Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein make their first ever appearance in Vanity fair's 2008 ranking of the "New Establishment," it's often crazed ranking of today's movers and shakers. The chiefs of JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, who rank 21 and 20 on the list, obviously made the cut because their firms so successfully navigated the credit crisis, with Dimon building his bank up further through the acquisition of Bear Stearns while so many of his rivals are downsizing operations and selling assets.
Private equity honchos have suffered. Stephen Schwarzman and Peter Peterson, the founders of Blackstone Group ranked in the top five, DealBook points out. This time around they're not on the list at all. Henry R. Kravis of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts slipped from 51 to 77.
This kind of listing are always flawed, of course. The rankings can seem arbitrary and the so-called 'establishment' isn't any such thing. An 'establishment' is more properly an exclusionary club that protects its members and their interests against outsiders. Vanity Fair's 'new establishment' often appears to be nothing more than a ranking of who its editors would like to interview. Or perhaps who can get a table at the Waverly Inn.
Most demonstrative of this flaw is the plunge of Stevie Cohen of SAC Capital, who slipped 54 places to No. 99. Does anyone really believe that Cohen is less powerful or influential this year than last? Certainly not the Vanity Fair editors who described SAC Capital as one of the people who brought down Bear Stearns.
That also makes us wonder where all the powerful shorts are? Jim Chanos? David Einhorn? Bill Ackman? None of them made the list.
New Establishment [Vanity Fair]






Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 10:46AM
"Does anyone really believe that Cohen is less powerful or influential this year than last? "
Does anyone really care?
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 10:55AM
Timothy Sykes on the list?
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 11:02AM
it's just a list of people who's names came up at cocktail parties in WEST hampton and seaside heights this summer. Buncha tacky housewives w/ hobbies writing articles for magazines.
Posted by Anal_yst , Sep 03, 2008 11:03AM
I think your statement that this is effectively the Waverly Inn's ranking, nothing more.
Silly media/entertainment/fashion/whatever types who think that they're "better" than those with 100x+ more $ and power than them, sigh...
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 11:08AM
more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power more $ and power
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 11:13AM
http://www.brownharrisstevens.com/detail.aspx?id=364979
there's a sixer in it for anyone who helps me move into my new place this weekend. The couch is gonna be a bitch- it's foldout...
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 11:19AM
This is bullshit. Schwartzman for President.
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 11:22AM
And JPM's stock is currently trading at the essentially the same level as when Jamie come on board. Nice creation of shareholder value...
Yet we all still kiss Jamie's ass...
Posted by guest , Sep 03, 2008 12:06PM
Could be vulgarity is verboten this year.
Posted by Anal_yst , Sep 03, 2008 1:35PM
@ 6
That's Martin Zweig's place, its been on the market for probably 2 years now...seems despite the basketball court size living room, no takers for anything that far south on the park that isn't @ 15 CPW