoutout earlier today – something about db getting it right re: 55% re: Lehman?

  25. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM

    20,
    its a joke, looser.

  26. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM

    @20 R you sure?
    Retard

  27. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM

    just heard a collective sigh of relief. damn, I really wish I could have read all the comments from the monday morning quarterbacks post tricky-dick’s conf call this morning. I almost choked when “mike mayo” asked his question. glad to have you guys/gals back online…

  28. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    Probably the earliest shamwow was nothing more than some sort of cloth or fabric that absorbed liquids.

  29. Posted by John Carney | September 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    @24: It was pretty nice of Gasparino to give us credit. More people are realizing we scooped everyone on this story.
    http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/new_media/blogosphere_beats_msm_to_the_lehman_bros_punch_94131.asp

  30. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:26 PM

    I remeber a time when the too long, didn’t read, mayo, and associates pay comments were funny. Hell even the triple posters were always good for a laugh. Now, I don’t even know where to begin.
    Thank the lord at least Bess is still funny as hell, and Carney can mix it up from time to time, thats the only thing DB’s got going for itself right now.

  31. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:26 PM

    @25
    Its “loser” and I’m not joking.
    Retard.

  32. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM

    I was honestly very lost today without this website. Please ensure it does not happen again.

  33. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM

    @30– “Thank the lord at least Bess is still funny as hell, and Carney can mix it up from time to time, thats the only thing DB’s got going for itself right now.”
    um, considering bess and carney are the only things that make up db, what the hell else would it need to have going for it/be lacking?

  34. Posted by voxdulcis | September 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    I missed you, Bess.

  35. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    DB needs to win back my affection.

  36. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    DB needs to win back my affection.

  37. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    DB needs to win back my affection.

  38. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    DB needs to win back my affection.

  39. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:31 PM

    @30 yep. missed the puerile posts. But just like cussing, nicotine, and heroin it really loses its effectiveness when overused.

  40. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:32 PM

    #30
    As Bon Jovi once said
    we’ve got to hold on to what we’ve got doesn’t make a difference if we make it or not.

  41. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:32 PM

    Hey retard at 31. It’s “it’s”, looser.

  42. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:35 PM

    @30
    whats associates pay?

  43. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM

    Hey Bess how about more opinion polls?

  44. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM

    da bears

  45. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM

    what number am i.

  46. Posted by finance_baller | September 10, 2008 at 3:38 PM

    @33
    Wharton blog guy is pretty awesome and shouldnt be overlooked

  47. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:39 PM
  48. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:40 PM

    opinion polls on what

  49. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM

    @33- “what the hell else would it need?”
    Funny comments

  50. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:42 PM

    @49 the point was it’s funny that he was saying “that’s all it has going for it right now” when THAT is basically the whole site

  51. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:42 PM

    palin for guest blogger

  52. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:42 PM

    palin for guest blogger

  53. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:43 PM

    palin for guest blogger

  54. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:43 PM

    Sarah Palin makes my pee pee wiggle

  55. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:44 PM

    @ 47 – bess’s forehead is much larger.

  56. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM

    @50
    I’m confused.

  57. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM

    27-year-old Slate writer Justin Peters reviewed several brands of adult diapers.
    Store Brands
    For the sad soul who is both incontinent and destitute, and for nobody else. Conventional wisdom says that any savings that may result from using generic personal-hygiene products are subsumed by the discomfort that users must endure. This is doubly true for generic adult diapers. Unless you are impoverished, or a masochist, there is no reason to go generic. The savings are minimal, and so is the quality.
    I tested three different store brands: Target (Affirm), Walgreens (Certainty), and Kroger (Kroger), all of which were similar in price (low) and quality (low). The simple verdict: Don’t use the store brand if you have any plans at all to do anything that day besides change your adult diaper.
    My experience with Kroger was particularly memorable, which isn’t a good thing when it comes to diapers. They were about as absorbent as a drainpipe, sagging under the weight of the water and leaking like Daniel Ellsberg. These pull-on-style diapers went on easily and didn’t actually feel too bad when I wore them dry, but years of using my congenitally cheap roommate’s Rite-Aid-brand toilet paper has steeled me for discomfort.
    Eventually I consumed enough liquor to muster the courage to wear them wet. Unfortunately, consuming all that liquor also mustered enough urine to make the testing process one of the more unpleasant experiences of my life. The diaper swelled until it could swell no more, at which point streams of urine began running down the sides of my legs. Even though I had locked myself in a bathroom to perform the test, I still feel unaccountably ashamed, as if God were laughing at me—a feeling made worse by my inability to exit the diaper. The Kroger diaper features quick-release strips on its sides so that wearers can rip the sides for a quick and easy exit. But the strips didn’t immediately rip, and I just stood there stymied for a few seconds, tugging ineffectively at a wet adult diaper and feeling as if there must be easier ways to make a living.
    Afterward, I headed directly to the shower.
    Wearability: 2
    Absorbency: 1
    Longevity 1
    Style: 2
    Total: 6

  58. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:46 PM

    @58
    b/c you’re dumb

  59. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:46 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  60. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    @61 stfu

  61. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    # 1 , 2 , 5, 9

  62. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    # 1 , 2 , 5, 9

  63. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    #56
    I don’t give a shit.
    SPODE

  64. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    @61 stfu

  65. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM

    @61 stfu

  66. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM

    Just for the record, #49 is not the same as #58, thats just some other idiot.

  67. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM

    @59 – That is one of the best things I’ve read in days.

  68. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:48 PM

    @SPODE– haha. that was funny.

  69. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:49 PM

    you’re gross bldebnker

  70. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM

    @SPODE– haha. that was funny.

  71. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM

    Geez, I’m starting to miss The Guy from Delaware. At least he had something to say. This is just getting inane.

  72. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM

    You’re gross, 73.

  73. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:51 PM

    @ 47 -
    That’s Kate Bosworth

  74. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:51 PM

    @SPODE– haha. that was funny.

  75. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    @SPODE– haha. that was funny.

  76. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    if sarah palin were to star in a porno, what would the plot be?

  77. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    @75, YOU ARE THE GUY FROM DELAWARE

  78. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    Adult diapers are for small to moderate amounts of pee. I do not recommend them for taking a dump.
    SPODE

  79. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    @blndebnker – please do not encourage that $hit (pun fully intended). I now have this sinking feeling about getting old and sitting at the local bar…I’d rather read about bonuses being 1/2 of what they were – 3 years ago.
    side note – when are you having drinks with girl and I (yes anal_yst and fun can come too)? as for 1-2, need to make sure the hatchet is fully buried.

  80. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    DayMan.
    Fighter of the NightMan.
    Champion of the Sun.
    Master of Karate and Friendship, for everyone.
    -BeckyBootFan

  81. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    @83- why do you insist on constantly making your social arrangements in db threads?

  82. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    Sham WOW
    MAYO
    MAYO
    MAYO

  83. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    Sham WOW
    MAYO
    MAYO
    MAYO

  84. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    Sham WOW
    MAYO
    MAYO
    MAYO

  85. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    83 Cluz: Isn’t it “girl and me”? Tell me you were just typing fast.

  86. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    Sham WOW
    MAYO
    MAYO
    MAYO

  87. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    Sham WOW
    MAYO
    MAYO
    MAYO

  88. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM

    @cluz – I know I shouldn’t encourage this brand of humor but honestly I laughed out loud. In fact, totally owe you a drink if you didn’t find that funny!
    Dude I’m down. When are you planning the next drinks?

  89. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:56 PM

    Layoff reports? Anything? No? It never happening/happened? LEH doesn’t want to layoff?

  90. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  91. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM

    @70
    Your correct its a difference of 9.
    SPODE

  92. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM

    Re this Palin stuff. She seems like a nice enough lady but, honestly, what does she know about anything? Heard last night that she’s like most Americans – hard working, honest, family oriented. Okay, but what does she think about China? Russia? Free trade? Urban issues?

  93. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:00 PM

    @83, leave girl’s hatchet wound out of this.

  94. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:01 PM

    @85 – b/c it works
    @89 – (a) typing fast, (b) wasn’t an english major, and (c) this is an ‘effing blog…it’s not like I spelled loser with two “o’s” or misused “it’s”. gotta pick your battles.
    @blnde – friday.

  95. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:01 PM

    @81: No, I’m really not. (Nor am I TOGFD.) Just someone who remembers when interesting and amusing comments dominated these pages rather than all this one line crap.

  96. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM

    @cluz – Ah most likely out Friday but will check in for deets in case.

  97. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM

    @95: “email this people, and stfu”
    after a post like that, you need to stfu…

  98. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:04 PM

    i work at lehman- who wants swag? one dolla for my pen.

  99. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:04 PM

    101 is right.
    Obama’s done blow with Qadaffi. He’s well qualified.

  100. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:05 PM

    @104 you like tgfd– leave.

  101. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:05 PM

    Cluz 89 here. Normally I would agree with you, re petty misspellings, etc. But confusing “me” and “I” or that other commone one: “affect” and “effect”, somehow seems more eggregious (sp?). To me anyway. Its like a signal that you went to a bad school or something. Which we know you didn’t. So do me a favor and be more careful with stuff like that.

  102. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:08 PM

    @89/113 – you got me, but with the grammar lesson, you sound like my ex…and everyone has told me to ignore her (despite her emails). and shouldn’t you be using spell check if you’re going to get on my english usage? it’s “egregious”

  103. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:09 PM

    I’m done with this. Lehman is basically collapsing, there is probably a ton of insight around, but no one will post or tip because of the juveniles (no, it’s really not funny after the first 75 times). See ya.

  104. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM

    hey guys whats sham-wow?

  105. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM

    111 You may not agree with Obama’s policies (although that disagreement is probably based on some simplistic notion like “hes gonna raise taxes”), but he knows and is interested in sh*t. He’s not just a moose hunter. This Palin thing is like revenge of the dummies. Reminds me of Christmas time when all the double wide (people, not trailers) come in from the hinterlands to see the Rockettes. They’re nice people, but do you seriously want them running the world?

  106. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM

    fuckin site sucks now. c ya

  107. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:11 PM

    Lehman laid off a bunch of people I personally know yesterday. So it’s happening or happened.

  108. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    I don’t understand why people bother to post that this site sucks and that they’re leaving, etc. If you want to go, go. What is the point?

  109. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    no I’d say she’s unqualified.
    what are obama’s qualifications?

  110. Posted by Anal_yst | September 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM

    8=======D~~~
    thats all I got

  111. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM

    117 Ya think LEH is collapsing? Tell me why. Seems like after this morning’s announcement all’s good in the world.

  112. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM

    no I’d say she’s unqualified.
    what are obama’s qualifications?

  113. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM

    @117 and 121 – I’m going to stop reading since you’re not posting anymore…maybe you two should start your own blog.

  114. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:14 PM

    @117 and 121 – I’m going to stop reading since you’re not posting anymore…maybe you two should start your own blog.

  115. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:15 PM

    there’s a toilet on my floor that hasn’t been repaired in two weeks. it’s like they know it’s closing and just said ehh don’t bother.
    i want to know when the sympathy lays start?

  116. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    @130 – LEH? WaMu?

  117. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    I’m 121, and I just posted one minute ago…there’s people following me faster…but yes, 5 of my friends got laid off yesterday. Don’t have any special insight yet, but as I talk to people…

  118. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    @ 117 – stop being such a hockey mom

  119. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  120. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:17 PM

    Where the hell is Thadeus R. Rogers? Doesn’t he know there are probably hundreds of needy (former) Lehman women?

  121. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:17 PM

    119,
    FYI: John McCain is running for president.
    (She’s not qualified, neither was John Edwards, Dan Quayle, or Geraldine Ferraro. Spare me the outrage at political expedience.)

  122. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM

    @ blndebnker – Wanna go out?

  123. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM

    132,
    Alot of my friends got laid yesterday too.
    Awesome.

  124. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM

    @Raw Dog – Your name scares me. I will pass.

  125. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM

    @114
    Where have you been? Palin stopped the bridge to nowhere. If she hadn’t stopped the bridge to nowhere then people on that bridge wouldn’t have known where they were going. Why can’t you people understand that. She was a mayor and bought new vending machines for all of Wasabi. Cut her some slack she’s ready to lead.
    Ask yourself this #114 “how do you get back from nowhere?”
    SPODE

  126. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM

    @blnde from 130: leh
    yes layoffs started yesterday. was told closer to 1000 than 1500.

  127. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:22 PM

    ‘Sham-wow’ appears whenever another person gets fired at Lehman.
    That’s what sham-wow is.
    sham wow
    sham wow

  128. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:22 PM

    “Something to Say”…
    As I’ve said before on DB, I will say again:
    The obama campaign is failing and falling apart. His inability to make a decision, his lack of any actual substantive ideas, his poor off-the-cuff speaking skills, his recent “my muslim faith” comment, his utter lack of experience, his long-term friendships with radicals, his choice of Biden as VP, his recent dispatch of 30+ lawyers/investigators to Alaska to try to find some dirt on Palin, his childish, personal attacks on McCain and Palin, his support of sex education for kindergarten kids, and his emptysuitedness all point to a stunning defeat for obama in November.
    Just saying “change”, “more of the same”, “hope”, “same old thing”, “new direction”, “lies & more lies”, without giving any specific particulars defines obama’s whole campaign.
    In the history pages of failed democrat left-wing presidential candidates, obama will join McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry. That’s where he belongs.
    The Guy from Delaware

  129. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM

    136 Your FYI that we should focus on McCain and SP is an unimportant part of the equation falls short for two reasons: 1) given McCain’s age, the “heartbeat away” thing is a vald consideration 2) the whole McCain campaign was going nowhere until she came along. The reality is that SP is in fact a very important consideration.

  130. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:25 PM

    So, regarding Leh layoffs, if you know these people personally, what areas were they in? How deep were the cuts in certain groups? Throw us a bone, a little color please…

  131. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:26 PM

    146 – good luck. $10 says you get tldr, shamwows and mayo comments before LEH insights.

  132. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM

    @142 – I’m really sorry to hear that! I didn’t hear the number this morning (managed to zone out at that moment) but I hope it’s not you. Good luck!

  133. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM

    We need a post here that says — “All Sham Wows and Mayo please comment here” And another about something (politics Palin, anything..) that says “The rest of DB clever/witty and profane people comment here”
    Segregation! – give the mayos and shamwows separate but equal space to be inane.

  134. Posted by FUNdamental | September 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM

    cluz — I’d be down, happy hour sorts time frame??

  135. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:29 PM

    Why do you have to make sure 1-2 has buried the hatchet? How is 1-2 doing?

  136. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM

    Bake Sale for Lehman 8 am tomorrow

  137. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM

    @149 AGREED

  138. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM

    What are Lehman Associate #’s?

  139. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM

    @152 AGREED

  140. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM

    145,
    do you think obama is qualified to be president?

  141. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM

    @155 AGREED

  142. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM

    @156, yes, I do.

  143. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM

    @156 No, the Big O (Zero) is not qualified.

  144. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 4:39 PM

    @blndebnker – What’s wrong with my name? Are you really blind?

  145. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:39 PM

    @156,
    what has he done to be qualified?

  146. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:41 PM

    @160: blndebnker is “blinde”, not “blind”. It’s all about the details man.

  147. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM

    145 Here. I’m gonna get s**t for this but here goes: 1) My first choice was Hillary – good instincts, strong policy understanding, argues well on her feet. 2) When she lost I was leaning very strongly towards McCain – good smart guy, also good instincts, good leadership qualities 3) McCain picks SP, a total airhead, like the Jerry Springer show, nothing good about her 4) Concluded that McCain has caved into the views of the hard right nut cases, so I changed my mind about his good judgement and am now supporting BO. Who, though not my first choice, will do just fine. Unlike the JM/SP combo.

  148. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM

    i love how obama supporters can never outline how he is qualified for PUSA. deflection, deflection, deflection.

  149. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM

    quit reading at 1).

  150. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:46 PM

    @165– i think you’re confusing the republican’s tactic for the dems’. did you even watch your convention?

  151. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:49 PM

    @167– deflection.

  152. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 4:49 PM

    @151: 1-2 is doing fine. just need to make sure he and girl are cool being in the same room. I don’t like awkwardness. they are both good eggs, but seem to have had a “disagreement” – about what, is their concern not mine. (how’s my grammar/spelling?)
    @fun: yes, happy hour…

  153. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM

    @160 & 162 – Are you guys fucking serious? BLONDE not blind or blinde. Sweet Jesus I hope you’re both joking.

  154. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM

    #164 is the Investment Banking Associate from Wasilla, by the way.

  155. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:50 PM

    165 et al Its hard to say why someone is qualified. What you want is someone that’s capable of making good decisions. Experience is part but not all of that. You can argue McCain vs. Obama, depending on what your focus on, one better than the other. But both are qualified. SP though???? A total zero, yet her charm and sass appeal to a large part of the electorate. Scary stuff. Has she ever been to NY? Does she know anything about financial markets? Does she have a world view? She’s presiding over a state that’s like nowhere else. Basically sit there and let the oil royalties and federal money roll in. And serve as a safe haven for a lot of people running away from things, seeking solitude. Repeat: scary stuff.

  156. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:51 PM

    151: yeah he gave her the shocker, and she’s not down with that type of bevhavior.

  157. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:52 PM

    get a life cluzo

  158. Posted by HAM05 | September 10, 2008 at 4:53 PM

    @clutz, awckwardness is like cheesesteak, the more the better.
    is this a midtown thing?

  159. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:53 PM

    investorcluzo: please give 1-2 our best, tell him to come by and give us a shout; vent; whatever. I liked his posts. thanks.

  160. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:55 PM

    169 Touchy cluz… Still smarting from that all too public confusion over “I” and “me”? Forget it. We all make miztakez.

  161. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:56 PM

    @172
    Funny that you think that the most important qualification for pres is whether the person has been to “NY”.
    Clearly, you are not from NY as otherwise you would know that you mean “NYC”.
    I hope you are proud of that brief three-day period you once came to NY.

  162. Posted by girl | September 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM

    @ Cluzo
    1-2 and I had a drink together like 2 weeks ago; we’re friendly. As for the boards, I’d appreciate it, naturally, if you kept whatever you knew about me and my epic awkwardness with those in my orbit to yourself. Cheers

  163. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM

    Clutz, BlindeBnker, et al – I will be joining you all for drinks. I can’t wait to “see” blindebnker… get it? Haha. Yeah, that’s right.

  164. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:57 PM

    @178 shut the fuck up you moron. actually, only tool bags say nyc.

  165. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM

    172,
    what has obama done to be qualified to be president?
    specifically (law review? community organizer? he lists running a successful voter registration drive on his bio, is that it?)

  166. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM

    @181 No you shut the fuck up you hicktown tourist.
    Next time you are in NY, remember to send a postcard to your community organizer.

  167. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM

    girl,
    1 you are too smart to use “like” in that manner.
    2 sorry about the shocker.

  168. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM

    FYI…
    Polls say that the obama/Biden ticket is not doing so well in Delaware as the dems were hoping it would. Reminds me of the 2004 election when Kerry/Edwards couldn’t carry Edwards’ home state.
    The Guy from Delaware

  169. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:06 PM

    @186– no you are a fucking idiot. My candidate has a ton of experience, and yours has none. You go kill yourself.

  170. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:07 PM

    186,
    Please reread the question retard!
    Having a job and doing something aren’t the same thing, ass lick. Did you think John Edwards was qualified in 04? He too was a 2 yr senator who had done absolutely nothing.
    I guess you like the way Obama talks. He is very good at that.

  171. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 5:08 PM

    bldbnker – seriously, what’s in a name? Should I sign in as Casanova instead?

  172. Posted by girl | September 10, 2008 at 5:08 PM

    @ 185
    I haven’t heard a guy above the age of 13 ever say “the shcoker”, which further confirms my belief that you should turn your sights back to
    a) your World of Warcraft game
    b) Trying to trade your last Ox for a ride across the river on Oregon Trail.

  173. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:09 PM

    BO = Big Zero

  174. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:10 PM

    Totally. Bat wing.

  175. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:10 PM

    @191: hahaha ohhh snap!

  176. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 5:13 PM

    Nevermind bldbnker – now I’m interested in having a drink with girl. She had me at “below”. So girl, how bout it?

  177. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 5:15 PM

    Raw Dog is all yours girl

  178. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:16 PM

    Raw Dog,
    I was like talking to girl and she was like all oh youre too young, and i was like no way and she was like all yes way. so then we played on her wii and she gave me the shocker. and i was like all, yeeeeeahhhhhh.
    -12 y/o cassonova

  179. Posted by John Carney | September 10, 2008 at 5:17 PM

    Did we ever decide where we’re having drinks tonight?

  180. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    How did the comment section go to hell so fast? Where did all these morons come from? Mayo, Sham and First were tolerable, even funny sometimes. This is just chaotic and inutile.

  181. Posted by blndebnker | September 10, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    Oh there’s drinks tonight? I would be down for that.

  182. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:19 PM

    girl will you bat wing me?

  183. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM

    batwings

  184. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM

    batwings

  185. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM

    batwings

  186. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:21 PM

    @199
    “inutile”?
    sham-wow

  187. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:21 PM

    batwings

  188. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:22 PM

    batwings

  189. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:23 PM

    batwings

  190. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:23 PM

    batwings

  191. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:24 PM

    wow, sham-wow is a sham. scam.
    another person at lehman got fired.

  192. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 10, 2008 at 5:26 PM

    @carney, name the place. not too far down in nyu land though…I’m assuming bessey will be too tired for the festivities.
    @girl – please accept this official public apology for the poor judgment/slip.
    @177 – that was sarcasm, not my fault you can’t spell.

  193. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM

    @210 give us the leh details!

  194. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:28 PM

    lehman???

  195. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM

    who got fired at leh, dick?

  196. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM

    i work at lehman, who wants my duffel bag?

  197. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:31 PM

    which is nerdier, world of warcraft or dungeons and dragons? who would know?

  198. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 5:32 PM

    Carney – thank god you’re here. Seriously, let’s throw back a few this fine evening. And don’t be scared of my name as is blndebnker; I’m merely a Sarah Palin supporter. RD-ing is just a part of my Christian value system. I suggest drinks at Ullysses or perhaps Del Frisco’s.

  199. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:33 PM

    @raw dog you sound like a meathead.

  200. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM

    Raw Dog: it’s fantastic that you support Sarah Palin (whatever you do in your spare time is your own business). Please support McCain as well.

  201. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM

    Raw Dog is a breath of fresh air in this place.

  202. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM

    @219-223: no, she is not a slut. she is just horny.

  203. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM

    question– are you still a virgin if you’ve only had anal sex?

  204. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM

    question– are you still a virgin if you’ve only had anal sex?

  205. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM

    question– are you still a virgin if you’ve only had anal sex?

  206. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM

    question– are you still a virgin if you’ve only had anal sex?

  207. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:38 PM

    @228-230: yes if you are a male

  208. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:43 PM

    what number am I?

  209. Posted by FUNdamental | September 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM

    Carney — yea or nea on this evening?? I vote against Ulysses though.

  210. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  211. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  212. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:48 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  213. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:48 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  214. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:48 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  215. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:49 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  216. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:49 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  217. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:50 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  218. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:50 PM

    @235-239: only if you are a male virgin (see 232 above).

  219. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:50 PM

    is ‘what number am i the new mayo’?

  220. Posted by RAW DOG | September 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM

    FUN – let’s do flash then.

  221. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:53 PM

    lets go to puss n boots on the turnpike

  222. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:54 PM

    is the anal question coming from a palin family member?

  223. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 5:55 PM

    @247: no, the anal question is from RAW DOG

  224. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 6:01 PM

    JC can you get rid of these guys? Maybe only allow posts with accounts? The comments are really starting to deteriorate.
    /commenting as guest just for the irony

  225. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 6:03 PM

    Didn’t BL earlier say that all mayo type comments will be blocked? When is that going to start?

  226. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 6:18 PM

    Only 7 people have clicked “Recommend this!”
    Lets go people you can do better.

  227. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 6:32 PM

    #250
    Easy, they just figured out how to let us post again, blocking certain comments is going to take time and another hamster wheel.

  228. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 6:43 PM

    I have some old 486 computers that JC can borrow to help with the comments section upgrades. More than enough power to justify the upgrade hassle- 66mhz, 16MB RAM and 200MB hard drives. The exteriors have stickers all over them and the led lights don’t blink anymore, but none of this should bother you as you’ll be more than pleased with speed boost that comes with pushing the “Turbo” button.

  229. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 7:02 PM

    hilarious how you guys act like you know what the problem was when you’re merely readers (and not insiders) of the site.

  230. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 8:35 PM

    178 I am from NY: Manhattan. Yr the one that went to St Francis, graduated cum laude and now reconciles fx accounts at Paribas. And takes the ferry back to SI, where mom always has dinner waiting. Why else would you be so stupid as to support a ticket with an empty headed bimbo like Sara Palin on it? Oh, and if by chance I’m wrong and we’re nabes in Manhattan I bet yr living with three roomates, which means no privacy so no sex utill you all go so frustrated you started regularly sucking each other’s dicks.

  231. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 9:02 PM

    FINALLY,it’s my turn to post!!
    My forefinger is tired of pressing down arrow key of my PC.
    Carney, where’s that Weisenthal now? I’m glad you fired a moron.

  232. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 9:06 PM

    anyone remember back when the DB comments section didn’t suck?

  233. Posted by guest | September 11, 2008 at 9:56 AM

    259th!

  234. Posted by guest | September 11, 2008 at 10:13 AM

    It’s better to burn out, than fade away.

  235. Posted by guest | September 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM

    @256: What’s St Francis? Is this a school for mentally retarded? And how do you know so much about this St Francis and Staten Island? And then all these dick-sucking roommates?
    (I have never heard of such awefullness)
    Describing yourself, aren’t you?

  236. Posted by guest | September 12, 2008 at 8:22 AM

    #144 “his support of sex education for kindergarten kids”. I see when Republicans repeat lies often enough, a few idiots actually do accept them as fact. Gee, what a surprise that TGFD is one of those idiots.

  237. Posted by guest | September 14, 2008 at 10:39 AM

    MY GIANT HUGE PENISLAND.NET

  238. Posted by guest | September 14, 2008 at 11:40 PM
  239. Posted by guest | September 15, 2008 at 1:41 PM
  240. Posted by MegaPolarBear | September 15, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    People who vote for mccain/palin are one of three things; 1) Racist 2) Rich and Greedy 3) Stupid and probably racist.
    It’s shell-shocked moronic vet, an opportunistic sell-out and a semi-retarded bible loving mom from ALASKA!!! It took this woman 6 years to graduate college. College in Hawaii and Idaho. Running our country, through the worst financial crisis of our lives. The other side has an intellectual force we’ve never seen the likes of, and the chairman of the foreign relations comittee who didnt even live in Washington, he took the train home to Delaware.
    Education equals “fancy language words” to Obama’s retractors. “Yeah sure, he has fancy language words and smart idea thingys and magical detailed solution plans, but McCain is a Maverick! HOORAH!”
    Hoorah, indeed.
    Have I lost my mind? Doesnt everybody hate the REPUBLICANS who run the country, the same ones running McCain’s campaign!!! The same ones who sunk his 2000 primary campaign by saying he had an illegitimate black child! How could this venerable war vet hire those same scoundrels who are the kings of smear campaigns and misinformation??? Why would he choose the filthiest group of neocon sickos who would say anything, no matter how false, to discredit the other candidate?
    Ohhhhhhhh…. the other guy is black.
    The media will say it was because of this or that, but everybody knows exactly why this will end up however it does. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see what is happening. And be sure, they will make you wish you voted for Obama, until you get the chance again in 4 years, and you are duped into voting for McCain again.

  241. Posted by guest | September 15, 2008 at 9:07 PM

    Did anyone see Mad Money today?
    The first 2 minutes were a rerun of last Monday’s Dow +290, Cramer screaming how the financials had bottomed because of FRE/FNM, etc.
    It then abruptly switched into today’s “real” show.
    Was it deliberate or accidental? Anyone with the scoop?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.